DNI to Schiff: Release the Transcripts or I will

Jason, you know why the director of national intelligence to Adam Schiff release all 53 transcripts or I will talk about that more today on Jay Sekulow. Long live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow why do ship is one to release these transcripts might it show what was really going on behind closed doors during this investigation curated and and let's remember the background here. This goes back to the time when that committee was led by Devon Nunez is now the ranking member Schiff now the chairman when they were in the minority, was the ranking member. While that investigation was taking place. They shift main job was to spend for the FBI's been for the intelligence community spent for Christopher steel and try to subvert and suppress what the Republican the then Republican majority were trying to do so. This is just a continuation of that phone lines are open for your questions right now. Call 1-800-684-3110. He's in a position now which he wished he was in back then to simply block the stuff from coming forward and now your host Jordan secular Jay Sekulow like this Jordan secular was good to be back in the studio. I majority you as you want to face repair scope I could see his back it as well. This is big news because remember we been talking about the 53 transcripts.

These are people who didn't ultimately testify, but who provided depositions to the House intelligence committee of the Trump rush investigation and way back in September 26, 2018 committee voted you dated a sleep by parts of this, a Democratic controlled committee controlled by Adam Schiff to release the transcripts in the catch was at first it have to be checked for classified information by the intelligence community.

Well, they went to the intelligence community, and then Adam Schiff was holding Ted from the intelligence community, so he'd always had 43 to be declassified, 43, rorty declassified as of a few weeks ago. Now all 53. For that pressure. River White holding on the 10 and Devon Nunez brought that up. What were these to your holding onto all 53 have now been declassified so the acting director of national intelligence, Rick rebel sent a letter chairman Adam Schiff notifying that the transcripts of all 53 interviews over 6000 pages at all have been cleared for public release and he goes on to note that I urge you, this comes from the member writeup at the executive to the legislative branch, the legislative giving over to the executive. Here's why that was key from Rick without the executive branch to Adam Schiff, the legislative quote. I urge you to honor your previous public statements and your committee's unanimous vote on this matter to release all 53 cleared transcripts to members of Congress and the American public as soon as possible, but he added quote. I am also willing to release the transcripts directly from the office of the director of national intelligence as to ensure we comply with unanimous and bipartisan vote to release the transcripts that I update something I've been a big fan of Rick Nell's for a long long time and I will tell you something else. He has a obligation he has the right to engage this and I think that's exactly what he's been doing is making it clear so I think that we have to realize here is what's at stake and what supply and what supply is. Adam Schiff doesn't want to do what is his constitutional responsibility. That's what this really boils down to the boat to do it now. He doesn't want to. So now you can else is fine. I got them I got the authority I'll do it. Yeah, I mean Sadie said so far he's complied with the weird request.

Adam Schiff had not to share this with anyone at the White House.

Even though the White House oversees this executive branch and the director of national intelligence is complied for now so I think then he's got a timer for Adam Schiff. I don't know what Rick Nell's timer is but clearly there's a timer and these are going to be released was so great Jordan. We said to look for a statement from the canal.

He's essentially said you can't have it both ways. You want me to do my job. You don't want me to finish it. None.

And now I'm in a finish my job as you requested, and by the way, I'm an honor that unanimous vote of the committee and if you won't release it and then do your job. I'll continue to do my pretty great statement or live at 1-800-684-3110. Your calls on this filing. You see, the executive branch. I told you by Adam Schiff sending it over to the executive branch was giving the six effective control over the documents as well, as it was up to them to declassified simply because of this one 800 684 31 to what he think they show that Adam Schiff doesn't want to see that what hundred 64 3110 Supreme Court continued their or our family, that as well on Jay Sekulow live challenges facing Americans for substantial time and or value or freedom sort constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you Knott's well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice as is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called mission life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life casings were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the what Obama care means to the pro-life discover the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right question for economy mission life today online ACLJ/53 secret interviews were conducted by the House intelligence committee during its Trump rush investigation at the time these interviews it bipartisan vote unanimous vote of the House intelligence committee Republicans and Democrats voted to ultimately release these transcripts with their investigation was finished finished months ago people included in this or dollars from Junior who said I don't think that that Adam Schiff is protecting me about my notes for anything Steve Bannon but also Andy McCabe, Sally Yates again which is negative but you just name the primary culprits are what they're trying to get so look Adam Schiff when he was in the minority voted to release the information. He thought that would be fine. It would be appropriate. Now he's the leader of the committee. Anything you know what, even though now the DNI director of national intelligence has approved this for release. I'm not going to do it.

I am not going to go ahead and do it and to me, and maybe join in the second half hour by any, is processing your counsel, but also former US attorney and he and I and Jordan tried the case involving impeachment on the Senate floor. I just four months back and five months now. I think my mom was five months ago. As I five months of the month since that okay and the point is he could release them. He has the authority to release him. He's not going to release now Rick Cornell saying I've been a huge fan of Rick and outgoing else for a long time regressing on the director of national intelligence.

I've already said that these are declassified, I'm already ready released so maybe if you don't release him. American people deserve to know what's going on the release and yeah and this included angle to Democrats.

Here's my question. Anyone thinned what the Democrats then say oh no you the authority to release probably probably file some lawsuit or out of no matter what they under what vehicle they could have because he turned it over, you know, because there was unanimous vote to turn these over for declassification. What authority would they have to stop this from being shared by the agency that has declassified them as so and so far the agency is brought along with abscess request not to share with people like you that that I share people like me not let us see what's in these because why it may bolster the case for present Trump thought this point there is no more case right having the cases done. That was whole point is that this investigations over and pieces done. Let these be released. This included. By the way, the top of Bob intelligence people top Obama DOJ people top Obama FBI people all all the big names were interviewed in this audit on the Trump side, and that the Obama site so let me let me 63 people times… The thing so then, here is my question so Rick Cornell says he's generally sick right if they don't, basically, is what reading between the lines, but what is Adam Schiff can can it Rick Cornell someone release him. When they try to take some kind of congressional accident say no you don't. I think they probably sue Jake but you know what, I don't think I record. I was afraid of that lawsuit. Why, because he has to comply with the previous order from the committee, which was unanimous in bipartisan so you he's in a lose lose situation as far as which to comply with except for the fact that the official action of the committee took was directing them they release it.

So I think he would welcome that lawsuit. One other sub point here Jake the only person who hasn't had their rights fully adjudicated in this once again is the President of the United States because while I agree with the director of national intelligence that he could go ahead and release these and I think the White House is probably fine with this typical declassification process. The last stop for the documents is the White House so they can look at it for privilege matters. Jake once again the only Reos that are being fully adjudicated are the rights of the White House and the President in witnesses Jordan this is the office of special counsel special counsel's office not releasing the exculpatory Brady material. We haven't forgot about this in your space program in general.

Flynn this is Adam Schiff saying I'm not can release this information to quickly because if I do, guess what, there's a lot of exculpatory information contained in those exhibits write the Obama intelligence officials their thoughts on the dossier the truth about the dossier they were under oath seven is a member. These interviews were conducted by Republicans in charge so they were getting press now. Also what's interesting here is that Adam Schiff obviously doesn't believe that those Republicans including Trump family members like Don Junior and others very close to present Trump were interviewed that damaging SI damaging intent to present Trump unit listing all that immediately, but so what is this what is the truth you're it's easy to read between the lines. Adam Schiff's strengths still try to protect his own bad record.

There was no Trump Russia collusion or conspiracy, and unit. Notably, Bob Muller, you need to bring impeachment over Ukraine and now you don't release the transcript.

The American people. His embarrassing the Adam Schiff who even before covert, 19 was getting a lot of criticism for not even focusing on his own congressional district. The drug problem there. The homelessness crisis in this congressional district and he's gotta go through a jungle primary like like everyone and again I think that Adam Schiff is protecting Adam Schiff so Cheryl and Facebook as could any of this material. Just we just talk about Adam ship is holding be considered exculpatory Brady material like we are staying in the Flynn case. I think it is that kind of material. The difference is I want to be clear on this is in the courtroom, you're required to produce it in a congressional matter fan.

You not necessarily having to produce it. Although they all agreed and voted that they would. You're not required to, but they did direct the executive branch. Doing so, I think that the comply three quick things. Jordan want Jay, first of all exculpatory information we already know from the report probably for Mandy McCabe's testimony that Peter Strock and agent Penn Found Gen. Flynn to be truthful so that evidence is in there that's exculpatory to you think Samantha power, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes went there interviews about possible unmasking revealed and 3JI cannot wait for Andy to come on and talk about the salivating of interview. I'm sure that's one of the reasons he sold them back to II would bet on yeah I is issues with your Samantha power, Sally Yates bid Smith. These these are these the folks again who you don't get to see behind the curtain much and this would be the opportunity to see that behind the curtain up from a couple years ago but still I think it's it's important to point out the call jaded Virginia online to Jade Walker Jay Sekulow live.

You're on the air Jade transcript be gotten to the freedom of information act Discuss agreement information act is not applied to Congress correct, then well, we could get him in a through the director of national intelligence begin is the declassification process that would block it so that BMD candidate idea. Eventually that's right, you have to go through the DNR. You could get them from Schiff's committee. I rather given the chance release to get what's easier is that either. Adam Schiff does it, or yard, director of national intelligence doesn't record now does it and we get you that he be fighting about this for months because I suffices to put about one of the two. I think Rick Cornell is the type that if if he's giving Adam Schiff the chance to do the right thing. My only fear is that Adam Schiff get this letter if I was at a loss of some kind of injunction tries to find.

don't know what that looks like exactly, but the Lord knows I mean they have been coming up with law; with their General Counsel and let him week next Tuesday were arguing in the Supreme Court and that what were arguing to the Supreme Court over the phone so that the Supreme Court is to be perfectly clear, but were going to be making arguments in case is Doug letter was the lawyer General Counsel for the.

The house is making one of the arguments in the congressional subpoena cases.

But I would think they would try to come up with something the questions going to be here. Is there any chance that Adam ship does this on his own. He just as you know what I'm release this information, I restaurant up there and is not with them controlling the house I'd I don't know a less he had figured out what we figured out that which is that Rick Odell now has these in his rate made ready to hit the send button if you will. It would be a move of desperation. But look, I mean that that that circle is closing on him Jordan. I mean, I think the Republicans on the judiciary committee have now sent a letter asking for the information you got the director of national intelligence are planning to release them in Jordan we talked about a lawsuit. A second I mean II think it's just is right for our Republicans to file a lawsuit at this point and say that the director of national intelligence. If he doesn't release is in violation of the unanimous statute, so I think they're coming out one way or another will check will determine Schiff decide to try to try to beat the buzzer and put it out may be, although if I were betting on it, I'd still bet now right folks really take your phone calls on this 1-800-684-3110 coming up to the next segment. Little sisters of the poor case was before the US Supreme Court by phone today why the little sisters back at the screw hole. Why is it wise the abortion pill mandates and and contraceptive mandates wise is still up US Supreme Court and talk about that we come back especially when private businesses like Hobby lobby made case, but others then for-profit businesses that were closely held, were exempt. A wired little sister. Still there was in the states that that's of the vehicle as it states challenging the federal rules states versus the open the the administration did in the event this interesting play in the little sisters 164 3110 if you want to talk about that case as well talk about these house intelligence depositions that were done interviews that were done, the transcripts agree transcripts in total 53 individuals I'm at the top of the about of the fish. The top the truck ministration will have Jeff are the next segment to talk about the little support case as well. One 800 684 30 wanted to talk to us on air these unprecedented days.

We could hear the Supreme Court arguments by phone, live is never been done before, only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is intact and is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission life will show you how you are personally pro-life support publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists.

The ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the and what Obama care means to the pro-life in many ways your membership abuse, filtering is empowering the right to life question free copy of mission life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans for substantial time and or value freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades.

ACLJ on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms event remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God will where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ Jay Sekulow like this Jordan secularist of the Little sisters of the poor man again for her.

The unprecedented factor. You could hear the Supreme Court live in all the justices including Justice Ginsburg joining via phone from a hospital bed and she did. That is if you got it. I just yet. She's a fighter.

PS is it is kind of as a writer is a bizarre dictate dear and this is the case, it's bizarre to have back at the US Supreme Court in one of our legal experts in this matter on the life issue.

Jeff certainties senior counselor. The ACLJ is joining us now Jeff, I'm sure you listen to.

This is unprecedented yet opportunity one event to attend the Supreme Court today to give us the update on the oral argument you could just listen at home through whatever stay-at-home order or whatever phase water to your end and your home state but were eight you are able listen to the live audio of this challenge by states against the Little sisters of the poor and the federal government now in my office. Also the argument rather than fly up the daisies stand in the bar line and get into the courtroom so is fantastic that with a lively and lengthy argument and lasting over 3090 minutes. Much of the arguments for technical 10 turning on the meaning of specific words in the affordable care act, but there are several important issues that emerge from those arguments that I think are worth mentioning. The first being at the solicitor Gen. Noel Francisco and Paul Clement forcefully argued and ended with the echo and questioned by the chief and that Justice Alito if the Obama administration have the authority under Obama care to grant exemptions to churches from complying with the contraception mandate, which no one disputes, then why doesn't the trump administration have the authority to grant exemptions to other entities that operate according to religious principles such as the Little sisters of the poor that the attorney for the state of Pennsylvania, which along with other states is challenging the assumption here that had no real good answer to that question is just a score such that later in the in the argument that the affordable care act was pretty broad in granting authority and expansive authority that was his phrase to the administration in creating and crafting rules, exemptions and limitations serving to the affordable care just prior to this question which is basically why hasn't this just been worked out as my hasn't become a not and will come down. The issue lies in the accommodation been made at this point because this litigation.

Now this is phase 2 is it's almost 8 years later, right yeah volume that so what was your take of a briar Army Sutter Mayor Kagan Justice Ginsburg like she's a fighter doing that argument from her hospital bed that which is something you gotta give her that.

And what was your set take on the former liberal justices. I think that Monday I think were looking at 5/4 but you know Justice Breyer and Chief Justice Roberts to I think were sort of expressing the idea of why can't the parties work this out what the problem is that that's exact with the Supreme Court told the parties years ago in the decision. That's when the last time the Little sisters of the poor will before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court didn't decide the merits of the arguments in that case it sent the case back to the courts and said parties work this out well party work this out and the culmination of that of those negotiations were the moral religious exemptions that the trump administrative administration came up with in these regulations and that would put an end to this whole issue when everyone would've been just fine. But then the states of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, in and out of the Ninth Circuit Californian others.

They then challenged the administration rules here saying that these were illegally promulgated so this is why this lawsuit continues on because there's always someone who's going to be angry about the resolution of the matter, and I think is much as I said that everyone would want the parties to be able to resolve the stuff independently of the court deciding on the merits to be able to pump this case anymore. Have to decide Noel Francisco states great work was questioned by John Roberts regarding some of the applications of business at the sleep of the exemptions. Take a listen I like to begin with converting Abor issue which requires employers to provide whatever covered her provide support and support that I'd like to ask your question on your point. I wonder why sweetie to blindly get it designed to address the concerns about self certification and what the Little sisters call the hijacking of their plan, but the exemption reaches far beyond that. In other words, not everybody who seeks the protection from coverage. Those same objections. So I wonder if your reliance on is too broad. I don't think so, Your Honor for a couple of different reasons. The opening hombre operative language prohibiting the government from being burdened subject to a single extension and when you look at that exception what it is that the government may impose that burden think that combative fight. So the question Jeff.

The courses that they cannot satisfy strict scrutiny here with their burden supporting by strict scrutiny. That's exactly why the government has decided using riverfront as authority as well as language in the affordable care act to come up with these religious exemptions should be pretty clear that when the government imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of citizens, corporations, entities are so fourth defendant then also has the authority under the religious Freedom restoration act, federal statutes to alleviate those burdens that the government itself has imposed in the compound and the vision can be no compelling governmental interest here when churches are exempt when grandfathered plans are exempt, when Congress itself did not immediately and effectively immediately apply the contraception mandate to employers like it did with the age 26. Requirement of uncovering those people in health plant know that the the contraception mandate did not apply to grandfathered plans so there's no compelling governmental interest when the contraception mandate first was not in the affordable care act itself, but came up with, but was concocted by the administration agency and it was then applied across the board immediately to all employees there if they could have exemptions, secular exemptions and you have to provide religious exemptions as well. Just in case. Prediction is not for that's what I think that's what I think they step I found some really take you from crossing half-hour coming up. Remember also talking about this accident. Really, the director of national intelligence, telling Adam Schiff release the transcripts there ready to be released or else I will and we talked about this in our own separate ways. We'll talk about how much Adam Schiff start giving these over to the executive branch officials to do the declassification is required to do by the vote that the house and tells me to a bipartisan way to declassify this, that he needed to then send these over and that is what again is now we are hearing from direct – the state more than willing to release these to satisfy that congressional bipartisan vote with these transcripts out now that all such as 43.

Adam Schiff got the additional to that he was holding onto as well, that was weird to begin with it to the wooden send over declassify the finally did that.

Now all 53 transcripts are ready to go yet were not reading them yet. How soon will it be before Adam Schiff takes some action would be to try to stop for now. Take the action of releasing his doctors will talk about that with you 164 3110.

We come back Jay Sekulow live for decades. ACLJ is been on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member thinking. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow and secular so it the American people.

A lot of people got time to go to 53 transcripts that you know that is busy of a time for a lot of folks know they are working from home in between their zoo meetings. They have some time maybe check out what Sally Yates had to say or Vince Smith, Andy McCabe, basically the top intelligence officials and law enforcement officials. David said what's up Don Judy sent every it's interesting right 5353 people transcripts declassified and got the declassification process and the director of national intelligence that was told. Adam Schiff is been sitting on the staff of what they had two years. We don't like tie to your markers been sitting on these transfers.

Basically, the trump rush investigation was over with a special counsel's report yet infinity finish in April and then the vote to release them was September 26, 2018.

So yeah it's been two years JR Jordan in about a year and 1/2 since the committee said that they were in releasees transcripts okay and now we do have the director of national intelligence before Adam Schiff had set off 53 right now he has the director of national intelligence. Just reset this Rick Canel Rd., Adam Schiff saying if you're not willing to release these quote. I am also willing to release the transcripts directly from the office of the director of national intelligence. Why your why would he do that as to ensure we comply at his office in the executive branch with unanimous a bipartisan vote to release the transcripts. I said that all along.

Once Adam Schiff started giving these over to its separate branch of government was asking in a sense his gable try to keep them off himself really could do, but there's something in those transcripts that he just does not want out, and the economy most senior counsel for the ACLJ's on this program regularly and Andy. There's something in those 53 transcripts and will get into the Sally Yates and some of the others in the next segment, but there's something in there eyes. I refer to is like Brady material in the Flynn matter that they don't want out exactly right. You know, if you don't want something that's quoted and used it on as long as he has. That means there's something in those transcript that will embarrass them that will make them look like the fool that he is there will maybe contradict the statements that he was making for days upon days in the Senate with respect to the President and the hoax impeachment process, but something is in there that he doesn't want out. I think Rick were now is the director of national intelligence should release those Devon unions as the ranking member should release them. I think the time is come for the public to see what's in those papers, so that might my theory is that there's information in there that is exculpatory to the President and probably takes Knox pretty serious holes into this Russian probe yet because I was taken with Don Junior's testimony in their if if he thought that would be damaging to the present is in the present sun you get out, especially right for election every month for election when Democrats have a tough time tracking me on what our team members ergo grandson Simeon said all the lines on the set the pulse.

These are the people bet who kind of score like a horse race. The election, no one got it at less than +7 trump radio and this is in the middle coven that he's able to gamble yet again. What and is the middle coven 19 I shaky economy right now. I am unsure about high unemployment, a question we come back. That's how bad Joe Biden is so there is bad info in here that would hurt… Trump like Donald Trump Junior's testimony hope Hicks testimony Steve Bannon's testimony would've Artie been out or certainly this would be out they were leaking pictures of hope Hicks arrived at got inroads.

This is got Susan Rice. This has Samantha Powers is the top intelligence and law enforcement Andy McCabe. I think the former director of national intelligence for the Obama administration maybe parties 53 of your time at top folks, there's got to be a real reason Adam shipped as a way to see this and his narrative is been beaten down so many times but this is it for the final nail the coffin is a just embarrassing to Adam Schiff. That's how it is sound.

That is what it sounds like it appears like and should try to have his way will talk met with you what you think 164 3110. Why are we getting these transcripts yet what is Adam Schiff. Freda gives a call 1-800-684-3110 will be right back on Jay Sekulow live challenges facing Americans for substantial time and are now free to insert constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member.

Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn mission will show you how you are personally publication includes all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists ramifications. 40 years later, when Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online ACLJ/list is in these 53 transcripts. There's a lot of trust people. You would think that might if any of this could even potentially hurt present trump leading up to print why why would and should the problem releasing this is why was he holding onto tendencies so it obviously wasn't because what Steve Bennett center Mike Caputo. The same Clovis people high up baby and said it was like Jim Klapper who was the former director of national intelligence.

You're doing the unmasking or been roads or Sally Yates you got you go through this list and you look through and you realize Andy McCabe, Loretta Lynch, probably not, because what Cory Lewandowski or Jared Kushner's even on this list see that a lot of people that potentially could hurt the present right because they're close to present behind her testimony was negative right which it honestly wasn't it. If that was negative.

This would've been out here in the excitement of what we know that you look at you look at the people are on this list with Sally Yates and and you compare that to.

Also, Andy McCabe, Loretta Lynch, you look at the effect of Forbidden Been Rd., Samantha power, John Podesta, the leadership of the Obama administration yet so Andy it's a bit just raises the point and that is you have the leadership of the Obama administration, former leaders of the Obama ministration doing all this and then ask yourself this question, which is the kind of what I think and that is why is it that Adam Schiff doesn't want to release the documents while ultimately and after all it's going to open it's going to embarrass the monarch Obama. That's what's going to happen here to show that he had knowledge that he had acquiescence in what was going on and that there protecting him that's ordered all leads to J and all roads lead to Obama whether it Sally eight the smartest woman in the world knows more than the office of legal counsel in the Supreme Court of the United States or whether it's McCabe and the insurance policy and whether it's gone from Junior all these roads lead to Obama, and that's who they're ultimately going to protect because that's his legacy. Thereafter insulating from any harm or any wrongdoing whatsoever. That's my take on this stage you see that this list to go through these top trump official people very close to present including his son and son-in-law is former top assistants and aides during his campaign, and after inside the White House, Adam. She's got control of releasing those transcripts and it very damaging they be out but I don't think you know he can't selectively do it.

That would look too bad so you don't have to let us see what Jim Klapper was talking about unmasking in Sally Yates and Samantha powered Susan Riley near the list goes on. Yet it was unflattering Jordan.

It would be out.

And that's really not hyperbole.

We saw that when various interviews were being done in the Ukraine probe they were released in selectively when they were unflattering to the President if the totality of this was unflattering it would have been put out weeks or months ago.

I agree with Andy and Anna honestly said as Jim Jordan and Mike Johnson who sent a letter to Christopher Ray believing asking specifically about communications to the White House, but ultimately Jordan what I'm confident is in this is information that shows that the FBI knew the general plan was being truthful. I think there's information in there about communications from Samantha power been roads and Susan Rice about unmasking and then ultimately Jordan, I think there's a lot of information about Sally Yates and the others as it pertains to the FISA applications. A chairman Schiff cannot have that come out as a regular phone is 164, 31, two, that's 100-684-3110 Dimitrios because Washington state online wanted to meet you. Welcome to Jay Sekulow live will you. I am praying for you and I know politics of Ukraine and Russia after learning he would Democrat you right now to current administration. I will accuse Mr. Pres. in initiation is exactly what they knew exactly what they involved in and on that point.

For example, cranking waking people go protest people understand the danger of the virus and everything, but at the same time.

People don't trust the local liberal government. No more because they seem the last three years has he tried to destroy transparency so this is the interesting aspect of the assembly good Andy on this is devoted when the committee was controlled by the Republicans. They voted in September was a 2018. They voted that once declassified they would release all of the transcript from the hearings, which is a lot of material and instead of doing that and eat the comeback with ship basically saying no and now Britt Cornell saying, well, I've got them one of them released all release them now. I think a weeks out you were on the beginning of this but I think that Adam should without some kind of lawsuit try to stop.

I would not be shocked if we did anyways, I wouldn't be shocked at all the regular not gone through 6000 pages they redacted on the pelican to develop a national he is a competent man he is. I think you still may be the ambassador to Germany today as well as open is holding the position of director of national intelligence is made. The trouble with any song sound like a good Andy at least hundred percent right.

Let's play.

I think John Solomon print report said this and I think this kinda sums it all up, puts it all in context by number 29. If you remember back in two months into the term presidency. Adam Schiff read into the record. The steel dossier. Big parts of it. The party read into the record in a congressional hearing are turned out to be now determined by the intelligence community to have been rushing this information or information passed Russian intelligence service so very thing that Adam Schiff is accusing the President of he did himself. He passed on Russian disinformation using the vehicle, Congress so I mean if that's what happened here fanning the question on everybody's asking. I'm sure your phone lines open at 800-684-3110 is what is going to happen. One of the Republicans in that house committee intelligence meet where they can do.

I think the acting director of national intelligence doesn't release it. I think they ultimately will J I think would be better coming from the DNI because the committee has already instructed him to do it but I think the committee would do it eventually. If that doesn't happen any back to the point she just made J meniscus today Ukraine call transcript into the record read by the chairman was a parody of the transcript, but never was the actual transcript put in by the committee, the President of the United States had a release that looks at some point the adults in the room, the ranking member of the acting director of national and it intelligence has to put the information out J, I really do think that's the in game here.

I tend to think so, to what he thinks yesterday. Ultimately, if if they could try and they're trying to block information for the American people that try to block this as long as possible. They want to block it up through the election, I believe so because I think there's more exculpatory information in their and if it's the President and hurts Democrats. It probably embarrasses Adam Schiff.

Remember, these interviews are being conducted primarily by Republicans and Democrats had a role to play those interviews and there are a lot of Republicans that were there were interviewed but it's it's obvious to me that we did names on their of Republicans that were interviewed, including the family members present trumps silent son-in-law's top aide is assisted by statist campaign managers campaigns top strategist. There's nothing from them. There's nothing from them. It's got to all be protecting Obama officials and I bet*a lot of pressure from people like Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, Samantha power exactly been roads finale not release well I transcript I just got a text message are from a very different mutual friend of ours is a very really good lawyer, excellent lawyer, former Department of Justice official. Here's what he said Jay what if one or more of the Obama officials weren't truthful Schiff can't pick and choose, so perhaps she's holding the mall. Perhaps it is been asked to hold them to protect the less than truthful Democrats that testified right there a lot of information to come out since 2018 about all the hijinks of gone down that Inspector General's report. Remember Andy McCabe's part in this and and he's Artie got in trouble for light, he got fired from the FBI for not for his when they say veracity not true. They didn't say lying lack of candor, lack of candor. He was fired lost his pension he's suing over that, but he was fired because the office of professional responsibility. There are recommended his firing was the acting director of the FBI, the time of his firing because he was lying or is lack of candor to the Inspector General's team in questions about his leaks to the media. So again I just want under stable comeback will take your calls on this. Take your comments on this but I think there's information here that again. I agree that there's probably individuals who are saying and that the did the left putting a lot of pressure. Adam Schiff don't release mine that are not releases of failure in charge now and it is also this idea.

Let's not let anything out. They could make the President look good or undermine our narratives against the President even though they've already been under my don't let any of it out for people voting in the November election will take your calls final segment, covered up, 1-800-684-3110 that's 1-800-684-3110. Take your comments of Facebook and periscope as well as 164 3110. I encourage you to go to ACLJ.org stay updated on all the work you're doing with the mixer for largess as follow our social media accounts by social media, twitter.com/Jordan secular about dad's ACLJ's and Facebook pages and ACLJ.or the latest information only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold mission will show you how you are personally Tatian includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, planned parenthood's role in the Obama care means to discover many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online/challenges facing Americans for substantial time and are now free to insert constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ Jay Sekulow Liber take your calls or comments get on Facebook, succumbing on this a lot of phone calls get to as well. What hundred 64, 31, 230-100-6431 10 Joe on Facebook is who controls redaction's Schiff or the director of national intelligence is not asking who controls the class part that's what was done by director – intelligence and executive rates got to determine that so that the executive branch determine who inherent redaction normally redaction's would be occult, cooperative, collaborative effort between the various agencies in Congress. But then this raises that I think of that mean diving Joe's questions fascinating.

Does this shift try to save me doesn't want to go. The lawsuit route does he say hey when I want to do here is I would I want to do redaction's probably that that's why I think ultimately he might try to beat the director of national intelligence to it in the director of national intelligence needs to tell us if Congress tries to make further redaction's then were required under the classification process. One other point on this. J.the documents can be unclassified are declassified and they can still be subject to a privilege from the White House and the White House isn't even invoking that privilege. So right. If the White House who has control has authority over some of these documents is waiving their rights. There is no way in the world that chairmanship should allow be allowed to make redaction's that the DNI says are necessary hundred percent tobacco funds. The outback supposedly goes to Christina Arizona online one Christine, welcome to Jay Sekulow live your there by the hope that I don't understand can hold onto the document. There's some way and I just heard you say something that the White House could do something when I'm riding on a stand that night event. There's some way like the Department of Justice or somebody even enough the lawyers like yourself could give them term because they have touched on the executive branch. You could probably do that for a request for request of classified documents at work declassified but not released it take you years years years so to go that because in the committee if they don't release it and answer still charge and get involved that requests a wide evening asking them. We haven't even be this whole debate that I do think there's an issue that Adam Schiff stepped into with this and he was forced into it because the committee voted to do this. Is it by turning these over to the executive branch in and the purpose of turning them over for the executive branch to do this work of declassified was to release them and did not releasing them does put the question which Rick Odell who is the acting director of national intelligence said could just release the because he would be following a vote bipartisan unanimous vote that hasn't been changed has been a different focus instead to release the snap without shift.

Try to take action. I was an asset is at the fan so your brother really good important point but could Adam Schiff call for a new vote to say in light of her ongoing investigations. We don't want the stuff released he could he could call for a new vote. It would not be unanimously get the members on his side.

He would get the Republicans and then put yourselves in this in this use of record. Now I mean even if you're just trying to protect yourself from a lawsuit which I think he's got higher motives than that, but even if that was your only motive. How could you define a unanimous vote from a couple of years ago, a directing you to do it so JI think he would still release them and then ultimately the committee would probably still it would set up a a a disagreement between the branches that I don't think the judicial branch would intervene in and then it would become a funding mechanism chairmanship would probably try to strip funding from Rick Grenell's office, but guess who won't go along with that the United States Senate.

That's how separation of powers in the tension between them is supposed to work. I think Rick Grenell's got very high ground to stand on here with a medical I back the photos we galas can and an organ on line 3 and welcome to Jay Sekulow live your on the air, water while writing for the next step that exits right selections. This party has a majority in the House of Representatives, and thus they vote on who will be the committee chief and Nancy Pelosi still turns. It feels like. I think that what is it feels like forever. And that's because I think the Democrats was hurting them. Still the most is the caller who used to live in Ukraine got yes it is way turning them even now with over 19 they drugged the country through a through just a war politically with these investigations. With that Adam Schiff was doing well. We were rock 'n' roll and they can economically we are doing well as a country are in the wars, beating terrorist killing defeating ISIS to Bad Baghdad in the economy is Rocky Road and their focus was on how to take data present during that time. Now we have a real problem with pandemic try to deal with as a country were try to come out of that is a country try to reopen as best we can in some places to get our economy back on track. Less of a Presidential election coming up and I think that there's been a feels it's been like it's been three 3 1/2 years, but it feels like even longer than for people, especially now with the scope 19 weeks if you like months it's it's been a very taxing time of the American people. I think they blame the Democrats for what I think it's me, but that you advantage shifts at the top the playlist yet you got that you add to that impeachment. Like you said you add to that three years of the Bob Muller nonsense and that's what I now call it the it is been three tumultuous years, but Nancy Pelosi is still the speaker the house then and that means she appoints the chairman yet we get this frustration a lot and you elections do have consequences. Here's what I would say to the caller that I mean II think you hear people say when you turn to beat Adam Schiff in California, it's hard to beat Nancy Pelosi in California and looked at may be true, although I don't know that I would give up on it other J as you well know, that's not where to control of the house is determine if you change the date the 32 districts that are controlled by Democrats that Pres. Trump one.

Nancy Pelosi is no longer speaker the house, Adam Schiff, while he might keep his seat. He's no longer chairman of the House intelligence committee elections have consequences in all 435 members of the United States house have to go back to their voters every two years were just a few months away from that and if the majority is no longer attained by the Democrats. Those two individuals know their their power will be dramatically diminished. J John on Facebook asked Kant, the President ordered them released so that's a good question.

Their congressional subpoenas and congressional documents that have been turned over to the DNI for classification review. Can the present and ordering related issues. Adam Schiff expressly said don't ship to the DNI don't share this with the White Housewith anyone affiliated with the present legal team. I'm not sure that holds weight I don't think legally they can do that with this and I may say · he works for the President. So I think he is the President technically they could or could potentially this is another legal battle and that's probably what the White House and and also Rick Odell's way is is is worth a legal battle do we put on Adam Schiff to try to prevent this, and have him explain why he's preventing this when you look at the list you think hate this could hurt Donald Trump's have to… His put people people that would be very close to him, but it's obviously not them because they have those waiver. Adam Schiff, there are I think it's writing is a combination of theirs.

It is exculpatory for their hurts and Schiff is one or two people very high profile people the Obama team Hellenization. I think we headed out yet. I think what Andy said when he was with us is right that the Julie Road .20 back to the Obama administration friendships comfort level.

I think Andy had a right on the and that I think is the primary impediment to this, but it's not over, I think you can be really I really did it. I think you get a scary 6000 pages 53 different interviews of most high profile individuals from both Trump and Obama administration on the Trump rush issue we do with how that laid out played out it wasn't so fresh for decades. ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side.

If you're already a member thinking.

If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ