Deep State Corruption at the FBI Revealed, Michael Flynn Vindicated

This is the state corruption. The FBI revealed and Michael when vindicated, will talk about today on Jay Sekulow long line from Washington DC Jay Sekulow was an easy decision. Yes, I think easy because once I sold facts and some of the tactics used by the FBI in this instance and also the legal problems with the case. It was an easy decision. Phone lines are open for your questions right now. Call 1-800-684-3110. We haven't heard me and Bill bars were because everything is going on with another example shows, and now your holes secular may 2020 beginning so much new, much more. New information about Bob Muller's investigation about the attempted prosecution, illegitimate prosecution of Michael Flynn served our country for 30 years. General serve previous administrations both Republican and Democrat in top roles of thought that Adam shifts after that pressure from Ricker now would finally release the transcript of courses blaming the White House for the delay but remember last week reporting to you that he was holding onto. 10 of those transcripts and not letting the director of national intelligence team go through the declassification process on those 10 transcript. So how could they release all of them at the same time. By the way those included. We now have from Trump officials and Obama officials let everyone for you before you to Mike Flynn matter, former director of national intelligence, James Clapper testified under oath quote this is all before Bob Muller was appointed I never saw any direct empirical evidence of the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election or how about former acting director and then at the time deputy director of the FBI, Andy McKay.

He said there's a lot of information still reporting have not been able to prove the accuracy of all the information so you don't know if it's true or not any of it.

That's correct. McCabe replied that was used of course that information in the McKay and in the steel dossier that they couldn't verify any of Jim Combe even called salacious none verify the advisor warrants on American citizens who they were being told that the FBI this American citizen is a US intelligence asset quarter page. Let's look at what's happened in the last month this and last month the Pfizer worn process a total fraud on the American people and the dust just as Gorman acknowledged that it was fraudulent and that false information was given an affidavit should not of been signed and executed in the Pfizer warrants and diminishing, then we have the Justice Department correctly saying that what happened in general.

Flynn was outrageous was wrong and he should not of been prosecuted and they withdrew the case, then we have the release of the documents you just mentioned the limit.

I would be very clear on something here. I mean really clear. I said this on a special need we did yesterday with Facebook as soon as the general Flynn order was the motion was filed. The order hasn't come out yet and I said, this justice has been served. The actions of the special counsel against general Flynn were outrageous, the special counsel should be ashamed of the conduct of his agents and his lawyers that he allowed the Atty. Gen. and the Department of Justice are correcting a horrible wrong that with my official statement on this and that, frankly, is even downplayed with Bob Muller allowed to happen under his watch under his authority should never ever happen again in the United States. They should be ashamed. They should be embarrassed in the lawyers that did this fraud on the courts to pay a penalty having they abruptly quit the case. They were from special counsel's team were holdovers still prosecuting Michael Flynn but we get back. That is not over yet for Michael Flynn. Note that the court has to issue an actual order in the case withdrawing every guy can imagine a circumstance that Sullivan doesn't do that quickly when the justice department basically confessed their defenses and serious error on the part of their investigative team. The FBI and their attorneys for not bringing forward exculpatory evidence, including the, the special counsel to remember all that smart SCO seal was stamped on particular calls. We come back 1-800-684-3110 at 2000 684-3110 challenges facing Americans for substantial time in our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists. The ramifications of weighing 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the Obama care means to the pro-life in many ways your membership is empowering the right to life question free copy mission in life today online ACLJ/Jay Sekulow live so Michael Flynn in the Department of Justice and holding my hands right now this is that if you want to compare scope.

This is the government motion to dismiss crime criminal charges that they were prosecuted, so they're saying dismiss it because of the information that we had was faulty. What we did to Michael Flynn was wrong what Michael Flynn was talking about and brought up on charges was immaterial. So, not material, not important and not linked to any actual investigations that there is not a basis of a counterintelligence investigation to be going on in the facts and circumstances that existed at that time. We say that again the FBI concluded that there was no basis for a counterintelligence investigation to go McBee going on at that time.

Now interestingly, even though that was the conclusion we know that James Comey had sent to FBI agents because he thought he could get away with it jealously. He's now not to go interview Flynn and would shockingly go to Andy Cottam on this because Andy's or Sally Yates expert. Shockingly, Sally Yates said she was flabbergasted. Andy what you what James Comey did while the labor fall low probability of oral Apollo flabbergasted and dumbfounded that he would send to agents in their after the President was in office in order to interview Flynn without coordinating at first with the Department of Justice.

I believe she is simply covering herself. I believe he fully knew what Comey was doing and endorsed that I don't believe one bit. Here is we know the gym coming out because the transcription and shift this all ties into that to the 53 transcript released a few hours after the news about Michael Flynn.

Adam Schiff did fold and he didn't take weeks to do it like he was first reporting it took a day or two after the ritornello letter saying I'll release these and we find out in there that Sally Yates and Jim Comey guess who they were briefing about taking down Michael Flynn, Barack Obama in the Oval Office of the white the Obama White House. At the end of the days their term were still plodding on how to start takedown would be the top people.

The incoming trumpet medication because of that, you said it a number of times during the impeachment argument edit before the U.S. Senate the trial. This was about policy and it had nothing to do with crimes.

Criminality was about policy disputes.

They did not like the direction in which the President was in a take the country so what are they do they go after the people, the President was appointing Harry what you're reading that motion and on the Flynn matter what your conclusion is that what we have is astonishing misconduct by the FBI in conducting the tenure for January 24, 2017 interview in the first place. After all, the FBI had a word for word transcript the phone call between Flynn and Kissling that in their possession number to the FBI on January 4, 2017 concluded that there was no derogatory information to be had with respect to Flynn matter number three. There was no basis, at least in my opinion for launching an investigation of Lieut. Gen. Flynn on August 16, 2015. Keep in mind that on August 15 there was text messages between Lisa Paige and Peter struck confirming a lot that they had an insurance policy, and so the question becomes one of the Flynn investigation part of the FBI insurance policy and you put that on one side and then on the other side you look at James Clark per se.

There was no credible information with respect to collusion between the trunk campaign and Russia.

You have also the testimony of Andrew McKay saying essentially the same thing. So what we have. Our lives predicated on lot.

I and we have a corrupt case brought by Bob Mahler and so CNN analyst called the Department of Justice decision to drop the charges. The Kent Gen. Flynn, M astonishing assault on the rule of law because she saw that that was ridiculous, but Klapper was the DNI right director and ethnic national delegates details under oath to a congressional committee.

No evidence of collusion, but that's the DNI director of national intelligence and then Jordan may still continue with this broad investigation. I think yummy little red… This is under oath testimony. I don't recall anything up until the time she left office on January 20, 2017. I don't recall anything being briefed up to me. Just my recollection of this point is not that means she was even she saying she wasn't brief that there was no information given to herself. It was something mysterious like the incoming administration had conspired with the Russian government to steal the election. You think that the Atty. Gen., the United States would know about it that when you see more and more I think I go to Andy on this as well may be any first is that a lot of these FBI officials. I know what he does like to take Sally it's his work, but it looks like they were trying to keep this away from the DOJ officials as he was yes the end and we now know that Lisa Paige and Peter struck were cheering when they got this crossfire was it razor on on Mike Flynn before there was crossfire hurricane admit it, but it before was expanded in the crossfire hurricane. They were cheering because there would be no crossfire hurricane if they cannot continue this persecution is you can call it now.

This political persecution of Mike Flynn by the FBI there. If there was no crossfire razor there would be no crossfire hurricane but yet now Andy whether there tell the truth or not. In testimony a few years ago they were saying we had no idea about this under oath while local local that there was that there was little coordination between the FBI and the DOJ the FBI without on a frolic of its own making it so determination of the deed stated that he wanted to get rid of them.

But the reality is that Comey engaged met with Obama and decided that they wanted to get rid of the people that that doesn't trump was going to bring international intelligence and among the first of those was Gen. Flynn. I believe that, he was aware of the instructions where there was sub Solanki Ellen just link in the not Yates was aware of that to and they were all in this together and that includes the FBI and the Department of Justice and no one is there to convince me differently, Washington DC MAC partisan politics already met Adam Schiff with almost laughable response. The saying that this was delayed by the White House for year and transcription that the White House didn't want these transcripts coming out. Why would the White House not want transcripts coming out that the former director of national intelligence, James Klapper saying I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the trunk campaign or someone in it was plodding or conspired with the Russians to meddle with the elections or Andrew McCabe saying, had they been able to prove the accuracy they've not been improve accuracy of anything in the steel dossier. It's a panic mode response Jordan.

Plain and simple and you've talked about this many times the 10 transcript that he would not let the DNI send over the White House to finish the declassification process and yet now he wants to blame the DNI that the process did not complete.

He was trying to have it both ways been Jordan. Let me tell you, I think it is absolutely pouring in. Adam Schiff world because you look at the totality of all was released today work still going through thousands and thousands of pages but what you have is a consensus.

You have a consensus among anti-trump government officials that there was no collusion. I mean any McKay James Klapper Sally Yates Loretta Lynch Evelyn Farkas Susan Rice Ben Rhodes on down the line you go Jordan. They all say the same thing. They didn't see any evidence so I would tell you this. I've set on this broadcast many times.

Why did Peter Strock had the audacity to overturn the conclusion from the Washington field office in the general Flynn matter I said it was because director Comey was behaving the same way I Jordan, I think I undersold that because now we know conclusively from Sally Yates and Mary McCord and others. James Comey wasn't the end of the line here went all the way to the White House that has now been confirmed to play with Chuck Todd asked Adam Schiff. Okay, not ship, etc. these earrings are not yet not yet infected that had he started hearing she had not had his interview Joe transcription. Notice residency was doing getting a series ready. He had not had the interviews yet. Here's what Chuck Todd asked Adam Schiff circle all you have right now is a circumstantial case. I actually know Chuck like I can tell you that the case is more than that and I can go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence. Now what little I wanted out right total mother report River he did in his release yesterday about this people. He stilled still talk it will talk more about we get back still rely upon what was said but my mother said there was no collusion and cannot be an obstruction case and I think apples come out about Bob Bob Muller and Jimmy Flynn and the prize cases say about Bob Muller's credibility 000 in a variety work on his team feel bad for his law firm to hire those attorneys because they look like a joke right now wouldn't want the attorneys before the city fell, they were in bed with that the same attorney now okay 2000 684-3110 at 2064 3110. But in America you know it justice always wins out and takes time to justice just squints. We got a Atty. Gen. of the top of the Department of Justice was making sure that will be right back only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called mission will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question for copy mission in life today online/challenges facing Americans as time went are now free to store constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us.

ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ shift because everyone his whole world is falling apart. First of all his impeachment attempt was rejected by the U.S. Senate.

Present was acquitted. That was on Ukraine when he when he could use rush. Remember) use rush to because Bob Muller told him that there isn't anything here so couldn't can impeach on that although we still in his release yesterday.

Yes still relies on Bob Muller which to me is unbelievable. I was asked Harry about that with Harry the fact that Adam ship would still rely on Bob Muller after the Flynn mass and everything else is going on the last three months is unbelievable to me because what blindingly special counsel role was laughably incompetent.

It was launched on the basis that firing the FBI director constitutes obstruction of justice with respect to the Russia collusion story.

Even though backplane was constitutionally stuff back from the start. And secondly, we now know that all the players knew there was no credible basis for the Russia probe. In the first place, so there is plenty of evidence that Bob Muller's incline from what is illegally predicated and that is equally true with respect to the investigation of the matter. One of the things that astonishes me about Adam ship is that apparently he went to Harvard Law school in one of the things that he forgot to learn at Harvard Law school is to understand the underlying facts the facts do not support any of Adam Schiff's claim. Instead, the facts point to one thing and one thing only Bob Muller was one of the most incompetent individuals in US history with respect to occupying the special counsel's office so I would urge Adam Schiff to rely on someone else and certainly not on his own understanding and selling the people in the Obama ministration meeting of the Defense Department. She had the former deputy assistant secretary of defense Evan Parker. She goes on MSNBC. She says I have direct evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign in Russia when she was put under oath in these transcripts know what she says, quote I didn't know anything.

I was line she said was on. She didn't say she was line is I do not know anything at know anything is her dry run of her statement that you may publicly and in that I did not. I don't know you, she is. She said she had direct evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with the Russian government and the election under oath. I didn't know anything. When I made that statement she knows she made a false statement was the medial athletic trainer fostering to the media cheaply.

She was on the road. She was quickly told the truth, which was that she was playing politics. So anyway, what does this tell you I knew what it meant. This is this is like.

You can even make this up in a movie script got a bigger place. And that's Robert Moeller's integrity acumen is a great variety has now been tested and found to be wanting who is a person of absolutely no moral character. He didn't run that investigation.

J you and I know it was Ron bile his subordinates.

We met with him many times hardly knew what he was talking about half the time had to be corrected on several occasions by his subordinates and rod residents. I'm not going to absolve him from any responsibility.

He appointed him.

He gave them the scoping memo he told them to target like they took an innocent man, and they decided Obama doesn't want him were gonna kill him. And that's exactly what they did business. General plans the life we now know from the transcripts quoted. This is quoting from again. The transcript present Obama new details of Mike Flynn's 2016 wiretapped phone calls he was told about this by Jim Comey so he knew about this he was leaving office. I mean literally days and days and yet he knew there was this takedown effort of the Trump team that was coming in because again it was all about policy disputes and using the the what law enforcement tools intelligence tools to takedown and hamper an incoming administration because a policy disputes because they were upset the present Trump beat them in the election beat the Democrats election. Something thinking about this, so get your you know and not operating at their very modified circumstances obviously so the house and Senate.

But ship comes up with a statement he still quoting Robert Moeller which enter a proposition.

Robert Moeller did not say that me just you know is lying on leaks always estimate his own transit. I think about what's coming ahead with the intelligence committee or the judiciary under Sen. Graham. What you expect happening there.

What about the Senate Intel committee and they made that report. Remember there was all this serious concern hear the witnesses what were they talking about like that. That's a really yeah I was gonna say a Republican led Senate intelligence committee.

I think fell down on the job on this one because they would've had access to these transcript I fully agree with you but jamming in Adam Schiff's world right now in the House Judiciary Committee. The Senate Judiciary Committee looking at this if you rollback the tape. This is what I call the Adam Schiff strategy.

He's sitting through these deputy physicians were Andy McCabe says he can't prove the accuracy of the dossier James Klapper says he never saw directive evidence Evelyn Farkas that she didn't know anything Loretta Lynn says she doesn't recall anything special counsel.

It came out didn't find anything J during the entire time from 2017 until today.

What has been one of the most often repeated lines by chairmanship in front of the cameras. He has very frequently. Jordan play one of them a minute ago. He is very frequently set-breaking news for you.

I have in my possession, direct evidence of conflict collusion or a crime. I can't share it when I can handle wait until the transcripts come out and guess what whistleblower here for the whistleblower that is is Adam Schiff at his worst, I immediately said this is anything unchecked again by 37 direct evidence of collusion. I want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and and is very much worthy of investigation right before adhesive. Klapper by the document Klapper Jim Klapper under oath to committee intelligently said I never saw any direct empirical evidence. The Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the Russians to met with the election case of so they were all under oath.

He said a lot of things that were different than when they were in cable news broadcast.

You let me just tell you something is the person that is one of the people. Several of us on the progress they live through this for three years. What a fraud on the American people.

What a fraud on the American ship with all of these you know, pompous, and you know I have direct evidence of a century now it's the now. It's because we got a real Atty. Gen. and outstanding work as a cancellation etiquette. You can't sneak FBI agents in the offices that are not supposed to do that whenever they mean by this.

He said there were now like a new delicately played by people real quick like a new democracy. It's like we've been reborn as a country that's a good thing were flushing out the swamp.

Schiff lost 50 years worth of ground in solidifying the justice department after Watergate of this really puts us back in the category of almost an emerging democracy with the rule of law is not yet firmly established where prosecutorial decisions are made on the basis of politics.

No, we gain 50 years. We leapt forward 50 years from a Department of Justice that was disgusting. Department of Justice full of political rats and bureaucrats and by the way, I hope you bureaucrats at DOJ don't listen Jim Comey. We don't want you to stay. We don't need you there quit just like that prosecuted in the flame case walk away swamp rats walk away or else you're going to be exposed. This Trump administration not being you know you notice there's a lot going on the world and get the DOJ's focus. No bars focused so are those prosecutors looking at what they were doing that Jay Sekulow live ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking.

If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow last 24 hours.

If you just joining us for second half hour that the Department of Justice has filed a motion dismissing all of its charges and requesting that the judge I close out the case on Michael Flynn because of all the new exculpatory evidence that we have now learned that the special counsel's office, including the prosecutor in the Flynn case who came to the special counsel's office was holding onto not divulging to the court or Michael Flynn's attorneys, let's talk about the part of what we learned. We also learned I present Obama no about what they were doing to Michael Flynn in the days he was about to leave office. We also know that the director of national intelligence, James Klapper, because all those transcripts of come out had no direct knowledge of any empirical evidence that the Trump campaign reasonable or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the Russians but even speak out about that during that whole fiasco of the Moeller report and Andy McCabe under oath testifying well.

As we try to explain before there's lot information still reporting not been able to prove accuracy of all the information. The question went on about any of it you know if any of its true or not know.

So I would ask Annie to sew the motions been filed by the government to withdraw the unit to dismiss.

Basically, what is the judge what's the what is the judge that still until the judge enters and it's not done right under rule 28 of the Federal rules of criminal the government can do nothing case on its own motion, with the consent of God before trial after trial began, got to have the defendants consent as well.

But God hasn't begun hundred K and Judge Sullivan is now in a position if he wants to do concur with the recommendation made by and the motion made by the Justice Department, a lengthy 20 page detail involve memorandum and dismissed the case and I have every confidence that he is going to do that is correct. The phones Robert and Marilyn on line 1 Robert takes her home on your on the air yet I not Jordan also drafted a before-and-after question.

It's obvious that when the Trump administration coming into office he definitely believe that the present expense policy.

She was going to dismantle the fundamental transformation of the United States of America, Pres. Obama elected President of first-term five days before the election date make that statement. We are now five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America and President from coming out. Also unravel the question on the official and FBI agents that were involved in the entrapment of Michael clinically beheld their actions doing a thorough investigation top to bottom. The celestial can include everybody there was long. If there was illegality. If a law was violated and the evidence establishes they will they will do that.

That's what that's committed to do and go to Harry quickly on this point, Harry. The fact is that we only know of very little bit of what's actually going on much more information in terms of the complete unraveling of the deep state. I think the caller is onto something.

One of the reasons why Pres. Obama preferred to see Lieut. Gen. Flynn fired if not prosecuted because he did not want to see this man playing the Obama doctrine which basically meant that the United States would remain on open door so that other foreign powers could push against us and get their way. And those powers included China included actors in the Middle East and, ultimately, it included a lawn and I think you just said Harry Bill Barr address.

Take a listen consequences for these individuals I were in the middle of looking at all of this John Durham's investigation and its attorney Jensen on ask him to do some more work on different items as well and I'm in a way to all the evidences and I get their recommendations as to what they found and how serious it is a little more work on some different items as well because a lot of focus initially with that was on like enter McCabe's firing was that what he did criminal now are looking at a new matter, which is this Michael Flynn, the origins of the rush investigation when it was even crossfire hurricanes crossfire razor and were those actions criminally. Now the department just saying they were wrong withdraw chart. They have withdrawn the charge against my Flynn challenges facing Americans for substantial time in our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontline protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member thinking not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.where you can learn more about our life-changing, member today ACLJ only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice defend the rights of life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called life will show you how you are personally publication includes all major ACLJ fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the Obama care means many ways your membership is empowering the right question mission in life today online/Jay Sekulow your phone calls 164, 31 timber going around with our analysts first Alice do that now that I want to go to Harry and because every heads up our policy so pure, the department just as policy director and all of this is unfolding. How would you analyze this and what would you put in place to fix it. Well, one thing that I would do. First and foremost, place in a positive obligation on all the and DOJ officials to tell, but I think if you look for instance at the plain matter part of the issue was that the field agent will be overruled by higher up individual reporting directly to the seventh floor. So at the end of the day. With respect to a particular investigation.

I think we have to leave it up to the field agents who are generally without the political biases that upper level FBI officials have, but the other point is you got to hold the other FBI officials like Peter Scott Andrew McKay accountable and so I think my message would be to all DOJ employees. All FBI employees at the end of the day you will be held accountable 164 3110 at 2000 684-3110 let's go to Lansing Texas online for Lance. Luckily Jay Sekulow live alliance just dropped Lance. Unfortunately, he just dropped us. Let's go to Tracy Texas online five hey Tracy, welcome to Jay Sekulow life and quick question shift have any personal responsibility or liability to any of this. Can Flynn go after him. Can the DOJ go after him.

I know I guess what they say on the floor is technically not privilege, but it's ability as a speech and debate privilege that they have on the floor of the of the house of the Senate and that's the way that works. I got I got a question. But when the man first.

So going after the congressman very difficult, possibly not. Although I'd exactly.

I think inside the house that there ought to be responsibility for how he handled the whistleblower how we pursued it, how it didn't disclose information about associations he had with people involved, including by the way, Mary McCord's testimony we have now, but ultimately J you're right and this comes down to the voters of his district are sent into the house that I would just make one larger point to have to be chairman of the committee anymore.

The majority in the house you ever speaker the house the arm into the chairman of that committee. As if that changes.

He will no longer have his position of authority, so any that question of the civil suit capabilities of Gen. Flynn for everything he's been through. That's real and 42 USC 1983 the federal civil rights double that. That makes it a civil plan gives a civil cause of action to anybody who civil rights have been violated by somebody under color of law. In other words, purporting to act in a legal fashion under the color of some statute constitutional treaty of the united states and if I was Sidney Powell, the attorney for Michael Flynn. I'd be looking very seriously at a 1983 action against people like strong and those who McKay call me EA and all those people who had an in setting up Gen. Flynn.

This is the same as what we have the transcript release only vanish if he tries to blame the last we know it was his fault into ladies is a liar.

No answer, so I try to broaden a bogus impeachment claim against the present partisan impeachment claim is thrown out by the Senate. I tries to still claim that the mother report is legitimate and shows collusion and conspiracy. Even though it says it doesn't. And there was no obstruction in the tri-state it was that too, but yet what a week in Washington when in the midst of coving 19 and everything else. The country is dealing with and economically were dealing with that shedding of light that we have no information on Peter Schacht.

We have no information on Lisa page Mike Flynn at the Department of Justice filing a motion to dismiss charges and throw out the case against Michael Flynn because of wrongdoing by the Department of Justice and and its subsidiary, the FBI, what a week in Washington DC for for them for America for justice and for present trumps administration Jordan, don't you think it feels a little bit more like a typical Friday in Washington DC.

The one we were used to wear all of the information came out once on for I would tell you a couple things that Jordan first of all, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan, also the acting director of national intelligence, rigor now.

They deserve an awful lot of credit for forcing chairmanships hand on this. We did a lot of work behind the scenes, as did others to put some of this information out in public with the political pressure on chairman shift. I got us to this moment. The other thing Jordan. I really don't think can be lost in all of this. We've got to have one standard of justice in the United States and think about these two officials, James Comey can brag to Congress about how he intentionally leaked a memo about a conversation with the President in order to take a cop as a political purpose while Sally Yates can go before Congress under penalty of perjury and and hedge and demure about whether or not to answer a question about this issue. Why because the President was in the room.

The only difference there. Jordan is who the President was in that case it was present Obama.

That's two standards of justice. I'm sitting here listening with and just said and what Harry did just that and I'm thinking to myself this I mean this is like that when I talk about what might happen in some other country or some other zone. I actually believe this. These were the top nasty prosecutors that were setting up people wires for a political agenda fix we live through this with an ultimate goal try to take down the duly elected President of the United States. Now they can't get it done so I got a deal next Tuesday with a local DA of New York at the Supreme Court and to committees of Congress. This is come to know it is that we got a good talking to from Jean online to this how the mainstream media wants to spin and Jean, welcome to Jay Sekulow live your on the air and on that lie beyond well. Gen. Jabbar was asked directly about actually this morning on CBS by Catherine Herz take a listen. I think his response answers your question Jean by 48 the last thing most Americans remember that he was resigned as fire, and that he admitted lying to the fact to me that is not well. People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes and the Department of Justice is not persuaded that this was material to any legitimate counterintelligence investigation.

So it was not a crime, so any of this or any whatever Mike Flynn said the times, the FBI was material to any actual investigation. He could've said whatever and so there was nothing for him to plead guilty to is what Bill Barsamian tried to get the government said during guilty pleas tell me what your evidence will show if this man went to trial of the woman went to trial and they would have to show materiality and with the Atty. Gen. just said is we can't show materiality connected with any counterintelligence investigation.

Therefore, the plea had no factual basis and was a nullity. So somebody to take your phone calls 300 684 31 two that's 100-6431 10 increase Nevada six comes back online for Chris, welcome to Jay Sekulow live hi there any chance President from would appoint Michael Flynn to another position. I am present trumps that he would be open to it. My question is does Michael Flynn want to go back in the government or first Andy and Harry, any dad you can all insist first he's gonna want to sue the federal government and the DOJ redress yet redressing agreements and redress of grievances were forms. I don't know that by me. I would think you may want to get interested again after that happens. Present trumpets reelected couple years from now. That is the main serve 30 years in the military I made to Lieut. Gen. The President certainly open to so again he makes the ultimate cause of that.

He said to be open to FEB Mike Flynn got a few things to handle if you will, before taking making decisions like that 164 3110 got another segment coming up a couple phone lines open and those you hanging on the line Lance Steve Jeffrey and get your calls we get back 1-800-684-3110 minute left. We got a lot information up@aclj.org really continue to update ACLJ.org I did to shorter videos, one on this new state stimulus idea that by the way, be a bailout for Planned Parenthood. If it's not done correctly. 16 states so you don't want that to occur is placing the pushback sink, cut wasteful spending and blue states. Why are we going to bail you out with more stimulus.

Taxpayer money to cut wasteful spinning like funding Planned Parenthood and other big government programs that are unnecessary time we try to battle a virus also did a video on this on Flynn. How about all this coming together this week so check those out.

Those about our social media today and over the weekend, but always check out ACLJ that order Twitter pages or Facebook pages for great information.

Keeping up speed. Of course, Supreme Court oral argument to the next week that about C-SPAN you can hear the live audio and will be right back taking your phone calls file segment 1-800-684-3110 only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice.

Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally publication includes all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, planned parenthood's role in the Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question mission in life today online/challenges facing Americans is a time when our freedoms are constitutional rights are under attack with the American Center for Law and Justice on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you. Not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ said it kind of feels like all times. Friday down spider Shiflett House intelligence committee of things they don't want you to know about the middle of Cova 19 especially James Klapper at the time. Back in 20 17 July 2017 saying, quote, under oath, I never saw any direct empirical evidence at the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the Russians metal of the lecture Andy McCabe saying don't know if anything distilled I say is true or not, that's correct. Set under a father getting Pfizer warrants using the steel dossier, but that can actually feels like old times and hasn't felt that way for a while with Cova. 19 the pandemic and the other issues we were addressing before the Senate. Nice to have money saved me and please, two or three day periods where the information that is been following is an unbelievable in this vindication. Now Michael Flynn as well.

I will get right to the phones review and order people but hold non-Jeff in New York on line 6 Jeff welcome to Jay Sekulow live two quick questions. Like all year ago and who should be the most concerned in Washington you guys said whoever signed by the application, the same question is like school in Washington should be the most concerned and is there any talk about doing some sort of like movie about all that make it more understandable. At some point in time to be documentaries and movies but were still living.

Impeachment was just a couple months ago and his identity to another Supreme Court case about the same Presidential harassment on Tuesday so it's not done yet Jeff for movie purposes, but certainly documentaries if they get the becoming and I get that it can be confusing for people. But here's how I think you put it together. One is with clarity. I go to Harry Hudson on this Harry with clarity what you say is people like Mike Flynn were politically persecuted by the US Department of Justice and FBI have now been vindicated. It's an easy way for people to understand charges if asked that the charges be dropped and that the case be dismissed will be correct and now I think the next up will will and plan perhaps brings a civil action in 1983, section 1983 action against the federal government and then number three third problem will be when Durham completes its investigation. And perhaps if the charges are filed so you know, I know James Comey. He likes to offer lectures and perhaps his next book should be entitled if Craig Gaudi said how hubris and arrogance wrecked an institution, but perhaps he'll relate to write that book after being told him the right to remain silent and that anything he says may be used against him. I like that answer. And I only said information for people is a whole lot of people just finally set call the need to be concerned. Right now I can list them all right now. I mean that's how many because of what were learning on a daily basis.

Let me go right back to the phones, though I great call. Good question Lance in Texas online freelance welcome to Jay Sekulow life takes hold non-real quick about our lower income government. I don't think I'll completely corrupt. He knows what they're doing and I don't fault a cop Binary.

My question, I would like to link the glamour that judiciary ready. Of course bring in general, but take a lot more than that to get to where what I like what the Republican Party is what you guys is that of the last years they have been almost complicit in the monochrome and everything that's happened while Gray present to their side. Talking probably more about Senate and the house and go to you on this because sitting next he wants to even do another rush report I heard. This is because at your burner, and Mark Warner.

They work so closely together in their committee and they don't have the same kind of partisanship, promise, but there still focusing on as well with with the Radcliffe is before them for his confirmation on the Odyssey did your night been very disappointed with the Senate intelligence committee and the Republican leadership. During this thing is that a lot of Republicans listen they can't. They went to bat when it came to impeachment, they threw right out.

But on this bigger issue.

They think they can't get over either on the Senate side the house side is been incredibly great and supportive present them yet. I think that's right Jordan, I mean II would tell you on the house side this report that what that these transcripts were were conducted under was a Republican led committee and I think now that that information is coming out shows that they did do a good job. A thorough job.

Of course that the control of that committee flipped the Democrats. That's where a lot of these problems have come in. I think that's when the Senate intelligence committee should've stepped in and and and revealed some reason for this information and probably pursue the investigation.

I think that's a fair criticism Frank in Florida it's good good question online for Frank to welcome the Jay Sekulow live here on the air.

My question is you have to pay no Flynn the government what date paid by the taxpayers, will it be paid by the perpetrators of the crime Andy on this and it is technically would come from the federal budget. The federal funds. Now we have likely Department of Justice has probably that money set aside for these kind of cases that happen. They don't not always as high profile, but it does happen where they are like you said their part of the criminal code and by the way, as taxpayers, even if Gen. Flynn gets what sounds like a large amount of money that even the millions and millions of dollars. That's it. That's a drop in the bucket with any kind of budget that were talking about paper rolls on any claim made under 1983, of the Civil Rights Act, title 4250 prevailed, then he is entitled to attorneys fees from the losing body and that would be the United States and those other individuals or soon so this is the other questions could be other individuals be economically viable as well. Personally, yes, I would look to them for contribution in making the general whole. If the United States had to pay. I would look to all those people who were participants and I would say they were jointly and severally liable, which is legally meeting you, and with some money to just look at the criminal issues. A lot of these officials could also be looking at civil damages, which again easier to prove cases. Don't take as long and cost a lot in the pocketbook final call the day Stephen George on line 5 Steve, welcome to Jay Sekulow life electric technical guys. Yeah, my question is, now that we know that this we know that it went all the way to the top what we know all of the head that different entities augmented the company make a case I may make you case for soft was it was it was attempt to take down a duly elected President. We said that because they didn't like his politics and they didn't like the people he was appointing it absolutely was.

I don't think there yet to even make any more case for that they tried to impeach him over something unrelated to Russia by the array phone call with a whistleblower who never testified whistleblower the sentencing to testify, but never testified they did this to Mike Flynn before they became in the office. The present came in office yet under oath.

We now know they all testified that they had no evidence.

Nothing concrete, nothing, nothing about steel dossier. There usually buys awards on Americans nothing concrete about Russia or even any evidence at all.

Other top officials say that every were briefed about Russia exclusion issue.

There was it attempted a soft. We fought back and fought back. We will talk you on Monday. Have a great weekend is on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member thinking you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ