Biden’s New Press Sec: Pro-Israel Conference “Severely Racist”

Sec. calls a pro-Israel yearly basis to a state lawsuit against the disinformation broadcast in human form and now this is what I hear from you. Following June sake, beginning on May 13, Kareem Jean-Pierre, she's been the deputy press secretary Sue Cedar a sub for a make you some history there. She's the first black print White House press secretary first openly gay White House press secretary but she defends the Islamic world, the pretty extreme in the Islamic world because her past which she worked for MoveOn.org. She went after an pro-Israel group in America that is very bipartisan AIPAC, which is not a get is that a hard right or hard left group extremely bipartisan. Joe Biden spoke about it before many Democrats. Barack Obama spoke about it before, but she called this group a pack quote severely racist and not progressive, so if you're not progressive, you're also a bad organization. She went on to say the organization has become known for trafficking in anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric while lifting up his lava phobic voices and attitudes always have this question two as the is a a gay black woman this you want to really live in the Islamic world.

What is she tight with his lava phobia.

Should she be speaking out about the Islamic world and a lot of these dictatorships that would not recognize her. And it might even criminalize and most do most criminalize her personal life.

So I say that say that it is just because they have this obsession on the left would be anti-Israel, even when it's totally hypocritical yet.

So you gotta situate that that these pics are fascinating to me and I'll tell you why they're fascinating to me.

You got Donita Janco. It's in the in the truth board.

You've got a new pic for the White House this the this the present spokesperson who is well known with this language I mean this is not anything new.

She's been very clear on this kind of anti-Israel approach and is Jordan's that we were joined by Jeff Bauman from her office in Jerusalem and the next thing the broadcast. But this is someone this is an organization that is very much center I mean, some would say centerleft, I mean so if that's considered extreme. Could you imagine what they would consider the conservative Jewish organizations. When this is what this is what you're dealing with and using the unraveling of the accomplishments in the Middle East. Although some of the sadistic of the countries know what's best.

But you have to understand the statement the way that one statement that you made will let swordplay take a listen on the lateral wrong I love my parents point of care for the American with the American dream is not to call our ally Israel and organizations that support Israel, even ones that are center as extremists, but this is goes back to I want to play that by because whatever the previous administration was for this administration's against that's right. I mean it. So if if again even though Joe Biden the past would go to replied AIPAC it would not likely elevate someone who use that kind of rhetoric against the group he would consider freely with calling them severely racist. There's not much worse.

You could call a group in America that severely racist but your elevating these kind of individuals they are going to be setting the tone. So while there's terror attacks occurring in Israel.

They've had a vortex of they've seen the last couple years. 19 people killed over the last few months with Islamic terror attacks when you elevate these individuals to be your spokesperson to be your press secretary for the White House for the commander-in-chief. The most powerful office of the world would you put in place needed Janco. It's Roger disinformation board is up and she's up purely partisan actor with no experience in combating criminal organizations like cartels or real Russian hacking.

This sends a message to who you are and also sends a message to your adversaries and your allies will be right back. Here's my press secretary Zachary Jean-Pierre remembered she's been the deputy's you seen her before as she analyst. She comes from the hard left world of MoveOn.org. She wrote this about AIPAC in 2019, encouraging Democrats to boycott the event they did not buy the way people like Barack Obama to this event. Joe bided to this, the Republicans attend the event that's how bipartisan is it's a group in America is to support Israel that wants to make sure it's not support our boats sides but for major political parties and sometimes it's criticized by the pro-Israel groups are being too bipartisan and not strong enough yet for Kareem Jean-Pierre who is going to be the White House press secretary is ace. This is her words quote severely racist.

His lava phobic rhetoric has proven just as alarming. The organization has become known for trafficking in anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric while lifting up his lava phobic voices and attitudes it. She called on Democrats to skip the AIPAC conference so Jeff Bell about his senior counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice inner office of jury in Jerusalem is in Jerusalem right now. Jeff universal. Let's talk about AIPAC. This is not exactly a conservative Jewish organization. I think by many standard balloon over very very party door compared to be bipartisan to the degree that often it will push hard against our to aggressive move director R with somehow that will get in the way of Democratic court that had long been very very from the Democratic she claimed a peck of partisan if the repair to get back in at that eccentric organization. I was basically left so she would inject the question is here, so she knows this to so why would you make the statement about AIPAC now she's the press secretary right. Why would you make the statement that they are severely were AIPAC is severely racist which is not true if the if she views AIPAC is severely racist.

I I shudder to think what she thinks of the you know the conservative groups will move all the overcoming of the window about what reasonable discussion so hard lack that are completely likable. By the way you are annoyed about their but you know within a month or two of that piece you wrote planet slandering Israel organization they made their first political endorsement in the election. You know they were you and Omar and Rashida played right, who are known for their weekly and practically knocked up, and I agree with and that could mimic rhetoric and excitement to her organization leader political endorsement for Jay Bickley.

Each symptom of the problem that people thought oh well departing the Democratic Committee become the left argument work but maybe two extreme, but it's okay Joe Biden moderate belt it will hurt their people in key part of administration are putting forth the claimant's dejectedly daffy. This is nice, very similar to having a lot. Omar is you White House press secretary is the third factor views which which she's written about this being her views this anti-Israel calling a as we set a very bipartisan pro-Israel group extremely racist trafficking in anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric severely racist. It is the similar kind of terms that you hear from ill hot Omar and Rashida to leave and it's that bizarre liberal activism. Jeff was to me and makes so since she is a big, talented, and that's wonderful for the Noosa first black person to be the White House press secretary but also the first LGBT person to be a White House press secretary and yet she's leveling these attacks on Israel, a country which would welcome her a lot a countries not like these countries which she's calling you know that were big. His lava phobic about which would criminalize her lifestyle. Islamic phobic anti-Muslim, that we cleared that AIPAC but a packet felt going out of the way to applaud those are the Muslim nation that didn't make that right. Critical normal for Israel and actually partnership in printed form ones now, thanks to the station and it will record what you Islamic country literally here ". When her and live alert, and therefore I think both of the category of what happened you know will be essentially libeling all things Jewish.

So my friend are friendly US ambassador Israel. David Freeman was on the phone which is two days ago blasted him in a Twitter saying the mainstream media forgot to mention that she hates Israel. So with all the accolades she's getting. It is historically point out spokesperson. The fact that she is spewing anti-Semitism and anti-Israel rhetoric that gets a pass in the media. Jeff wonderful who are people thinking feeling on identity probably will allow ongoing people who don't interrupt the issue here is that like you and Omar. She can't be criticized because she is black most the morning. No creeping critic Dr. Derek deputy except the people that they themselves are criticizing Israel think if I click on that date, the Jewish state, and that usually seem to have it if they treated quickly than every other nation. They basically claimant support the Jewish state anti-progressive, and they want progressivism to further just because of the Abraham records what you got these predominantly Muslim countries of the Gulf states.

Who are these kingdoms in Iraq emirates and working together now with Israel business deals there doing the Saudi's are investing in Israel as as we speak right now it's is if the these these anti-Israel activist live in the past and they wanted they want to. I get returned to that past, but ignore the progress that's been made. The fact that these countries are doing business together now and edit it away. I think it's like they want to want to account they want to cause trouble. They would like to see it into the Abraham records because it doesn't fit their political narrative progressive elected those very country for normalizing the digital making big talk about your deployment and execute against AIPAC literally keep fighting the effort. Medicare part a bit of bringing truly a story pay for the first time since Israel's creation of war and now Arab Moslem Arab country are flocking to make a warm, friendly people, Israel, and they hated holiday like they like Iran, they watched. They want to exclude Iran bill which we understand and glide path to a nuclear Iran very clear and in an airport there fighting anybody else fighting the Saudi UAE. The Bahraini equity Islamic. We help each in the Middle East is their enemy.

You got stores that she should really be talking about that we were being treated around the world including the Muslim world and Afghanistan where the Taliban is re-announced that the women must cover their faces in public or face face of retribution discussing education for women. It looks like you get fired for your job that's just the beginning for the Taliban so instead of focusing on those issues of where there are problems of the Islamic world, though it's it's labeling a group like AIPAC which means if she thinks that they are severely racist and trafficking in anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric. I wonder what terminology she would come up with for us at the bear can psychologically imagine that me like doing just said gentlemen Afghanistan now that the Taliban announced that the girls high schools were shut down last month and you don't you note in verse nine states leaves Afghanistan and in the disaster zone but at the end of the day Jeff you're in Jerusalem right now.

What's the to tender their politically as things are kinda moving back and forth the government's situation. Like the fact that you know why I came here looking for for a filter here in Jerusalem in 100 things that I noticed what I'm here and thinking about it I would commuting along to the street here and forget about politically portrayed in the Western media hear what you feel. Honestly regarding terrible, terrible, terrible time to time but mostly this is the one point one point around the world are coming to America, we see people doing our mother Christian all living completely comfortably off the ice cream shop will cook your people in other countries in the region against this one country so open and so warm and welcoming in scope multicultural incredible contempt of the political situation where you click it is always been an interesting government. The new government did nothing new anymore. There are people looking acutely aware parents. But you know what requesting an escape for healthcare great deal of time in question, keep popping up here because I just about bouncing accounts for the ACLJ in office in Jerusalem that office fully operational and obviously a lot going on there and this was just an interesting note today and I like what you understand to folks is this the kind of people go by getting into his top circle, so he tries to flip that modern card. He is no moderate use be rubbed by the radical of the radical left anti-Israel left. This is the season that the leftist that again see he was a Israel supporter as extremely racist. Second, we told you we are preparing for the latest battle for life after that leaked draft opinion for the US Supreme Court. It all the news the protesting over the weekend the protesting of justice houses, even some of the protesting guy getting Violet a Molotov cocktail throated to a Wisconsin pro-life groups are building say if abortions are safe that you are either was spray-painted across that building, but were also prepared for a political move in the sit it because Hardeep Pascal's representatives said sclera pastor give the Senate attempting to before this opinion even comes out that could overturn Roe versus Wade to codify that beast to put into law as legislation, the right to abortion, and the rights under Roe versus Wade which we know Joe by this pledged he would side into law.

There's two questions. Of course, politically, is the political question do they have the votes yes but they don't have the votes to overcome that the legislative filibuster literally don't think so. Would they know they are the 60 vote ship with… Do they have enough votes to get rid of the legislative filibuster so there's there's political questions. There we also told you we were to look at the legal issue as well. We got this for even on air today. On Friday we got this to all the Senate staff because there to be dealing with this immediately idiot to have housestaff as well. Our legal analysis of whether or not Congress actually has the authority to put Roe versus Wade or abortion Wednesday Roe versus Wade is God to put abortion as a legal right protected federally as the statute as a statute and we got a legal doubts is often ACLJ that are very important analysis here because what we found might be surprising to a lot of those are the pro-abortion side so that movies could be at the opinion sticks in the all indications it was from the leaker is that it's going to there is this move to have. To federalize a statutory right to abortion. In other words, basically a codification of Roe versus Wade.

Now we have immediately dispatch both our government affairs teams and our lawyers to look at this issue to determine if in fact what was declared unconstitutional in a minute before then the House and Senate try to pass legislation codifying role when we believe that were set for a legal challenge if they attempt to do this in any you feel like Reviewing the legal memorandums in our lawyers put together were in good standing.

To do that we are we are in good standing and we have good news were in good shape legally to challenge any laws Congress may attempt to pastor codify that is making to written law Roe V Wade and Casey versus Pennsylvania everybody's asking if the Supreme Court declares Roe not to be a constitutional right.

The notion that ended goes back to the states, but this is an attempt to federalize that try they want to make a federal constant. They want to make a federal law where there is no federal constitutional provision allowing it the Constitution. If this opinion turns out to be the leaked opinion turns out, in fact be the opinion of the court and I began reading this and analyzing and there is no federal constitutional right to abortion is murder and murder is punishable by states, I prosecuted a lot of murder cases Congress cannot punish felonies generally speaking that is part of the police by the states and I am convinced that since that if this turns out to be the opinion of the Supreme Court, in point of fact that nothing that the Congress can do can change what the Constitution says and that is exactly what our analysis shows so but Jordan is no question that the house I'm in Senate right now are evaluating this that this boat could come up folks.

Wednesday they're gonna vote on it that the questions get a B is they can't get to the legislative filibuster so we know that their initial vote will fail because you got a filibuster.

So first, I'll take that vote will get a sense of how many there's a couple of competing pieces. There's what, it's not quite as extreme that comes from Lisa Murkowski of Susan Collins to Republicans and there's what it's more extreme, except for the Democrats.

I don't have to be a vote on both. But they will take a vote. We will get a sense of how many votes do they have is it 50. What is it 52 to codify Roe versus Wade. Then there they're going to lose the filler but they're gonna lose reading culture to this gift so we know they don't have 60 votes. So the question will then be how soon are they willing to act and are they willing to act to take a vote on ending the legislative filibuster, which returned the U.S. Senate to just the House of Representatives with less with less members so we are deploying all of our resources literally right now both legislatively our government affairs office in Washington as well as our legal teams now. The Congress will try to utilize three constitutional provisions us with a site in the legislation. The necessary and proper clause section 5 of the 14th amendment and the commerce clause in any army was neither unknown of those. All three of those fail to support that kind of legislation that's tried. You can look at the necessary and proper in the constitutional clause. All those have always been used in the past to justify federal legislation and in areas where you wouldn't think that it would otherwise exist.

But the fact remains that that if the Supreme Court overruled Roe and Casey there would be no constitutional right for Congress to enforce under the Constitution and state laws that declare abortion to be illegal in all or most circumstances. If those come out spec they will would be fully consistent with the federal Constitution. Once that is the case that I don't care what Congress passes they cannot usurp the power of the states and that remains in the hands of the people, but give me the caveat. The caveat is if they pass this body will sign it present by multimillionaires, and in any wording to be happy. Prepared working the states, and other entities to challenge this in federal court in a B in federal court challenging it because the present United States necessities and assign the bills that are going to be passed if there passed by the other by the Senate and the House become law willing to be fighting in the states we fought in the federal courts and against Casey again. Sharon now returning.

I will be turning our attention to the states and fighting the federal courts in each of the states. That's why we we will fight that battle if we have to fight that battle was got the legal analysis are irrelevant. It would be so much better to beat this legislatively, and here's why. Because of Roe versus Wade is overturned by court. The court decision to the Supreme Court. That's ultimately released what we would rather have is the battle in the states. Go to the voters directly go to the American people directly state-by-state to talk about what laws they want in their state what restrictions they want in their state what they're comfortable with. So it's a state-by-state approach. If instead of continuing to fight the abortion battle in federal court, which is been going God to section 73. So in a sense they would be prolonging the battle in a friendlier space which is the federal court system that it would be going to the states where it's really going to be political decisions up to about what kind of restrictions they want to put in place yet still be some lawsuits. Those are good at those would fail pretty miserably under the current draft.

They be much different kind of battle legislatively.

That's the battle we want to have for hearts abides. We don't want to have is the battle stuck in Washington DC politics. You and Andy let Willie a minute here but we have to be part we are working hard legislatively to beat this, but we are already prepping the litigation unnecessary litigation is prep. We've gone a memorandum we've disseminated to the Senate were looking at this legally. We are looking at been preparing for the fights that are going to ensue in each of the states that that are going to the private inferences abortion or curtailing it. That's going to come to you know we have are liars and lawyers ready to come back.

The lies that are to be put out by Planned Parenthood by these other people that this account there is a constitutional right.

They are still lying to you folks leave abortion 48 hour limitations. Murder 48 hours ahead folks is going to be being just say that we develop for this broadcast ahead ACLJ.org back to normal. For decades ACLJ is been on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org where you can learn more about our life changing become a member today ACLJ keeping you informed and now is Jordan secular secularity or phone calls to as well.

At one 800 684 31 two that's what hundred 64 3110 we think about the new White House press secretary chosen by Pres. Biden, a Korean Jean-Pierre who is called pro-Israel groups even very mainstream bipartisan groups. Barack Obama spoke at the Joe Biden spoke at a call the severely racist and true trafficking in anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric that she would say this about a group like a pack. I just want you to imagine what terminology she would come up with what adjectives and adverbs.

She would use to describe your views on Israel at the fact that Joe Biden plays a moderate but is putting around to basically receive to leave and ill on Omar's like handpicked people. The most radical of the radical left to represent his White House every day as White House press secretary would take your because of that 100 684 31 two. There's a lot be made about her breaking barriers. The color barrier that her sexuality that she is lesbian. It said that that is the first time you have a bias for six days a lesbian and black but she's again demonizing pro-Israel groups and they talk about his lava phobia in the Islamic world.

She would not be recognized effect her lifestyle would be criminalized but they still these are liberal activists at their core, that they focus and they don't care about that the actual rationale. They focus it on their hatred of Israel. So we got her in place. Reductive record now in the next segment broadcast. We got Nita J.

Courts in place as the disinformation czar at the Department of Homeland Security all who are just committed harvested actors indent that's what concerns you most his sister. DHS is putting people law enforcement positions who are committed partisans yet. Don't forget, we filed a freedom of information act request against DHS to find out about this implementation of this Board of Governors for misinformation nation and disinformation. By the way, Louisiana and Missouri have filed a federal lawsuit on that were looking at that very carefully. We may be filing in that case were reviewing it now.

It's just always filed late Friday were looking at that we may file in that case as well. We already have the freedom of information act request out to the various department of homeland security agencies to find out how this started, and frankly, the more they say about this committee, the worse it is.

I mean that there they do not have the caveat about limiting who it applies to so you still have this anything to be misinformation the disinformation they make the decision. That's right, and their only previous examples of their work in this world with before they had this disinformation board would have nothing to do with who they put in place. Anita Jake which would be qualified for the job they talk about working against cartel disinformation that were talked about working against Russia hacks on our nation's infrastructure that she's about it out spreading the Russian hoax and political talking points, not about actually combating actual criminal activity River. She's the one was to go after all full but lawful speech.

So what if you want to go after lawful speech. So even though it's lawful if needed. Jake, who asked if that deems it awful this this disinformation board is good to go to social media platforms and tried again.

Have them put in content moderators for exactly the terms of words and phrases and ideas that they want silenced you Altace on the phones when you look at this lawsuit.

They claim in violation of the First Amendment. Number two, excess of statutory authority been a violation administrative procedures act in violation of the ministry procedures act by HHS and DHS were looking at acuity ACLJ obviously focusing also on the boat that could take place as early as Wednesday on codifying road. This comes in light of the leak of the Supreme Court decision very active time at the American Center for Law and Justice were glad we can bring you this broadcast each and every day and all of these different platforms that radio station satellite radio support the work of theaclj@aclj.org will take your calls at 800-684-3110 a lot of things moving. Got a report today from our office in Jerusalem were looking at legislation on Rome on codifying road as early as Wednesday in the House and Senate were fighting that fighting the information board support the work of the ACLJ secular only thing difficult to what hundred 684 31 two that's what hundred 64th 110 record as our Senior advisor for foreign policy and national security. And we see this attack on speech by the Biden administration. We saw the announcement of the disinformation governance board led by Anita Jake away to a again is someone who has only partisan history and so they're saying the debris hurried to combat cartel disinformation and actual euro Russian cyber attacks our nation's infrastructure like real security items.

Since she has no expertise to that. She's a disinformation political expert is a that's how they call her but now, states are starting to speak out and take action.

We've Artie filed a FOIA we did it within two days of this announcement to get more information about the creation of this disinformation governance board. DHS is been playing catch-up putting out to pages out what it's God's doing what it doesn't do would now see the lawsuit by our two states, Missouri and Louisiana against Pres. Biden top administration officials for colluding with the social media companies. The content platforms to censor and suppress free speech. I would go to Rick Rundell this right away Rick because Rick we've all experienced this.

I'm glad the stators are ours are starting to stick up for their citizens because all of us in the conservative world have experienced this kind of de-throttling or censorship by the major social media platforms declare that there is this system now where being attack in Washington DC. Press newsrooms and the Democrats all have an narrative and disinformation means dissenting information dissenting from the official Washington DC line.

It's very dangerous.

This is what Third World countries do is when they don't like the information when it's dissenting when it different than what they want. Then they label it, you know that information or threat to democracy. It's really a threat to their power. And so what we need to do is is push back on this disinformation. Dissenting information is really what it is and thank God we have ACLJ. Who is Johnny on the spot immediately filing these FOIA requests and for people to understand is that if you don't have a legal challenge immediately like a FOIA request, then you don't get anything done. You can talk about these issues in the media.

We can complain publicly we can complain on social media, but unless you really take them illegally on you just don't get stuff done and so I'm really thankful that ACLJ is so quick to push back and hopefully people recognize that we need support for that, Rick. The shocking aspect of this, at least to me has been good. I mean, could you imagine the circumstance where under your administration present from when you were DNI and you will Rick have a meeting and you did maybe call your lawyers and we come in and to set up a truth board were to set up a department governing board to determine what is truthful and what is information or misinformation or disinformation organist that does board up and they will decide this. The left would be going ballistic which we would expect, and they should but they do it in the binder ministration doesn't hear and the media barely barely the mainstream media points that I will say, Jake Tapper, Jake Tapper from CNN and I was glad to see this racing series questions. With this, but a form I've seen he's been it but this is a grave attack on free speech, but we had kind of 25.

40 years of politics, where most people in the country get to sit back and watch and they get to be observers and they watch as the partisans in Washington fight and the media kind of are the referee gone is that day and I hope that people that are listening understand that you gotta get off your house. You can't just watch anymore you every single day have to ask yourself what are you doing to help save this country and this attack on disinformation to support the ruling party is really a a a line that's been crossed, and so far anyone listening to our voice.

We have a new system and that new system is all of official Washington controlling the message and and shame on us if we think that we can wait for legacy media to control this narrative.

They are not going to do it. We have to have entities like ACLJ you know it's interesting but adult dresses to both of you to to Jordan and to Rick so the Missouri Atty. Gen. and Louisiana Atty. Gen. filed suit against Pres. Biden top demonstrated officials for alleging in there alleging it colluding with social media giants sensor and suppress free speech and the two Atty. Gen.'s father suit against these individuals and there alleging that groups like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, are censoring suppressing free speech including truthful information. Topics like election integrity is now almost ban on these platforms, and other topics under the guise of misinformation and we know there's been like election integrity issues, but they want to band apart like 100 by laptop search for which was banned from social media which is no longer bad for social media.

The lab leak theory which was banned from social media data logger banned from social media as if we have to wait Rick for the mainstream media and the administration to say when it's okay to speak about instrument saw you at the Kentucky Derby or with present trumpet, the Kentucky Derby.

If you add your post a photo if you posted a video of present from speaking and just just a quick video and then posted that the social media there. Social media covers may have taken that that would have left.

I'm concerned that this ministry of truth grow through the Department of Homeland Security places will immediately put individuals who post something that they consider dissenting information, they are immediately going to put them on a list that they need a campfire. Maybe there on the no-fly list, which is done through the FAA may be there ATM card is gonna be frozen and they can use it until you take down the information that they call DS information dissenting information and I think it's incredibly dangerous. We weaned the knee-jerk reaction that Jordan is talking about from the media is to shut us down, and thank God the knee-jerk reaction from ACLJ is to file suit and to get to the bottom of the circus.

Rick, the one thing that will not. The one thing but the major thing that's of interest to me here in a concern to me is that of all the agencies they pick to do this, they picked the Department of Homeland Security, which is you know when I know and Jordan knows is a law enforcement agency is to protect the homeland and they give that they have set up this is called a board of governance and there can be working with these tech companies. So exactly what you said I meet.

I mean, you ran.

You are the director of national intelligence.

The idea that this would be set up a peopling understand it's going to go to these other government agencies.

Just like when the IRS was trying to target conservatives and went to the FEC and the DOJ departmental excursion to do the same thing you can count on Rick. There's no question about it and let me be very clear. There are members of the Trump administration who were told when they tried to open a bank account that there process their application need needed to be reviewed. That happened in the United States of America. Remember after January 6. The entirety of corporate media said we were pausing on giving money to Republicans that was their initial reaction for menopause on any donations to Republicans after January 6. This is a crisis of epic proportion.

And what we need to understand is that we can no longer expect Washington DC the media the lobbyist the newsrooms. Even some Republicans to defend us. We have to take people to court again. Thank God for the ACLJ, I see this, which is where they put the pressure. These concert providers and other social media companies but also Internet companies. As Rick is talking about. You could see how the consequences can Become severe very quickly.

So first starts off a baby silencing you on that. The platform then you can't use the payment processing, then you really can't use another.

You can't use your your Apple card and it to process or make a payment for or not you.

You give take it at some other platform because of your speech online in the idea again. They will pick and choose where to put the pressure wave and what to put the pressure on the social media companies, and Rick, these companies that are regulated by the federal government at they have been sober. They have bad track record on their own if they got the government tell you to do it.

That's like it gives them cover to even more censorship. You know right after the election when so many conservatives were canceled. There was this huge movement, and I thought from billionaires and others to say we need to have our own payment processing companies. We need to have our own cloud.

We need to move away all of that stopped when the pressure was off and I'm here to say we need to have our own entities that will not cancel last and we need to have organizations that immediately fight back with legal means and that is the only solution we can't trust these people in Washington. Shame on us for trusting them. I am I am really grateful that we have radio stations like we have that cover us that want to cover this information. I'm thrilled that we have now to social media which were on rumble for our our video so that we know were not getting sensor greatly appreciated folks. This tells you what Rick is very intuitive that the bigger battle and you having a place to go.

A cloud system that will be shut down because your political views of financial system that will be shutting you out because of your political view from the present by the outcome of most extreme political movement in American history was if you supported present trumpet or two to support the idea of America first the most extreme pro-Israel your sleepily racist as the White House press student admissions program at the college admission say is that while enough edges as we say right now it difficult enough for a lot of students to even get through the process but it's there are there are groups being targeted by institutions of higher learning by race to say. You know, we have too many of these have students to many Asian students at our school. Sabrina start making that a factor against their application and so we've actually filed its id out at the Supreme Court oral argument to be the fall. We have filed an amicus brief in this case before the court are protecting that again. It should be based on the students rates are true based on what qualifications the school is looking for whether to academically and other issues as well to get a good diverse student population. Yes of the case is called in the Supreme Court's case number 20 – 1199 students for permission versus Pres. and Fellows of Harvard College and students prepared mission versus University of North Carolina professor Harry Hutchison are part senior policy director is with a sincere count for the ACLJ he's on this brief as well. This is what they hissed what's going on here because this is now actually targeting. It seems like Asian Americans and abrasions. Generally, I think that's precisely correct and so if you look at the history you find that Thomas Jefferson favored a natural aristocracy based on virtue, we now live in an era that favors what might be called technocratic merit that is fueled the greatest transfer of wealth from the middle class to wealthy elites in American history male elite schools seem unwilling to share their wealth with Asian-American students in particular and they have instituted so-called preferential programs which actually discriminate against Asian students in an attempt to unjustly denying them prestige like other elite students. It's important to keep in mind that Asian-American students on average in high school. They study 2 1/2 times as much per week as other American students that hands them a terrific advantage in the competition for seats in elite universities and schools and so if you look for instance at Thomas Jefferson high school in Loudoun. I'm sorry in northern Virginia.

That is one of the most elite, if not the most elite high schools in America and from 2001 to 20, 22, there has been an enormous transformation in that school that has seen a huge influx of Asian students and so now there's a pushback there's a pushback of Harvard there's a pushback schools are discriminating against the put it in vernacular here is are these schools discriminating against Asian students absolutely and so what they are doing is that they are trying to broaden our own if you will.

The criteria on paper for admission. So for instance at Harvard. They should have suggested that Asian students perhaps will lack empathy. Empathy and that is one of the ways in denying them entry into Harvard, for instance, it is very much like what Harvard and other elite schools did about the job to Jewish students from about 1900 to the 1940s before the institution of standardized test so there so essentially schools like Princeton and Harvard.

They put a quota or a limit on the number of Jewish students admitted it's important to note as Thomas soul points out doing the research that when Jewish students first immigrated to the United States in the late latter part of the 19th century and the early part of the 20th century there standardized test scores when they were available were not necessarily all that hot, but over a span of 30 or 40 years if they did sensationally well in high schools throughout America but Harvard and Princeton said well we can only take a few so it's pure and simple racism that represents a world reversal of 1964 Civil Rights Act represents a reversal of all the antidiscrimination legislation in the United States.

This is a good at it. It's it's I don't people you confuse affirmative action cases, either because this is that this reverse of affirmative-action take your minority group of Asian students say were to limit the limit they were not working to try to figure out how we can bring more this minority group at all because there academically successful. They're going to take too many spots based off our other criteria and I think this is the issue with right but today it could be the. The Asian-American group to bar to be Hispanic students with received tremendous growth in the Hispanic community with education. There I could see move there similar to the Jewish students who maybe after couple of generations, their parents, putting a lot of emphasis on school education. So this idea that we allow these elite institutions to do this.

It is wrong. That is why the ACLJ decided to actually get involved in this case I think you're precisely correct and many of these elite schools engaged in what might be called a sleight-of-hand deception in order to try to get away with these discriminatory rules.

If you look for instance at the research of Dr. Roland Foxfire who is perhaps the brightest economists in America. He's an African-American.

He teaches at Harvard.

He has found that hard work pays off off and so he has taken disadvantaged kids African-American kids in New York City and he has emphasized how hard work – what they outperform white students in New York City.

So essentially the he is following what what might be called an Asian model you were really really hard to Asian students on average they study teen hours per week average American kids in high school and elementary school study on average five hours per week. So which group would you expect to excel and I think most Americans would say this is unfairness on steroids by these elite institutions who continue to discriminate against Asian-American students and I'm very happy to sign on to this brief, and I'm happy that the ACLJ has filed an amicus in this case there is a we said our summary of argument is that there's only one race of people. The human race. Institutional efforts to pigeonhole groups of people. Interracial boxes what Chief Justice Roberts called a sordid business which is correct incoherently in the hallmark is incoherent is a hallmark of racism and we take our legal arguments from their so folks look what we have covered today. Problems in Washington as it relates to Israel and Jerusalem offices working on that attempt to codify Roe versus Wade before the decision comes out because now the word actually rose could be overturned. Our government affairs office in our legal team legal team a litigation team already working on that.

We are looking at the distant permit. We bought up oil oil on the disinformation committee's board of governance and at the same time were reviewing the state of Missouri and state of Louisiana's lawsuit to see if we might engage on that and then today at the Supreme Court of the United States. We have filed a brief in this discrimination case on admission and at the same time we are working legislatively to try to defeat this attempt out the vote as early as Wednesday on codification of Roe versus Wade. It's Monday and that's what were working on. I encourage you stay up to speed on everything. It's all up in ACLJ.org to find all the information there including the broadcasted our work in ACLJ.org?