Parents Labeled as Terrorists: Biden Admin to Blame

Breaking news today on SICU appearance labeled as terrorist by ministration blame anyone for anything.

Now this is what I hear from you. Call one 800-6841 one so you may hear the calls today by members of car secretary of education Sec. Cardona to resign following a letter that was obtained by FOIA. This is a new letter obtained by FOIA which means there's a black outside who got the email but somehow this was obtained through the FOIA process which means somewhat on the email exchange was a government employee had a government email account and in the email which was dated October 5. This is after the letter from the national school Board Association asking the Biden administration and the DOJ to use the patriot act so to treat parents as domestic terrorist because they were showing up at school board meetings and engaging and sometimes they use heated rhetoric. They were upset they were angry again.

I would be clear, the sprockets of people were making real threats and they were they were causing actual criminal conduct. That should've been handled.

There should be no question about that. Of course that's wrong should be handled. But question the issue is why the Department of Justice sought to then federalize law enforcement just figure out which exactly what they did in the tea party cases if we could bring federal charges against any of these parents under statutes like the patriot treating them like domestic terrorist, which also injured triggers surveillance of those parents potentially so there's this whole back and forth about who was responsible was at the national school Board Association or the by demonstration asking for will now an email has been obtained is between two board members national school board Association one who's upset about and and in the email exchange this board member Geraldo expresses concern about the letter saying I'm very concerned about the process by which the statement was made in the tone that essentially led the White House to direct the AG to consider members of our community pairs quote domestic terrorist that went on the neighbor's. Their response the secretary-treasurer of the national school Board Association said we were writing the letter to provide information to the White House from a request by the Biden education Sec. got Cortona now.

His response from the part of education very technical on the words.

While the secretary did not solicit the letter. That's by the white not with the national school Board Association, said the sinner asked for information they put into a letter, they were asked to respond, they put into electricity to solicit a letter from national school Board Association. They do engage regularly with those associations. Some you see there trying to say I didn't.

I did ask for the specific letter which means he didn't necessarily say with the patriot act in their these other other provisions, but maybe did, but certainly at least of the school board's perspective is Association the national Association. They went.

They did this at the behest of the Biden administration and Andy to treat parents like domestic terrorist to trigger laws like the patriot act to use his parents, which we saw in the follow-up memo. The first letter was in September. The follow-up memos from the DOJ first week of October saying to do just that. Let's see if we can prosecute them that way. That is an absolutely abhorrent thought and an abhorrent thing to do Jordan to do because a parent speaks in a rhetorical fashion, or becomes involved in a heated debate with respect to how their children are treated and how their children are handled in educational systems to convert them into domestic terrorist and to employ the resources of the Department of Justice and the patriot act to make parents domestic air is an abhorrent thing to do to criminalize the conduct of parents. I can't believe that we have stoop that low in our country want you to watch the broadcast to share with your friends and family. We come back to walk through the timeline for you. Also got an update on pro-life case and white will be joining us in the third segment broadcast to update us on that case just at scheduled oral argument, the Ninth Circuit Rick Grenell joining us. The second half hour. The broadcast discuss this route.

Voting rights push and also what's happening in Ukraine. She would miss it shared with your friends and family will be right back. The challenges facing Americans or substantial time and or value freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack is more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now. ACLJ has been on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress. In the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member.

Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us.

ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold edition life will show you how you are personally pro-life that supports the publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to the pro-life discover the many ways your membership abuse, filtering is empowering the right to request your free copy of mission in life today online ACLJ/Jay Sekulow to your phone calls as well on this. I really think the Biden administration now looks like they are responsible, direct for prodding this letter from the national school Board Association which they they tried to kind of rewrite and apologize for to encourage the Biden administration to start using laws like the patriot act to got to parents who were upset at school board meetings and express that that anger is shutdowns because there's been CRT issues are the covert issues I try to get back to school and all the virtual learning discussions of this curriculum issues there's all the covert issues by those two.

And they say now in an email exchange. It's been unearthed for by a 40 which means someone from the government was on that email that the Biden administration and the Secretary of Education Cortona specifically asked for this letter and asked him to write a report and part of education said he didn't solicit a letter from the national school Board Association. What that means though, is that they said they talked them all the time. You can easily set you let us know that St. write a specific letter.

This is what you need to put in it. This is like typical reminder of the Obama years.

It's very careful how they try to write that they were responsible even though the second sentence of their response. They say that they do have the communications with these groups all the time. So what I – you how you feel about the Biden administration. You trying to utilize these federal laws on terrorism to go after parents who actually take the time to be involved in their their their children's school board meetings at which by the way you told for many years.

ACLJ.

We preached how important school boards are we appeared before school boards multiple times and we continue to do so at the ACLJ because of the importance they are out to the communities at the most local level. Two. Start showing up.

Some of them are angry and now you're the ones retreat. Let's use the patriot act in the department of justice came and said, well, yeah, let's try to figure out how we can use our federal laws to potentially prosecute these parents are read from the letter will go to our team on this and take your calls at 100-684-3110.

I don't believe there's any excuse again if there was criminal wrongdoing should be handled that you don't need an apartment just as you don't need the patriot act to do that and if there were threats against local school board members a real, if the real issues. Use law enforcement, but that this about politicizing the issue and scaring you from showing up and make your voice heard about silencing the speech the legal speech, free speech. This letter for the nationals conversation was sent to Pres. Biden on September 29 and ended said the school boards Association requested quote such review, examine appropriate enforceable actions against these crimes and acts of violence under the gun free school zones act is a key part patriot act in regards to domestic terrorism goes on conspiracy against rights statute and Executive Order then others letter from October 4 from the AG to the apartment just as he has the criminal division counterterrorism division gets involved to announce a series of measures designed to address the rising criminal conduct toward school personnel and enlist. How can we can we do this under the federal do we have the authority, we bring a challenge. Can we we got these parents as a domestic terrorist. But now we have the link to all of that.

The link is at the national school Board Association when their members were there board member starts and why do we send this letter calling parents domestic terrorist was what was this in response back is this came through FOIA if it came through FOIA.

I was offended on this because then if it came to that FOIA process is our Washington DC office runs a lot of it would only work if there's a federal government official on that email that exchange which said we were asked to provide this by the Secretary of Education yet or had to be a federal official is subject to the requirements of full effort to be discoverable through FOIA so we know there certainly was the door now just a couple of things first. All this is such an example of the circular reasoning process that happens so frequently in Washington DC and you know we we know this at least originated in the Department of Education now at the secretary level. Jordan it it's almost unbelievable that it didn't originate at the White House. The White House very likely told the Department of Education the secretary to request this letter from the in SBA. Then of course they sent the letter back to the White House to the White House would have justification for taking some action and by the way Jordan, we don't have this link yet but I will almost guarantee you later on in the month when the NSB eight retracted this letter. Guess where that that request came from.

I'm almost sure that came from the White House to because the letter was starting to cause them political problems is just a circular reasoning that goes round and round and round and Jordan, I would say one more thing, the threat of terror in the world remains very, very real. What in the world is this administration doing diverting resources from combating that terror and taking the people that are responsible for being on the alert of terrorism and aiming them at the at the parents of our schoolchildren Jordan it it's a travesty for those parents.

It's also a travesty because it makes us less safe as a nation we see this politicized DOJ do this time and time again Harry we I member during the tea party cases. So this goes back to the by the Obama years with the Biden years to when Lois Lerner went to the FBI went to DOJ in the DOJ came back and basically said the same thing is her federal nexus to bring charges against these groups are the potential federal violations that can be investigated and charged and then see this came from the parents letter but is exactly the same. What's the motivation behind the criminal activity. Is there a way we can federally prosecute one of these parents or at least threaten the prosecution so the parents stop showing up. Actually voice their concerns, I think you're absolutely correct and it's important to keep history in mind the individuals who politicized the Department of Justice who politicized the IRS during the Obama administration.

They are still located in the bowels of the deep state so the Biden administration increasingly is terrorized by the sound of a windblown leaf and Atty. Gen. Garland.

He flees from reality, though no one pursues him so it makes sense that after the Secretary of Education organized this scheme to allow the federal government to label parents domestic terrorists that the DOJ would leap into action, and they have done so and it's also important to keep in mind that those parents should remain fired up because they are targets of the US government and increasingly, the US government is characterized by one thing and one thing only. That is a surveillance state that the right to apologize for but they haven't stopped.

This policy is really isolation that they've backed off. This is that we are wrong this the local level. This is to be done by the authors actual problems let local law enforcement handle it.

What's the problem there and in which Alyssa because the Secretary of Education was on CBS this morning, take a listen by 12 so question who I think is in detail solicit anything from that school Board Association and defendant DOJ and FBI have gotten involved in this at all. You know, we didn't ask for that letter. We didn't think the real focus should be how we authentically engage parents and I think moving forward we have to have a better strategy across the country to listen to parents and to make sure that they're engaged in the process of knowledge. Specifically, without letter, we had no way meeting request data where there was no involvement in it is that you get.

I mean, it's all about it's the letter EQ the keep on specifics of did you solicit a letter versus a report and of course that the same utensils letter doesn't mean you didn't solicit report or asked them to just call it order reach out to the White House first so that they can take some action don't have to initially say the Lord letter that we keep segment at any to me when you have the school board member when the of the national school Board Association members both going back and forth obviously with a government official.

There it's right now for action because he's try to come out and say no, they weren't. They weren't specifically asking for that specific letter while his game playing word games.

Jordan is blank the usual Washington DC word games. I didn't solicit the letter that insulins of the report. I didn't have board.

The reality is that you get the reality is that what you did as you asked these parents to put their neck in the news and to make them what ultimately merit Garland has said that they are, and whether he denies it or not domestic terrorists. This should terrified members of the public who have children in public schools.

You go to a public school board meeting you raise your voice a little bit. You become angry you shout, you make your point.

Just like we've done in the history of this nation with pamphlet hearing and so forth.

And suddenly because you are interested in the welfare of your child and how your child is educated, you become a domestic terrorist anger looks square within the though the gun of the federal Bureau of investigation looking at you on a federal level what you think that's going to do. It's going to chill you and scare you into keeping your mouth shut, which is what the Biden administration wants. This is an unprincipled and on parallel power grab again by the central government into our daily lives really take your calls this a 1-800-684-3110 and the next thing Russell getting it update us continue on this really an update from and why the senior counsel with the ACLJ Ninth Circuit is scheduled oral arguments in the pro-life case working on another one of his cases where they try to find the pro-life activist out of existence through him talk about that challenge. We are fighting on behalf of workers. Pro-life activist we come back on second only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold edition life will show you how you are personally pro-life battle supports and the publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the motion and what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership abuse, filtering is empowering the right to life question free copy of mission life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans for substantial time and are now free to store constitutional rights are under attack is more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ is on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms and then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ say hello back to the center part of education issue and labeling parents terrorist seems unfortunately before from the Biden team.

This is of course the Obama years when he was vice President tried to label conservative activist groups as somehow federal criminals try to use DOJ to go after tea party groups organized at the local level so it's it's a similar pattern of abuse is why we fight against the increase of the IRS size is not just because people you don't like the IRS because we see the wrongdoing by the iris. The targeting by the rest.

The fact that they still want to get the rule change so they can go and target again based off political beliefs and it cut a similar situation again hereto we are representing a pro-life activist who was part of that. Consider, for medical progress.

Remember the videos that were released showing Planned Parenthood in the solicitation and sale of fetal body parts in this big fine against the group with the videos and they're trying to go after one of the board members and and I we are peeling. That and Ed and white stories testing accounts with ACLJ at the Ninth Circuit is rescheduled. Oral arguments are to be making that oral argument, but I want you just tell people about the case here that they started in 2013 when the Center for medical progress began undercover investigation of Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers through the videos that they acquired you have Planned Parenthood people negotiating the sale of the fetal body parts admitting that they could modify their abortion procedure to get better specimens and then the famous comment from one of the Planned Parenthood people saying she wanted a Lamborghini that was her goal in the sale of a lawsuit was filed by Planned Parenthood as soon these videos were released. These videos made a splash across the country, if not the world the house and the Senate conducted an investigation made criminal referrals about what was going on with the sale of the fetal body parts of the states of Louisiana, Texas, a couple other states disqualified Planned Parenthood from the Medicaid program. One of these up fetal procurement companies in Los Angeles admitted to the transfer looks fetal body parts and to a close to $8 million client. The case proceeded we had a two month trial in 2019 in San Francisco during the trial. A lot of the testimony that I just discussed came out but the federal trial judge instructed the jury not to consider what Planned Parenthood done but only consider what the defendants did with regard to the undercover investigation after that trial, the jury ruled against the defendants, including our client issued damages of $2 million and then the trial judge later issued an order for $13 million in attorneys fees and costs are a total of roughly $15 million. We took an appeal that cases be pending now for a couple years things take while in the law and these Ninth Circuit just issued an order yesterday saying that oral argument will be held in April and I will give us an opportunity to advance our arguments, but mainly to answer any questions from the three-judge panel. If we do not prevail.

There are other options would be to ask for the what's called en banc the full-court of the Ninth Circuit to consider our cases and of course to go to United States Supreme Court. As you point out, it's the $8 million fine for the for what they're doing but they're able to go to court and say don't worry about their illegal activity is these bad guys got the videos that uncovered this activity, which led to all of these investigations and potentially lead to policy changes even at Planned Parenthood because the fines they had to pay Nick investigations that went on to say, look, the delegate that don't consider that, though, consider that their performing abortions so that they can preserve these or after fetal body parts to then sell to this market. Only you know let's punish the, the, the, the pro-life activists here in $15 million fines so that the key is is the key to our challenge of this again. It's in federal court that this violates the constitutional rights of our client. That is one of the claims also that the abortion industry is trying to use the Ricoh law. That law designed originally to fight organized crime against pro-lifers but one from your previous segment about the Biden administration going after parents and on the IRS, the tea party. This also is in the same vein of trying to silence the pro-life movement. So if you can get an eight favorable jurisdiction. San Francisco an extreme damage award attorney fee award you Planned Parenthood could stop other investigations happening against you because people do not want have to pay $15 million. That's where the ACLJ comes in. And thanks to the donations of our members were able to going to court and fight tooth and nail against the largest law firms in San Francisco were going on six years now after two month pot two month trial. It's because we were able to do this that we are able to hopefully prevail at the end of the pro-lifers will have the courage to go forth and expose the evils of abortion, and I appreciate the update real estate on this new postop and ACLJ.work on the case of the oral argument be the spring but I appreciate something all ties together today.

That was the plan. It was this all ties together this idea, silence, parents scare them away Riccardi Terrace see what we did to those pro-life activists there to be fined out of the air. Being able to ever you don't have resources again to ruin their financial life.

Don't get associate with the pro-life activist we don't don't use that pro-life speech noted on the board. One of those groups and the safety with the tea party. How do we make sure they don't get off your they don't get IRS approval before the midterm election since we need to go after them using the federal laws laws to go after organized crime the same way they go after. Again, pro-life protesters would take over the phone calls coming in. Ron and South Carolina online three hayride welcome secular ground, the air yeah thanks for taking my call. Literally, you have just about picking words out of my mouth because the way that the Biden administration has enacted the Department of Justice to go after the parents were only exercising their freedom of speech. The same thing happen. I believe that but with either the Clinton or Obama administration where the RICO act was used against pro-lifers who were demonstrating to save the life of unborn babies because in these winter cases. US Supreme Court decision case and this is the Clinton years there some fall over and said other ministrations, but started on the Clinton years of trying to utilize Ricoh to go after pro-life activist yeah Gordon, that's exactly right. And those were the then the bad years for antiabortion protesters. Pro-life advocates because what the federal government did in again at Democratic power grab a power reach was to take the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act, the did not design to go after organized crime Mafia type conduct that kind of conduct and to twist and contort that law and to criminalize people and call them Ricoh violators who simply express their views on from freedom of right to life and things of that nature which were never intended to be federal criminal acts under the racketeering statute.

Folks, we are if we find on all these fronts. As you know we've been tying up this issue with parents. I will continue to find on that is restated, uncovered information about how involved the pine ministration was five rights. These tea party groups organizing arthritis life organizations you heard were still fighting for life activist to be able to engage that the fear that you going to get San Francisco Ct. and you can find out of existence. That's the idea how to find you out of existence. I think those videos were a lot of the reason were wait. Waiting at Supreme Court case in Mississippi.

We write back. Second affair for decades. ACLJ's been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ keeping you informed anything. Now Jordan secular. The second broadcast recruit males rejoice annexing retirement rights push by the Democrats how partisan this is gotten how the absurd labeling opponents of the federal lysing of our elections as downright racist. This would present by wood to a planet debris retirement that would recruit now annexing the broadcast also get up and was happy with Ukraine and Russia business tensions continue there and how that affects of the United States, but I did want to make sure we keep you updated on the. The vaccine mandate case as the US Supreme Court that were it's it's not any's not with certainty.

I can't say were getting an opinion tomorrow but as Scotus blog reporters on the Supreme Court's calendar. There is at least one opinion from the Supreme Court that will be released tomorrow.

I think that it's potentially going to be that case, the reason I would send them could be next week. It could be later, but is because, again, it would still fall that time and were that good faith section of the implementation for businesses part right now but were not yet into the part with the financial major financial penalties. That's not of February so it would still be timely and again I'll put up on the screen. If we if we want to set a Guinness record release one or more opinions tomorrow so this Thursday so really found that very close as you know, we represent the heritage foundation.

I'm sure people wanted to come to know where that still because of a lot of people thought there might be Xmas report quit were quickly released on estate that did not happen, but I get to watch a very closely. We will know that before we were up before we are on air tomorrow whether that is the opinion that the Supreme Court is asking for the lease is a opinion coming out and maybe more tomorrow.

So watch that. It doesn't mean a guarantee order watching very carefully. Second, were on the side apart adjusts issue with with the parents and now the match is linking back to the bind administration. It looks like it started with the bind administration to the point where US Sen. Rick Scott from Florida is calling for the education Sec. to resign because at the national school Board Association and uncover email between the board members and some government official because that's how it came out to FOIA said that they were asked to provide this letter to the bind ministration by that the secretary know he is quick is very formal response back is weed and asked for that letter that does not mean we didn't say contact the White House first start there. Let them know your concerns. You have to say put into letter put into this mean you have say put in the patriot act but they could have said that to me that's a part of their denial doesn't cover that part is they'll say we talked these groups all the time so I give her to follow that up. Watch it through that timeline. I will go to David's contents of any's been holding a line to a David Logan Sekulow on the air. I think you might question it to court on earth part is all well the little who hold people accountable to all the court cases that are you winning your finger. For example, you mentioned previously, I think it's important – and how the learner verdict, the irises turn right around and to get and you know it first domestic terrorist is to who you don't know when the government is some evidence on the learner issue able to do it again yet because our court order and want a change in federal law and that was in the back that to change the federal law to remove the learner rule which says you cannot as the RSA bill that a list of conservative groups and target dose because they're conservative or pro-life groups because there pro-life sets with happiness after the IRS is able to do that now. Now that we got.

We caught them once doing that again another legal group friend of ours and they were found to be in the wrong so they were held to account what they were doing was wrong and illegal. They want the law changed now on this front is no indication department just naturally while everybody's trying to say that sent language and when I try to really use this domestic terrorist is they haven't said that this is really a local policing matter. If there's individual case of a parent taking it too far when they need to be followed up by Whitelaw force or making threats.

That's no place for that, but again that what they did like was vibrant speech which can include angry speech that is in your domestic terrorist were to stay on top.

See how involved Bynum's challenges facing Americans or substantial time and are now freedoms our constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the frontline protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms, and that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold edition life will show you how you are personally pro-life and publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right to question your free copy of mission in life today online ACLJ/tech issue there. We get that fixed out. I wanted to get back to another issue where again we see this rhetoric. This device so you call parents who want to show up and score me for God to show it up. By the way, I think those parents because we been preaching for years at the ACLJ price. The founding I was a kid and I would sometimes go with my dad and he fly in and she he would actually go before school board meeting and because of something they were doing it was wrong. Filing the constitutional rights of students.

A lot has because of students personal religious beliefs are at in these issues that would arise and you have to fight back with the school board never would imagine because he fought back with the school board you get label somehow to terrorist because he might be angry. Sometimes I buy those progressive guy she was defending your client is going for any kind of government body to do so. That's exactly what we saw here with the now it looks like the bind administration encouraged the national school Board Association to write that letter asking the bind administration and the DOJ start invoking laws like the patriot against parents and so we've got one of those issues that we have a new issue and we were talking about, which is this attempt to federalize elections and these voting rights legislation, which by the way, has no textile really talk about this. I want you understand Job I'm selling you to choose him or your racist and some of the worst racist goes through names throughout history and if bad actors but yet what are you supposed to support will just take my word for because there is no actual legislative text review what is a response to its response to Republicans taking back state legislatures focusing on that investing in that. And then when the census came around, get to look at redistricting course you do that because sometimes gain congressional seats and loose Christie that's federal so you get instructed then by to what to do when you got a redistricting and they all started looking at the last election cycle with a sentence we don't want this happen were people don't trust elections, win or lose their candidate when it was really something to feel like elections, secure, safe, and no need to complain about them so they went in and he started fixing the laws state to state differently in each state because they're all different in different size populations are different concerns they don't like this at the Democrats want to listen to Pres. Biden refers to Rick Trammell out right away or she buys from asking for possible risk resolve these issues as well. This is how he's trying to catch goes to Atlanta Georgia. My hometown and makes the speech.

How do you want to be remembered for consequential moments in history. They present a choice you want to meet us on the side of Dr. K or George Wallace do on the side of John Lewis bull Connor decided Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis. This is the moment to decide to defend our election to defend our democracy legal recruitment Rick this again to Parton to make this issue not just partisan majority was there's no legislative text so I can even review it. Point out. I know the problems it would be there. This federal takeover, but excitement specific yet and then second to tell you. Tell the American people that those of us who don't support this federal takeover are equivalent to bull Connor out of Alabama or George Wallace, there were these were these lifelong racist traction. The lowest point that Joe Biden had had an he is desperate to change the the issue he wants to change the subject because presidency is literally floundering you look at everything will issue immigration, the price of gas border Afghanistan Russia China every single issue he completely failing and is now a puppet of the progressive who just want to say if you don't want to federalize collection to make sure that people get to vote without an ID without an identification. You don't purport that. And somehow you're right that look I I am a minority. I am gay I am somebody who is extremely conservative and I talked to a whole bunch of minorities every single day in my life. I don't know a single person who feels like and identify an ID if some sort of race that move or an IDE is something that cannot prohibit them from voting. Minorities are not stupid people. I have ID you know I think that the conservatives and the Republican got to get much more aggressive about that. If you are not for an ID that means you're trying to cheat ID they're pretty basic. You have to have them to get that Walmart you have to have them to get on a plane, and so why are we even allowing Joe Biden from Democrat to pretend like we are ready for if we want to require identification about and not send out ballots into the mail. The people that don't bother coming and didn't request about it may not be there to get it. We all got these moves and lasts since the last census multiple times I have got at least one to live ballots in places I didn't live anymore, and this was done of the respondent covert and now there also some states that had real ID requirements coming in that wave.

Those because of covert.

So I think they showed it at at some of those were what some of these requests will most likely massive mail out of ballots and put because of it was tough to get a new ID because the reason they did the right, right. They didn't need the federal government coming in and telling them what to do on the ID party, said the stock that we can implement it. Yet have to wait to the next election cycle. But what she got new piece up at ACLJ that work on it's it's called a government takeover of your right to vote. What you need to know me. I listen to the present speech yesterday and it was grandiose nonsense was insulting.

A native of Georgia. Fred George's law and elections apparently depressed and has not read it.

But here's the thing that disturbed me so much about what he saying you know he did all these drastic comparisons. John Lewis bull Connor Abraham Lincoln Jefferson Davis, you cannot just disagree with Joe Biden, principal on the merits of legislation. If you do you are evil, algae… You said he was science.

Apparently, Pres. Biden thinks he is truth and honor and if you disagree with him.

You are both dishonest and dishonorable. This kind of exaggeration. Hyperbole is both disingenuous and is not helpful if you dislike propose legislation to force the states to mail ballots to everyone and you have to count them, seven days after the election, even if they have no postmark somehow you're like Jefferson Davis your racist and your evil, I mean II don't he should fire the speechwriter who wrote the speech form.

But what really disturbs me. Rick is I think the President actually believes this I can imagine that someone actually believe that you have to be a mental patient and not to believe that somehow the great idea.

I honestly don't know a single person doesn't have ID and I would even move. To pay someone can't afford an ID that made the state or the local government can get them on for free but these laws have all these laws have not visited for some reason you don't drive your disk just go get his estate ID for free… Talk about what this really means to. If you have ever lived in an apartment complex or know anyone who lived in an apartment complex.

You know that the transitory nature of that building means that on election day. Then the ballot for people who are on the photoelectric don't know that the ballots are coming.

There can be a plethora ballots in the mail room and going to homes where where where people once lived and no longer live if the recipe for disaster, to send ballots in the mail to people who don't know they're coming. And so I don't think it's too much to say. Look at wheat we can have extended voting. We can even do mail and doubting that you have to request the ballot and tell us where you live so that we don't recklessly put ballot out there for people to mishandle it almost like a Democrat want the election to be floppy and no voter ID because they want to cheat and this is my problem is that the Republican got a get much more aggressive about that you're trying to cheat you beyond sadness. He finally got about 30 seconds here, but it's also it's the idea that this kind of sloppy election, which then they lose. We saw this Georgia and Georgia at the state level in the last group tutorial race if they lose though claim it was a fraudulent, illegal election door that likely thing that the Abrams remember to her said that he lost the last election right. She thinks she is running for reelection this is this in this. This is very real functions happening in real time with the idea the demonization receives students, their parents are terrorist. You are racist. If you don't support allowing the text so I meet. We don't eat we can analyze what he's talking about yet.

He's comparing all of you listen who might be opposed to this to George Wallace light to the head of the Confederacy seat assembly of the symbolism they're using is very extreme and divisive to our country's not good for free and fair elections.

Trust only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold edition like it will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question free copy of mission in life today online/challenges facing Americans as time and are now free to store constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress to get in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms, and that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ as if I'd like to this work also. They also will use this voting issue like the life issue to justify their tips to potential court pack if they had both they don't have the votes do that right now, but if they did you hear that around these kind of cases like if the Mississippi case goes in our favor in the way of life and protecting life. Start time about your packing the court.

They did this with the voting rights to they said that the states in the South gone through this preclearance after redistricting after the new synthesis command that most of the states are states again and again in population and the Sun Belt had a region but sufficient southeast. They continue to and so they redistrict after senses because they might have new congressional seats and against some states loose seats, a battery reconditioned they got a go back to redistricting estimates do that well to the state legislature and so it's up to the political parties say they want invest in those state races house district by State House District state delegate district by district to do so, but then when you get to this point where you want to use the FBI and the partner just about to parents. You try to use the IRS to after conservative groups and now you're going to say that people who support vote more voter integrity so that we don't have a repeat of the last election cycle, so that also have a repeat of Stacy Abrams say that that election was everybody should know what the rules of the game are in their state. It should be state specific, because states are so different but the idea stand in Washington now the other side of the aisle on this issue are equivalent to racist how they think that they're going to be able to function as a government was pretty ironic to Jordan that that argument was made in the state of Georgia based on the Georgia law that, by any objective standard Jordan increased access to voting with your talking about hours or access to ballot her registration requirements. It increased access to voting now did it tighten security over voting yes it did. That means that the Democrat party that is opposing this including Pres. Biden. By the way, that's actually what they're objecting to Jordan there objecting to the increased security of voting, not to a restriction on access to voting because the Georgia lot absolutely does not do that adjourn. I would add one other point to your your description of the John Lewis voting rights act, which is that redistricting a piece there also using that Jordan as cover for the other bills that they want to get through the for the people act which most people know is HR one or S1, or now this. The freedom to vote act, which West described those are the ones that have their biggest wish list items in an Jordan to let me just say this, all of them are really the same thing. It's a federal lysing of elections and why do they want to federalize it because Jordan it's much much easier to control the outcome of the election. If you can federalize it if the control remains close to the people. That's what you can get your getting get more of the people elected to the people actually voted for it… The Secretary of Education by an administration secretary Cardona so he says united and asked that specific letter you that's legally as we all know that we talked about that. Then he got asked the following question by CBS which is, regardless of that answer. Do you support the DOJ and FBI being involved. His responses is his telling enough right there by 13 you agree with the DOJ and FBI involvement in on any threats toward any elected official is unacceptable and whatever steps need to be taken to make sure that doesn't happen should be, because I know, especially across the country are board members oftentimes are volunteers that want to help the community and they should be protected and the extent the state and local officials.

If there's a problem with their safety, which there are times in the pattern we see that, I would state government officials and local government officials they had. That's why we have police at the local level to take care of them. It week. He is not backing away from the DOJ and the FBI trying to go after parents this way and the idea that if you raise your voice at the meeting, you'll be labeled a terrorist, trying to silence free speech that's right you are. You are absolutely correct. But if there is a disturbance at a school board meeting and it gets raucous, and there's problems like that will board members raising their voices or parents raising their voices or something happens in a chair is thrown the planes to go to is your local police department that is the police power of the state you go to the local police department to restore order.

You don't label the parent who, because he or she is interested in his child educational opportunities and rides you don't label them a racketeer you don't label them a domestic terrorist. You don't sick the FBI on them. You don't put counterintelligence agents on them. This is nothing but a federal power grab and it anytime you see a federal power grab.

Whether it's in the schoolbook targeting a member of the public. A parent or whether you see it in trying to centralize elections anytime you see that you can see a Democrat behind you know we saw Garland a complete bar at the second Bhandari met with Atty. Gen. Garland for the house and have an answer question about this he said the White House spoke to me, but it would be project but it's the White House perfectly promptly concerned about violence. This idea again I go back to the voting issue. This issue, it's just dehumanizing to the to the furthest extent possible any of your political opponents. I think that is correct in this movement is actually led by the bureaucrats and the administrative staff who work at the DOJ who worked at the Department of education. Basically those individuals are committed to the centralization of power in to the hands of elected individuals and they basically believe that people who live in flyover country in Fairfax, Virginia, Loudoun, Virginia, Tennessee and Georgia should not have the right to decide who is in who was prosecuted by local prosecutors. They don't trust those individuals basically to enforce and eat an ideology and this is a progressive playbook that has been in play, at least since the 1930s probably going back to the 1920s when Pres. Woodrow Wilson agree instituted segregation in the civil service. So at the end of the day it's about the centralization of power and every single American should oppose that centralization effort vigorously. It website.

I look at it and people's act of dismissing with us.

Me as an activist and that's that. I thought we talked were talking a lot activist Renata broadcast.

Then there's the next group of people got woken up these issues.

That's who they're going after it set the committed activist who is willing to fight back. It is the average parent, mom or dad who has not been engaged before. They don't like the engagement they want. The sounds it's just like the tea party groups it like that was new and a threat to their power.

This is a threat to their power to selects sense of any works. We know it does work if they get away with. The government can be very, very intimidating and that the bureaucrats in the federal government. They do not like the people to have a voice. They do not trust state and local governments.

They do want centralize government control is disrespectful and you know if it is designed to intimidate and to be a power grab this what it folks. Whatever mind you truly know that there's at least a Supreme Court opinion coming tomorrow. We don't know if the vaccine mandate I case it could be the that will happen before on air. So if it is plentiful update for you ready to go in the analysis. There were heritage foundation. That case and you will will have time to review at least some of it. If that is that opinion and it says it least one is coming tomorrow. The court, I would today seal Jaden or check out Wes's new piece and whites piece up about the Ninth Circuit case the pro-life case there go there a lot of information of all the work were doing@aclj.org? Seal Jaden on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about her life-changing work, member today ACLJ