Share This Episode
The Line of Fire Dr. Michael Brown Logo

The Reason for the Impeachment Process

The Line of Fire / Dr. Michael Brown
The Cross Radio
January 21, 2020 4:10 pm

The Reason for the Impeachment Process

The Line of Fire / Dr. Michael Brown

On-Demand Podcasts NEW!

This broadcaster has 2083 podcast archives available on-demand.

Broadcaster's Links

Keep up-to-date with this broadcaster on social media and their website.


January 21, 2020 4:10 pm

The Line of Fire Radio Broadcast for 01/21/20.

COVERED TOPICS / TAGS (Click to Search)
  • -->
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Our Daily Bread Ministries
Various Hosts
JR Sports Brief
JR
The Charlie Kirk Show
Charlie Kirk
Matt Slick Live!
Matt Slick
Matt Slick Live!
Matt Slick
Faith And Finance
Rob West

Will the impeachment trial is starting to make of it is time for the line of fire with your host activist and author, international speaker and theologian Dr. Michael Brown your voice of moral cultural and spiritual revolution Michael Brown is the director of the coalition of conscience and president of fire school of ministry get into the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH. That's 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown thanks for joining us friends on the line of fire.

Michael Brown delighted and blessed to be with you. Hope you enjoyed the repeat broadcast from yesterday we pulled out one from our archives of this would be fascinating for Martin Luther King Day.

Hope you enjoyed that.

Glad to be back live in studio with you here simply call 866-34-TRUTH 866-34-TRUTH 878841 reminds you at the outset of the broadcasts that I am not a conservative talk radio host and this is not a political radio show we could go weeks, and just focus on Bible theology, we could just focus on cultural issues. We could just focus on reaching Jewish people I be fine with all that and there are times when to focus on political issues because they do affect us right now.

Impeachment trials you here so before I share a few basic thoughts with you want to get your take 866-34-TRUTH should witnesses be called for the trial. Should there be an extended open trial where both sides get to call witnesses bring everything out into the light, but the nation here and see and then let the Senate make its decision or is it best that this is done quickly, that the whole impeachment process is been a witchhunt to start that everything should just be dismissed. There should be an immediate acquittal things done quickly behind closed doors. What you think a witness is important to bring everything into the light to call for witnesses when you've got nothing to hide or is that to add dignity to a process that shouldn't be dignified at all what your take 866-34-TRUTH.

You can also weigh in with twitter pole. We asked this question so that's it. DR Dr. Michael L. Brown machines to ells in the middle or DR Michael L. Brown on Twitter or RS Dr. Brown Facebook page. We've got a pole running their I wrote an article with an interesting title.

It is this the Democrats the impeachment in the fable of the scorpion and the frog. So I'll only give you this perspective, it is clear that largely what is happening right now in DC is driven by partisan politics that the Democrats are overwhelmingly pro-impeachment and Republicans overwhelmingly against impeachment and there's no surprise in the degree that this is a partisan political issue, but here's a question to ask yourself if your Democrat in the house and you know you you are 99.9% sure that when he gets to the Senate that the Senate will say okay that's it. Trump is acquitted you the whole thing thrown out, or more likely he's acquitted, you notice gaps in literature like you to succeed in removing him. Why go ahead with the impeachment. Also, as far as poles right now indicate that there is more disapproval of removing Trump and there is disapproval of comp himself. In other words, if his performance ratings.

If it is let's say he's at 44% national approval. He's much higher percent.

People say no don't remove him. So even people don't approve of his presidency don't want them to be removed which would suggest that present trouble come out of this process stronger which place, if you are a Democrat, why would you look to impeach him, but just look at some of the polling data that I cite in this article as of yesterday January 20 86.3% of Democrats support impeaching the president, in contrast with just 12.6% of Republicans cruelly force and what trumps Trump's current approval rating is 44% coordinate gallop 46% of Americans say they would like their senators to vote to convict Trump remove him from office, while 51% want their senators to vote against convictions or trouble remains present. So efforts to remove the president from office are less popular than the president himself.

So that begs the question why have Democrats from before the inauguration been talk about impeaching Trump. Why has this been coming up over and over and over again from one Democrat here from another hear from several of why is this been a steady theme all along was Longview and there is an editorial on Los Angeles Times opinion page December 4, 2019. Actually, letters to the editor. Democrats wanted Trump in peach from the start because he deserved. In other words, he's destroying the nation. He is committing high crimes and misdemeanors and therefore he should rightly be impeached, and he should rightly be removed and that is the right thing to do not let me say I I assume there are Democrats in the house who genuinely believe that the right thing to do was to construct they've either felt that for a long period of time feeling that his actions are such that he should be impeached and removed is a constitutional basis for or they are now convinced that the Ukraine call and think surrounding that such that are such that they rise to the level of impeachment and removal so I I don't doubt that there are people of conscience in each party who are not acting in a partisan way, but are acting on their convictions. At the same time I don't doubt that many than my view would be the majority are driven by hatred, Trump now look if Trump was a Democrat. The Republicans would hate him with an intense passion if he was a Democrat.

The Democrats would not hate him the way that they hate him retweet understand that we understand the political world, and we understand the way that we think if it's our guy when I was critical that the other guy were more critical that human nature, but let's not disguise the fact that what is driving so much of this impeachment process on the Democrat side and God only knows the exact numbers in terms of people's art is hatred Trump so here's an editorial, December 18, 2019.

The opinion section. Fox News is by Matt Wolk entitled impeachment is based on Democrats hatred of Trump and anger at his election, that's obviously what's driving much of the summit. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to notice that yours was fascinating. 1999 Sen. Charles Schumer wrote a passionate letter a day before Bill Clinton was acquits this was February 1999. He wrote a passionate letter. The New York Post carried a story about this and say that that his words are now coming back to bite him.

Charles Schumer's 1990 my letter but impeachment comes back to bite down the one hand he was bemoaning the price that the nation had paid over the impeachment and the divisions that it brought and it was appealing for Republicans, Democrats, the parties and the people in America to work together.

That's part of, but so much of what he said you could apply until today since it's look at this solution wrote this 1999. If you asked me one year ago. If people like this was such obvious political motives could use our courts play the media and tantalize the legislative branch to achieve their ends and bringing down the president I would've said not a chance. That doesn't happen in America owe you to repeat those words for today. He also said it seems we've lost the ability to forcefully advocate for a position without trying to criminalize release dishonor adversaries over matters having nothing to do with the public trust and it is hurting the country is marginalizing polars in the Congress that the I understand that the way president Trump carries himself in the things that he says could provoke tremendous hatred and people consider destroying our country are degrading our country are dividing our country make it.

They have all this criticism but none of those are impeachable so to get to the point of driving for impeachment even when you know it's not gonna work the sun behind it as as as representative Nancy Pelosi said on Bill Moore to the present your impeach forever. At least we can do this right and and and and listen to what Charles Schumer said even though he closed his letter with a call for unity. He said it is shaken me that we stand at the brink of removing a president not because of a popular groundswell to remove him and not because of the magnitude of the wrongs committed, but because conditions in late 20th century America made it possible for small group of people who hate Bill Clinton hit his policies very cleverly very doggedly exploit the institutions of freedom that we hold dear and almost succeed in on doing him notice an operative word hate friends. That's what's driving the process.

It's it's obvious it's clearly say get. I'm sure there are people of principle involved among the Democrats who feel it is the right and righteous thing to do by the law and ethically and morally, constitutionally, it is their elective duty to do so, but it's quite obvious that so many are driven by hatred of the present. So even if you know this may be political suicide is only gonna get stronger through it hates gonna drive and that's what reminded me of the fable of the scorpion and the frog so you know the story there scorpion and frog are sinning among side of the river. Scorpion asked can I ride on your back to the frog across the river because it's a leg across in the Fox's wall that I let you do that. Interestingly, if you stay me to drown.

References will why would I sting you what I sting you because if you drown. We both drown. So the frog thinks it's good reasoning gets Scorpios back sources from across the river and scorpion stings him and other frogs drowning about to die while you do this were both going drown scorpion.

It's my nature. So that's what's happening now partisan politics aside, yes, absolutely. People acting with this political motives on both sides. Yes, absolutely. But what is largely driving this impeachment process which is not the will of the people in terms of most Americans wanting president Trump remove and many would say does not have legal or constitutional grounds, and even from political viewpoint could well backfire in the president Trump even more popular and stronger after this make the Democrats look even worse. Why do with some its principal for many so question it is hatred of Pres. you agree with me to differ: 866-348-7884 and let me know if you think that witnesses should be called during the impeachment process. I said hey why do things behind closed doors be open that everything be known publicly since certain things have to be done behind closed doors may discuss rules and procedures and things like that to be monopolized when I bring everything out to the service. Do I feel the same way now there's a trial. I feel like everything should come out witnesses on both sides reset the skin to drag us further down the useless half questions 866 number and gives the line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown in the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown leaned out of those for ISS right before the show started to believe that witnesses should call for the impeachment process on twitter. We've got 48.8% saying yes 37.1% saying no. 14.1% saying. Unsure on Facebook. It is 46% yes, 54% know is that interesting that you got both social media audiences of folks who follow me. But the demographics are different. So the results of polls are often different, very interesting. What's your view 866-34-TRUTH and before I take your calls and get into a discussion about this when we say this were ever you fall on this review form the political divide in in in terms in terms of of whether or not you agree with my positions here or will your overall view of the president right if you are a blood washed brother or sister in Jesus said when he blood washed will then you're probably not. If you know the terminology right. You are a born again fellow member of the family of God, of the word of God is your authority of Jesus as your Lord, we are brothers and sisters and we in the Lord have the solution to America's problems we in the Lord are called to make a difference. We in the Lord are the key for the direction of America right so we can disagree on the six week we can have different perspectives on these things and that is perfectly fine and I may have an insight you don't have. You may have an insight I don't have an these things are not hills of the Madonna Hills and Diane are our basic foundational biblical life and death principles.

Let us not be divided from those if we have political differences because if there is going to be a gospel baseball and cultural revolution. It's going to come from us White House, Congress, Supreme Court, other institutions. They play a role but primary change is going to come through God working through you and need to revival coming through you and me. That leads to awakening in the society. So I want that always to be our focus. When I do talk about political things. Ultimately, I do my best to bring perspectives and to pray and think about these things and try to bring some kingdom wisdom without becoming partisan in my politics as I do not put my trust in the political system. I put my trust in the one living God, 86634 to all that's going over to fail in Greensboro, North Carolina. Your first what are your thoughts… Well, happy new year happy new year Mark. All all all that quote basically totally wrong thought out one thought out word and all were you part number two I think that the Democrat not what….Band adequate at the born again believer that's coming out a hate… And there is something that I think we Democrat that we didn't like about the things that he had done on the things that they knew commonality and voted out in the apathy of that week. Now I think that is probably long and we don't know. Upon the evidence would be evidence of hate doing this in the Bible say that out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks rights of the evidence we have only I agree with you.

We don't know hearts. That's why talking terms of Solomon Mannion. God knows hearts but but what would be evidence of hate. How could we see that there is hate what you think you think that there okay so I would say that if someone expresses extreme animosity for someone speaks of them is very very ugly terms even ask a rational life for us that I… I… Well sometimes yes, sometimes I think what he does is is is demeaning is as harmful as destructive.

I wish you wouldn't do it but I mean, you do understand the hypocrisy of pointing out certain things about the president while being Democrat meaning your your voting for the killing of babies as a Christian I'm not going to sound. That strikes me as odd word usage or Democrat. Now do the same or Democrat yet that not totally something that I yet here but you said that you are Democrat you made that statement fail correct Democrat not not building. I do not believe the client can write II understand you hang on one second I'm not a Republican of an independent okay as I can't I cancel that I can't write right II can fully identify with with with a political party, but when you decide your Democrat that's that's threw me a little bit because part of their free foundational platform is pro abortion processing sex marriage on so strong on that right now on yesterday. Not really a Democrat.

I I now obligate them to things that Democrat Bill affidavit, something that independent like I like them to think of the public got it, though you feel is wrong to say that people who the president word that how they can make the get in that grid that are readily apparent, but not the thing were meeting negative up the work that a long time ago about all that opening that worked out that now that that administered a good look at the negative of the word the work that hate life and we do the work of my work life. The word hate.

I don't think Democrat, ball and out you put it on at the media that the whole and right now we want to gamble you have to mount. What about they know that… Have gone out. Every bit like this is the point that you register this out for the first I respect your opinion and I appreciate you calling and I love the fact that you listen we can differ on the things I love that okay and because you have unique name. I do remember that we we chatted, but the focus is not on the present has or hasn't done us a whole other subject.

Focuses which driving impeachment process and and I've heard what I understand to be blatant hatred towards him. Just like the Republicans that hated Barack Obama and I deny that and just like Charles Schumer talked about 20 years ago, the, the process of impeachment against Pres. Trump. Some of it was driven by hatred, that's me as well and explosively.

Let's continue the dialogue of if you agree with fail. If you think that it's unwise for us to use the word hatred and say that that many Democrats are involved.

Impeachment process again. God knows who I totally agree fail you don't know some of Sussex had conversation fail. I have my wife before coming here is that we don't know somebody's heart, but she has no question that people many hate Donald Trump so you agree with fail. You think that's bad terminology that I'm just kinda picking up the media saying playing into it as a follower of Jesus, which is unwise or that there is blatant hatred of Trump and and that that's what's driving so much impeachment process say thank you for listening and weighing in and different with me. I honor that and I respect that and I appreciated 866-34-TRUTH. Let's go to Raleigh, North Carolina David, what's your take on on calling witnesses for the trial where I need all the witness I call abide in you want to, but people completed. Did you think of an amazing David is just coming out for second. Hopefully we can.

Start. Can you give me a reason why we shouldn't have witnesses is a minute seems self-evident that yeah whatever everybody wants everything to come to the lights.

Let's do it. Could you think of any valid reason not to have witnesses now why witness I would be able to come forward you. I thought for sale. A lot of people by people who haven't gone or and people were not in favor of Nick impeachment got going and then even a Republican all week. There's so much here that we would have been about the I don't think there will be not more more art like the annulment clot, then indeed a very bright Davidson jump in the degree was dated the president's lawyer says is no basis for this is so. Now this travesty and to call witnesses, his hair white houses of the recent David, thank you for laying in 866-34-TRUTH file. The line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown get into the minor fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown leave that witnesses should be called fish before trial witnesses called on both sides.

Perhaps taking a period of couple of months maybe to sort through all of this is a just a drain on the nation is is is that just unnecessary when it's a foregone conclusion that the president will be in quick acquitted by the Senate, just like it was going be a foregone conclusion that the house would vote to impeach.

We think 866-34-TRUTH let me say again so we can differ on these things and still unite as followers of Jesus, we can differ in our particular take on these volatile issues and still seek to love our neighbor as ourselves that we can still seek to win people to the Lord and work together for the larger purposes of the gospel and stand for life and family, liberty, and those things that are important in our culture, we can do all that while differing on these issues.

There is an article that was posted on the Federalist website and this is just while Terry's third Democrats hate Trump more than they hate terrorist kill Americans Democratic 2020 candidates and outspoken celebrities jump through hoops to use the death of the world's most violent terrorist to attack Trump so how much of the process of impeachment is driven by hatred caller in the last half hour said that I shouldn't judge people's hearts are soon to know what's in people's hearts are that people hate the president's affair position to take MI judging wrongly in my reading things into people's heart motivation that isn't there. This this seems self-evident to me and tell me if you agree or not, 866-34-TRUTH and what will get to your calls about witnesses and got a very fascinating quote from 80C, one of the more outspoken liberal politicians today of Custer Cortez. Interesting quote wanted to share with you in in a bit. Not to bash her but to to give a further perspective, but will get your calls about should witnesses be called in with you agree with me about hatred and not that this is self-evident to me right that we know what Jesus says in John 15. If you are of the world, the world would love you because you are not of the world of culture out of the world there for the world will hatred so we understand that even if we are the nicest, sweetest, kindest people on the planet we really live as followers of Jesus will be hated by the world right.

We know that we understand that that is gonna happen. Inevitably, will you be more Christlike than Christ.

If the world crucified him, and I know that Nancy Pelosi has said, quote, was raised in a Catholic. I'll have to guess we don't hate anyone not anybody in the world don't you accuse me I don't know it's in her heart. I don't know. I know that one day she was very somber, dressed in black about impeachment and then the next day she was celebratory and gloating and handing out souvenir pens God will judge her heart just like a judge.

My heart in your heart if you listen to this broadcast for 10 years, you've hardly heard me mention represented Pelosi's name over the years because this is primarily not focusing on political issues or political issues that I feel are important that we talk about we do talk about the beer right but I am not the resident Democrat basher the resident Republican defender if you listen irregularly you know that this seems self evident to me. Number one the same way the world loves its own that same principle okay if Donald Trump was a Democrat that he would not be opposed just like hated the way he is by fellow Democrats. Conversely, if Barack Obama had been a Republican and holding to Republican values. He would not have been as disliked revolved hated by many Republicans self-evident partisan politics, purely little football game you cheering for the one team you're booing the other team. The other team makes a play controversial now. Bad call bad call that one can start seeing kids our team versus their team. That's how we often think and see things. Number one Donald Trump defeating Hillary Clinton elections. That was a shocker that creates a lot of animus towards him so he could do that. Who thought he would do that and she was as good as in select rates animus towards that's one to his policies very much opposing the legacy Barack Obama very much opposing the Democrats, so his policies will get him animus, dislike, hatred, and then the way he operates very offensive to many. Just think if he was on the other side of he wasn't your guy if you didn't like his policies if he wasn't fighting for things important to you. Thanks, Rudy smooth asking for seasonal libraries rather yellow because issues with this.

Be honest.

Can we be honest with ourselves so to me when you put these three things together is when the election is is opposing the legacy Barack Obama and the way he is the type of person is the fighter and nasty mean-spirited the way he can be. That's going to create a lot of hatred towards him and to me that's what's driving the impeachment process more than anything to me that's the self-evident differ that that's fine. Again, God knows every heart individually, but will talk about this and elicit all through the impeachment process. We hardly talk about.

I told you the beginning when I can focus on it here and there a way in.

But we will not get impeachment fever in the second. We are stopping every so that if you want that every single day glistened with other conservative talk radio host, or watch online. Read the articles. We will wait and from time to time. Today as well as times 866-34-TRUTH.

Let's go to rock in Archdale, North Carolina. We are flooded with North Carolina costed a terrific what your take I could… Mark Dalton Arthur thank you's are. I do believe that witnesses may be called the spring is playing out as they is a trial of a legal trial that has to take place. And I think it really needs to be played. The way that all through it in your wall would be called rebuttal witnesses so that things can be brought out into the light and great evangelical Republican government believed our country and our president of the parents that you were just making. I firmly believe and that's been my take on my all along he is not your typical person for the position it easy and PD is not a politician person is a businessman and and at the level of all status that he has obtained through his life. He has done what was necessary and he is carry that over into the president is not a party to make heart surgeon and that's one of the things that made that I've been impressed by the member, whether I agree with not depending on what the subject matter. By day he is not afraid might call and he's not afraid to make his opinion even though it may rub against your cut against the grain in the wrong so it is hard to bring things into the lie that they are really believe that this makes to play out the way that it would in any other court of law otherwise are solid, be the Republicans shut it down. I didn't bring with gooseberry and I will never know what the truth was all the way that the Senate handles the rock want what you think that the president's season. He just wants a quick process when understand and just wants everything dismissed and not the calling of witnesses and everything else well just speculation on my part, I could just really want to get back to business. It brings things like this are distraction, no doubt about all you have to do is read the news. Listen to what's being said on TV and the spring is been out there for quite a long time that you are just one of the biggest things that irritates me the most with this whole process is what I hear legislatures say that this was an employee, or the man took all though he was not supposed to win the election.

This was a total upset and this this obviously calls burning student leader in the euro Democrats to beat the later programs to policy the expectations were Hillary Clinton had one and I think he is going to go away to get back to the business of the country. I hate rock.

I appreciate you weighing in laying things out you agree with rocks position which are take 866-34-TRUTH. Let's flooded with North Carolina calls Statesville, North Carolina David, welcome to the line of fire which are take out, go ahead and help yeah go ahead please.

My big question actually start one outline to be drawn away, I'm wondering how much how many tax dollars have been trying to brown him up and get him out of office. He took office. How many tax dollars that things would be aluminum everybody's mind on that level.

If they look at anything throughout our entire history and our government.

None of them have been not corrupt, they have all done something that's going to call some type eyebrow to be right and it somewhere there crooked you know what I mean it's just the totality of every common personnel mean blue-collar worker. Whatever. And I'm not the most politically intelligent personal bonhomie, but the big patriot league Melanie.it's obvious that you make this country better economy, job right coming to. He has not done it with Blair, but the man got good and he stood up for what he needed what he believed in and made it better start trade art in our country being even with other player that bound alkyl to go on write your view, then, to go along with an extended trial and to call witnesses is to needlessly dignify a process that never should have happened and then to further drain America to to drain the the Congress from doing what it's supposed to be doing to waste more taxpayer money. Why even engage in hey David, I appreciate that the comments very much. Thank you for listening calling in 866342 all right not enough time before the break to get your calls if you appreciate our broadcast and want to partner with us and help us expand our reach online video, radio, and so many other ways become a patriotic supporter go to patriot on.com PAT or EO and.com/Esther to Brown SK dear Brown when you do not know you partner with us to shape and shake the nation bonus. This is for pennies a day $10 more per month to join us patriotic.com/PSK are ground. It's the line of fire with your host activist, author, international speaker and theologian Dr. Michael Brown voice of more cultural and spiritual revolution get into the line of fire now by calling 866343 here again is Dr. Michael Brown a few months ago asked to come on to talk about that certain point during the interview, I realized that it sentence of my host himself or herself or forget exactly what was speaking with was trance and when I began to explain some of my positions the interviewer express express complete shock was unaware that people still held to these views on my world. That's the normal view but in the interviewer's world. Their view was so. On the other side of things that they were shocked it to hear and what I say they that some transgender accommodations.

They because of the rivers male or female. That individual was shot and only bigots and hateful people hold views like yeah you're just telling Marge.

I know many a whole believes that the more I thought wow it's one thing to hold to the view. It's another thing to think that your view is the view and virtually the whole society agrees with it. It's in that context, I want you to hear this clip from Alexandra Cust to Cortez during an interview and she describes her view of the Democratic Party today. Hard and turn or center conservative party that is utterly remarkable. There is there is nothing center or conservative in terms of the major platforms of Democrat party on the government level it's expanded government is leaving much more through the socialist view of things in a capitalist view of things and beat healthcare. Other things like that or overtaxing or sharing wealth, etc. it's positions on abortion are far left its positions on LGBT activism or far left its positions on on church which the state are far left but to me it seems that in her world left is so much further to the extreme that she sees the Democrats as left as they become they become far more left is far less conservative far less centrist it in in recent years especially reaction to Pres. Trump there campaigning further and further over. For example, of for VP Biden's had to adjust some of his views now, to be more radically leftist it to stay in step with the other candidates their positions at extreme that have not been advocated on this level by a party and in my memory.

All right, so to me that just reflects that in her circle. Her worldview is so far to the left that she could see the Democratic Party as left-leaning as it is now is center conservative that tells you something 86634 back to the phones Dan in Charlotte. Welcome to the line of fire. Dr. Brown think they might call you. My comment was a lot more on the county, Trump engagement and yeah if they were really about true while why wouldn't we be allowed to call witnesses there really get that the matter record. I really think that you know unity on both. I like depending on which side you want to agree with happen to believe have a lot of different opinion one way or the other blood what Everybody call witnesses get on the matter of public record, where if anything is actually found to be not truthful in their penalty for doing that because I mean, we also have to thought they like even coming from a conservative background, the barbiturates, we gotta stop saying things like, trumpeted a nontraditional candidate for being the most truthful that we can be you can agree with some of his policies and you can agree with the is that they didn't do that with a conservative mindset, but the fact understand the man of the pathological liar and there is a kind of a consequent to be paid for that and were staying out of our the reactive left. I can agree that some of that might be an inner overcompensation. But you know it does say that there is not a reason to dislike Trump who met at the heart from a Christian perspective as well.it's a Dan thank you for weighing in loudly and clearly, 866-34-TRUTH of its go to Helena in Virginia. Welcome to the line of fire alarm creek error better tired of arguing politicking rendering everybody back in doing that for a Carter haircut. This man learned there doing a good word the Lord are blessed in the back of the Lord want it.

Got it hate. Thank you for weighing in 86634. Let's go back to North Carolina Winston-Salem. Richard you're on the line of fire about my call correctly. I like day, and I agree with you, and you always been really fair. Handed about the legislate spirituality. No Christian need to do what God called you. And if we do that will take care of on the plate, but I do think of the lady of Democrat earlier talking about you know the word of faith that you Democrat the Fed this time and time again over and over again like he was going to her well this is what the parties stand for but you may well you know you not banding with departed clearly with a thick and I just want there to be fairness about it if they want to call with the food and everything you know about five know the let B that way to validate you to believe a lot easier to believe a lot and pick her to believe it. But when you have thought like Alan Dershowitz is a law professor and stuff you know a liberal when a man like that, but you know there's really no ground here. Impeachment is not mine right now and go back to the beginning of the beginning of it what you like Trump or not, you have to admit that from the time he was elected people been trying to get rid of been able to presently do all the things and and have been given a fair shake by the media know the moa report.

Leslie Rick move about the other and not present on and I'm not defending you, but I think if you look at everything out of a hole. You know the guy is not been treated and abiding in the field believe that the whole Democratic strategy affect crop. We don't have anything positive for America but would affect crop.yeah Richard, thank you sir for weighing in. I appreciated 866-34-TRUTH. Let's go to Brown's Summit, North Carolina Noah drawn the line of fire at all. After the Cavanaugh hearing confirmation. I think fairness with throughout the window. The we all know, even after this trial doesn't really matter of this be something out at the May I thing like they like on the ferry, but people being held accountable first and only not making false statement we all like that this network is not Cavanaugh hearing watching that I don't think bread and every a fair shot bar that goes all right melt from Alexandria call witnesses in the barrel about law, but the topic of government have to be on the one thing after another.

Whereat yet all clear know I appreciate that and that then would be the answer for why not call witnesses, why not go through that whole process because the whole thing becomes a circus and it just ends up being used for partisan politics and doesn't really accomplish anything he know what thank you for weighing in. Let's go to anonymous caller from some no we won't go there again. Please every body listening, watching, taking this in, please hear me. If you are my brother or sister in the Lord. If you will be with the Lord and with me forever them are in this together right and and God has a strategy for his people, which transcends politics. It doesn't omit politics, but he transcends politics, so let us refuse to give the enemy a foothold. Let us be able to say I differ with you my call earlier or sister fail different if I saw her. I'm sure we have a warm embrace price from Ford's brothers and sisters develop hearty handshake. Great to meet you and we can talk about the things of Jesus, so let's not allow the enemy to get a foothold here have your differences you haven't deeply but America needs the church United in Jesus more than we've been united in the past for going to see hope for the next generation of art Lisa in Dallas Texas your last so we got about a minute go right for right now right now.

Hector and I are pregnant With my prayer and adherence to correct any ground and an elected, he proclaimed, cry and time think that you can try out her nonbeliever to keep Koester marrying challenging his behavior and I think that he dad proclaim God's word. I think it is Christ as Lord and that is the most important thing any candy right now I can think is that my chairman Lisa, thank you for the call and can we agree on this point that proclaiming Jesus is Lord and living under his Lordship is the most important thing that we can do today and that America needs us as his friends is getting heat up. Let us rise as conflict stands, witnesses