Biden Admin Admits They Won’t “Contain China”

Second behind administration admits it's not attempting to contain China, while the Chinese military expands its global reach into the Atlantic talk about that with interstate my pump live from Washington DC line when it comes to China. We been very clear that you know we are not trying to contain China for poor hold back, but we are determined to uphold the so-called rules-based international order that we've invested so much in over so many decades in the has been good for us and good for the world and I think even giving the phone lines are open for your questions right now called 100-684-3110. I think what we witnessed over the last several years is China acting more impressively at home and more aggressively abroad.

That is a fact. And now we are to go to 100-6810 on this Friday.

Second state restrictors that my company will be joining us in this first at her.

The broadcast of course your counsel with the ACLJ to talk about this conflicting message out of our current Secretary of State Tony Blake and who I will point out right. Very fair about his his statements as of it all negative for Boston. All units it's a partisan attack. It is looking at what is in the best interest of America.

I got the right to this idea would plated that begin the progress this idea that one were seeing on 60 minutes on Sunday, Sec. Blake and says yeah it's a more oppressive China at home and more aggressive abroad, then just yesterday we been clear that were not trying to constraint contain China.

This is why others news reports out about Chinese expansion of their military so operating a military base which they hope to be able to launch in Northwest Northwest Africa so into the Atlantic. They've already got one that's almost operable in a near the horn of Africa sets Northeast Africa they would operate in Northwest Africa to to then of course expand their reach militarily into the Atlantic, which I think should's should be alarm bells should be going off. This is again an expanding distance, not just an economic issue.

We tried anymore.

They are expanding their military capabilities abroad.

I will write to West with others who what when you look at where the US has basically been engaged in massive conflicts where we have bases all around the world to protect long-term interest. But I'm at work. Where is the Chinese interest in operating yell extensively in the Atlantic you will. China is not our friend. You know, and we have to deal with that. We have to look at the world as it is not as we wish it were. And so I think what's lacking right now is a coherent and consistent policy regarding China how are we going to do with it because militarily they are aggressive in Jordan here's the thing. A lot of people do not realize this China present day has the largest standing military in the world that we have better weapons, we have little more technology probably better trained troops, but right now, China has the largest standing military in the world. Their military budget is the largest in the world. They continue to expand their Navy. They have one aircraft carrier in operation. They have two more that are getting ready to come out for them to have a presence with their aircraft carriers and their submarines in the Atlantic that is never happened before and it should concern the United States and our allies, but they are aggressive.

They are looking to expand their reach globally, militarily, about anything, but in the same week a statement from our current Secretary of State.

Say yes technology, China's more aggressive overseas more repressive in their own country, which is true and then a couple days later saying, but what I do anything about it were not going to do anything about what I can contain China or even try to contain a Chinese expansion overseas possible, talk about all this and thought about you were about 46 Baystate Mike Pompeo as well. 164 3110 if you want to be on the broadcast this way hundred 684-3110.

How serious do you believe Chinese expansionism around the globe is United States a serious threat is that of your thoughts to what 100 684-3110. It's not getting enough attention. Chinese opium military base to expand the Atlantic challenges facing Americans is a time when our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now okay on the frontlines checking your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member.

Thank you thoughts well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable in voice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn gold is like it will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the Obama care me in many ways your membership is empowering the right question mission life today online/2nd we are tearful close to 164 31 Philip Secretary of State for suggested Mike Pompeo. Joy is next discussed this Chinese expansionism, but will write to Harry because Harry one of the issues that we looked at with this conflicting and there's all this to a lot of different ways. This is this is posing concerns the US but you probably are in your research a couple of points. There is a Biden center for diplomacy that people might not know about at the University of Pennsylvania Ivy League and the, the, the director of that former director that is now Secretary of State Tony Blake and her saying we don't want contain China but you found out who is funding that Biden Institute and it's pretty shocking.

The amount of course is behind absolutely. So one of the key questions that we should consider an audience should consider is whether Tony Boynton Secretary of State can explain why the University of Pennsylvania created a the Biden Penn Center and then took $22 million from China. While Mr. Bullington served as the managing director can Mr. Bullington or the University of Pennsylvania, which took over $67 million over a two-year period while Mr. Bullington was connected to the University of Pennsylvania.

Explain this particular connection. So one of the key issues that we should think about is yes. I think Wesley is absolutely correct that the United States military has an advantage vis-à-vis China but China has a huge advantage over the United States.

Why, because it has the will to deploy China's military might and because China is well connected to influential Americans in the Academy in for instance military defense contractors and so I think that puts us at a strategic disadvantage as China's ambitions continue to expand from Africa to South America and Europe and abroad.

If you look at that daily mail is a piece about the China's African take over time at the ports that they built it throughout. He could see the map she could see where they've got with providing power stations but also where there potentially putting bases for their own military silicate, Angola, Kenya, Tanzania at the Cecil's as well. I mean so and then of course I we talked about how they're already on the horn of Africa, and they're looking at something that's more Northwest Africa so that they are able to operate in the Atlantic more easily. Sadly, in the Indian Ocean their course in the Pacific, but did not asked to expand into the the Atlantic as well with you. We put this on top of the fact of what we see everything we talk at the money is being thrown around by the Chinese city of $67 million. The Biden diplomacy center that got no discussion whatsoever. It's not in the news not it's not added into this and yet, what do we expect from these leaders they are, they are making millions and millions of dollars. Former government officials of the United States with pedaling influence and they reenter the US government so they they got their own personal interest is not to upset their their main financiers.

When you add to that the Honeywell situation Jordan where no plans for war fighters were actually leaked and that company was was fine but then said you know what will continue to give you contracts will continue to give you more plans for future weapons are you in a leak. Those two that I should have never happened sure but I think you put it all together and it's not difficult to determine what you have here you have a regime of the Chinese regime that is dead set on being the next a superpower of the world, but you have limits on those in Washington DC who are willing to acknowledge it. One person that comes to mind. It has has warned about this repeatedly over the last several years, as Sen. Marco Rubio, but Jordan, the volume in Washington DC isn't nearly as high as it should be and I would tell you, especially this week. You played that soundbite from Sec. blinking where he says were not trying to contain China look when you look back at the Obama administration Jordan containment was exactly the goal that they would tell you they were after we were talking about the regimes that were our enemies are. Ron was the biggest one. At that point but Jordan, the left in Washington DC has walked away even from the idea that an avowed enemy someone who is trying to overtake the United States should be contained. That should set off alarm bells for everybody.

I just I think that you know it what's your also got a China that is looking at putting they will base inside it with the inside Iran meets on the house around there. Also, I think that that points to the fact that they think that Iran is stable enough to invest in as well well and they they share a common enemy and that is the United States yeah several weeks ago, China and Iran and great ceremony signed an agreement that they're getting ready to implement where they are going to share a lot of things, including they're going to do joint military exercises to share military intelligence and they're going to shut share military research and weapons development. That in itself is pretty alarming but is a part of that agreement.

Iran has given China permission to build a naval seaport on the coast in the Persian Gulf, not far from the straight of Hormuz were most of the world all supply travels and not far from the headquarters of the fifth fleet of the U.S. Navy and China is going to build a base there. What they're looking to do is to have these bases around the world and you'll often hear Chinese leaders.

They will therefore commercial purpose is there for fishing what they may be used for that. But there also for refuel and resupply of their Navy their Navy so that they have a global military reach. That is their intention, and I really do believe that weight with coded with the way the world has shut down. We Stokes did interact same related Ashley to travel and so it it could be taught.

This is when these countries seize upon these moments where were not paying attention where we are looking go domestically because of issues were dealing with.

Whether it's a pandemic in the economic consequences of that the all of the issues that we deal with it so you can quickly stop watching what's happening around the world will those world actors are not. But again, this idea that were knocking to do anything to me. Harry is very upset.

They just as an American.

The it it's it again and I don't think it was a trade out some war were talking about here with the idea that were not trying to step in and and I want to go to that statement because he's talked about the so-called that he called it that rules-based international order that we've invested so much in over 70 decades is been good for us to figure the UN and international law the international standards except for the fact that the Chinese Communist Party. They don't abide by any of those rules absolutely, and I think Secretary of State Bullington's response to Chinese aggression suggests that China has the capability to surgically remove the backbone from influential US officials. It's important to keep in mind Bullington's prior history at the Biden center at the Biden center heavily funded by the Chinese government and Chinese officials guess what the Biden center heavily criticized the response of Poland and Hungary with respect to their actions taken during the coronavirus pandemic. Guess what, they did not criticize China's response they did not criticize China's inaction or failure to fully disclose the source of coded 19 so I think at the end of the day. The scales are not balanced and so at the end of the day. People like Secretary of State Bullington. They are predisposed to give the Chinese government a pass just like the National basketball Association is prepared to give the Chinese government and the repression a pass.

And so again I think we have basically created a situation in which China realizes that under the Biden administration. They may have a wide open door for future aggression. Yet this is a again we we have not gotten to even ever get to this Secretariat for six state like Pompeo but the overtime at the expanding military and talked about the way that they they clawed back there.

There supposed to be white, white hat hackers. You know that would compete these international competitions and their winning.

I mean they were the best and they said wait, why are we going abroad to help.

Ask Western companies figure out where there there. The problems are in their third data in their databases when we can exploit those back at home, so let's do that at home so the Dixie band there white hat hackers who would compete these competitions to help make you know that the all of the data that we put online or secure. They banned them from going abroad because this is why we not, if we can break into this technology so that I get not abiding by the law not abiding by any international rule that United States international law.

He said it's it's so-called rules so-called rules are not are not going to stand in the way of an expanding China doesn't care what the rules are in the UN is not going to pose anything on China.

There are remember the Security Council so that nothing is going on there so they can break any of those international rules that they want without any consequences, and less the US and the Western world and other allies step up and opposes those consequences on China will have a secretary to buy from territories back only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold edition life will show you how you are personally and publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the abortion industry and what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right to life Western free copy of mission life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans for substantial time with our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack is more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms and then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ secular.

We are joined now by our senior counsel for global affairs. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo Edwards focusing on China. Of course, in this is dual statements from our current Secretary of State as Sec. of Lincoln on the cited he is acknowledging Chinese aggression at home at repression at home and aggressive actions abroad, but there were not going to try and contain China. I was the right said to Mike Pompeo secretary pump at this idea that we got a ace eight current Secretary of State representing the United States and telling the world today's after talk about how aggressive China is that there were not to do anything to stop the mall of America placed my comments are able to sleep the rest of the world, allowed the mistake we had for 40 years before present public office and began for the first time in modern times for President that the confront central challenge to us. The Chinese Communist Party. When people talk about well you know we don't want to go to work but no mistake about it, the Chinese Communist Party has declared war on the American worker stole our intellectual property. They stole millions of jobs in the United States. Good job, high-paying manufacturing jobs stole semiconductor industry by subsidizing Chinese state owned enterprises to two walk away from at the Biden decision to walk away from it think that I would go back to engagement and just talking along the Chinese comic card will change its stripes won't continue down the path towards global power and hegemony is an enormous mistake. It is an enormous threat to countries all cost of all the matters a lot for average Americans each and every day to play this only reacts to be that the this key line exists.

The interview just on MSNBC where we sick table. He can says record contained in this key part hereabouts so-called rules-based international display when it comes to China. We've been very clear that you know we're not trying to contain China or or hold it back, but we are determined to uphold the so-called rules-based international order that we've invested so much in over so many decades in the has been good for us and for the world and I think even giving the international norms a secretary pump. A national live.

Try to sits as a permanent member of the Security Council they can veto any kind of sanctions there.

If it is I think impossible to even make that statement without laughing that that the Chinese are following any kind of rules-based international order. When you start of the Internet. The the intellectual property stole of the US the jobs taken for the US, declaring basely war on the US economy from your position is as a Secretary of State did China follow any of the international norms never went over the WTO and massive violation, but it was a promise made to the people of Hong Kong, or one that still impacting us today. We think they violated the basic norms of how you operate a biosafety lab inside of who on and the result is now almost 3 million deaths across the world billions of dollars worth of economic structure because the Chinese commerce party came to have dominated the World Health Organization in a way that international regulatory body than the outcome of this is a country that violates every international norm. The world has permitted them to do that for decades and you, the only solution for the United States to lead a global coalition to confront them and to impose costs on them unless they change their ways unless they begin to comply is no sign that they intend to do that yet. That means our resolve needs to be all that much greater.

This Wesley Smith.I think they see us as a declining power and our periodic change of leadership politically as a weakness. Obviously, they do not have that unfortunately the Chinese people and so they want to take advantage of the change of administration and of what they perceive as weakness in the buy demonstration. I have a question because this is something that goes back to all of my lack this been an issue, and the US government is sort of been on both sides of the issue there and I know you can't reveal certain things that might be classified. But lately China has made it very clear that they are intent on retaking Taiwan.

They see that as one of their provinces. If they do that militarily if they were to attack her invading course we arm and train them how should we respond and would we be willing to take military action to defend Taiwan and I know you might be limited in some of your answer to a liability note. This note how the trumpet ministration have of this issue.

It was Wesley when you know that every meeting I had with every Chinese official. I met with she thinking about what Juan Shea and will need all the senior national security team. Every meeting was Taiwan first.

You only Taiwan alone. This is ours going to were going to go take that island an island. By the way, that was never part of a line China but they prepared what they use the word reunification. This would in fact be an invasion policy was to make sure they were never in a position where they could do this and they always knew that the enormous cost that they even hinted in a kinetic way going after Taiwan and so we provided them F-16s through the sales of military weapons systems. We provided them with political support. I made the decision to allow our diplomats to meet with them just like they would.

Went to Clement from any other country wheat we set the conditions for deterrence so that the risk that we would have to confront that complex problems that would be very very low. I think the colonies appreciated that. I know it give them greater freedom and autonomy that that the recall United States of America since it seemed like it was an economic war yeah you targeted the economic battle, but I think we were also seen the reports now and it's Chinese not trying to hide this about their expansion into the Atlantic so they tried to consider looking to operate. Now it open.

I a military base so that they've got. They got a presence in the Atlantic incident looking at spots in Northwest Africa. If you see if you look at a map of Africa and looking where the Chinese have got ports that they've invested in, and other facilities. It's it they got head of the Indian Oceanside within to also expand into the Atlantic. I mean this is again. We've got long-term interest that we be overprotected since World War II and inside the we have reasons to be operating around the world. This is this is a next level of aggression that is not just economic Institute to pick alarm bells should be going off the course military outpost culture booty a very strategic report location working on another one in a nether, strategically important location for caulk lot are how Pakistan and there are reports that the looking island not too far from Hawaii island far short inside the Pacific in the eastern Pacific much near United States of America. We have to make sure that pre-and open trade is possible that the Chinese don't have the capacity to exert political coercion against the people in those places and deliver the Chinese strategic outpost which they can restrict the capacity for American for the world to engage in activity that is right, billions of people out of poverty over the last hundred years.

What if you are still this position. I think that the words have consequences. The signals that we since of our Secretary of State goes on.

Does interviews type is how aggressive China is more like her to do anything to stop it at that. That deceives giving them like the green light to think there's a way to reverse it quickly and there if you go back to bringing peace through strength yet to demonstrate enormous resolve yet to be prepared with a punch you in the back to be able prepared to confront them when they're spying at your university.

Your biggest gunship to close the consult like we did used to deck yet to take real concrete actions to demonstrate American resolve. If we do that we will we will push back against the Chinese commerce party and we will continue to live in a Republic where we have the capacity to live our life in the way we want. If we don't live in a world that looks a lot more like the authoritarian regime. China have to day inside of their own country.

Is it right there was a have to go to punch back right the face. They know that they act different back decades, ACLJ has been on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ live from Washington DC, and second, I think, very strong message set for stricter statement Pao the idea of you how you confront all of this would China. How does this change, they have to know that you're going to punch back after know that you're not going to announce to the world that when I get a duty to contain your aggression or the repression soliloquy will acknowledge that you are committing genocide in your own country, but we are not going to. We are not going to do anything about were not going to I were to try let international law and international norms of international rules be enforced by international agencies which are basely all in the back pocket of the Chinese and that the will just will just leave it to that.

It's the lead from behind versus the punch in the face United is a big difference there in the consequences of diplomacy, so I will you write your photos, 164 3110. A lot of people have been hanging on and what if those condos go to Richard first in California online. What a Richard and God. God bless all of you.

I appreciate what you're doing and thank you for my call. I just want to say that you know pretty much this is all our fault, whatever monies they have, you know, I look at my house.

I think the majority of its maiden China you know and and here. Pres. Trump was trying to bring companies back in here Biden goes again and starts raising taxes, corporate taxes and everything else in any talk about human rights. What about the slave labor. Any basically that slave labor. That's why everything so cheap and I you know I blame the American companies.

For this to work for you know it's all about money and it's it's it's what China is able to do is because of everything is made in China is pretty basic.

Now it was again it was we control and may we be allowed to get out of control and will it just like you know whether it's made in China made somewhere else. This is where we allow these massive economic investments that are taking those economic investments to expand their ability to be a superpower absolute door and we are tied to them economically and I think what is lost on many people in the Democrat party is the consequences. The second and third order effects as the caller alluded to to our tax policy to our trade policies and know it is companies leave America, there is less production of goods in America and we are we are tied to China economically.

They own.

Most of our debt are also tied to them. Trade wise because much of the stuff we use in America that used to be made in America is all made in China and and somehow another, our manufacturers as well as our political leaders need to start putting a divide between us and them so that were not so dependent on them during the Covidien a crisis of the last year. What we discovered is most of our medical equipment are present. Your personal protective equipment for covert it was made in China and so there was a shortage for a long long time's we've got to detach ourselves from this trade and economic dependence on China that is a long-term process, but how we tax corporations in America and our trade policies have a direct impact on that and sometimes I think is lost in our political leaders here to this idea. Again, that we will acknowledge all these parade of horrible such as engage in slave labor and we utilize it that you and your iPhone is built with that and genocide going on of Muslims and yet the world is not acknowledge it, but they do nothing about it. This is a we were letting them get away. Let literally with murdering their own people.

I think that's precisely correct.

I think the caller was precisely correct. So we have corporations and we have politicians who are to blame.

We have a tolerated the theft of our intellectual property with tolerated military spying by the Chinese and more influential leaders are co-opted by trying and so there is very limited pushback against Chinese aggression, Chinese agendas and yet then you have American corporations pushing back against voting bill of election integrity build in China.

I'm sorry in Georgia doing nothing about what's going on in China. It makes no sense our overdrive back to your calls would hundred 64, 31 to the challenges facing Americans for substantial time and are now free to insert constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice. ACLJ has been on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member.

Thank you. Not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about our life-changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists ramifications of 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the Obama care means many ways your membership is empowering the right to life question mission life today online/secular to your focus to what hundred 682. That's what hundred 64 3110. Julie's caught this up or at a California online for a Julie Walker secular you're on the air flight about the panel and try Pompeo, but all of you are so smart phone for minute what Lincoln said, our purpose is not to contain China to hold back and keep it down to five and the understanding of America and our identity and our goal the world was similar to mine upon the side. We are not alert a Christian country I can print on both statement deeper sucking statements about our very identity and role moral to the country and I'm very concerned about China spying on me personally is the sentence and I'm convinced they know everything I do for my cell phone and pretty start mapping social credit system, the United States, like my cell it careful I care I think you hit on the right point which is that it's it's a huge shift in the United States, realized Washington the idea that it just like everybody's on the payroll.

Everybody's on their payroll there not to stand in the way they don't have the same it's not is taboo is like accepting and we haven't made it because of all the goods I could talk about the idea that phones the technology. The list goes on and on. So the idea that you would receive funding from Chinese owned businesses will represent Chinese interest in Washington. It's not as taboo is a say representing Russian interest or or some other other country, which the US is made out to be a pariah even if they not posing as big of a threat but yet the Chinese. They have thrown the money around. In fact I would say many ways it's mainstream. Jordan is not just the economic interest but it's also the infiltration into our government leadership on we haven't even talked about the issue that were involved with or involving Congressman's wall while who was clearly compromised with a Chinese spy and yet Jordan. He remains on committees that get classified information were not even taking it seriously inside the Democrat leadership in the House of Representatives to make sure that the people that are responsible for getting this information aren't compromised by the Chinese. That should tell you something of a Jordan I would sound when attacked back, just very quickly to something a secretary Pompeo talked about because he talked about tangible solutions that should be coming out of the State Department. If you think about just a couple of examples we really have seen a very wide shift in how the State Department respond to me at the end of the trump administration. You had the designation of genocide of the weaker people. You also had the Trump administration getting tough on the economic side of the trade side and now when you find out that a US contractor. Honeywell was was losing secrets was leaking secrets to the Chinese.

You can't even get a serious a response from the State Department on that. Those are the kind of specifics behind the scenes at the State Department that have to be happening, but I just don't think they're taking it seriously. Jordan, that doesn't feel that way it it it feels like they are try to do everything possible not to not to over this issue.

Everything but working to let the world deal with this which is which is what sick today because it will let the world deal with it but would like to take the lead in containing containing Chinese aggression and he came up with the line because it aggression that internecine repression domestically.

That's, I think you gotta fight back and then he Says recognizing about absolutely. And I think that is the long-term strategy of the Biden administration. Apparently, the Biden administration is prepared to confront Russia, notwithstanding the fact that at least in my opinion Russia is less of a strategic threat than China. China's tentacles in the United States both economically and politically are absolutely huge and they're very very influential within the academic community. So there are a large number of apologists for the Chinese government who work for our leading educational institutions and who have profited from that relationship and they continue to provide cover and then you add into this equation.

Corporations.

Corporations continue to carry the water for the Chinese government, and it goes from textile companies. It goes to companies that are producing our cell phones, you name it we are advancing China's interests step-by-step and there's very little response by the Biden administration and for the foreseeable future. The possibility arises that Joe Biden in the Biden administration will simply take pages out of the Neville Chamberlain handbook. This is Dick Scott of North Dakota line 3 fewer doctors there, 1-800-684-3110. That's what hundred 68431 was your help big of a deal. You do believe that this Chinese threat is the guys is not just economically, globally and also the military I will hate to welcome the secular on their all cool article on already going on on the 50,000 acres of land in Texas and another tenant is attempting to buy hundred and 30,000 acres next to Laughlin Air Force Base: tomorrow so it's just not that they're all around. Our edges were allowing them to infiltrate our country to use so this is a support policy to a Wes this is a the writ was the richest people in China, former military general. This I did it.

There is no way Russia to China and Russia.

When either that will allow a former top military officials in the United States to buy up their properties near military base and of course all of these businesses in China week they they come with these corporate names with their state owned or state invested so there is a always an interest in the Communist Party in China always has an interest there so there is no private business know they general the general is rich and powerful, but he is still part of the machine. All the businesses there have a connection some direct some indirect but a stilly a real vivid connection to the Chinese Communist Party and yet they are not only buying land in Texas that's the other thing China the billionaire submitters in China are buying real estate all across America or their buying interest in our companies all across America. And yet the odd thing about this Jordan is that in some of the though WTO policies as well as some of our climate policies. China is still considered laughable as it may seem as a developing nation. John Kerry met with China over the last week talking about climate control and what have you, and they are still specified as a developing nation on client if it is one of the richest nations in the world. Their buying influence all over the world. Some of these military bases that are building in Africa and along the Indian Ocean there there as well as in the Middle East. They are buying influence their going into those governments buying land but more strategically their buying influence their gut. It is their gold not just to be a superpower and they've made this very clear. They want to be the world's only superpower, both economically and militarily. This is this is I think it boils that all this we come back for the next break we are coupled with the spirit renting more your cause a lot of phone calls come in at 100-684-3110 but I do it to John's because I think we would have to try to just a think it's it's unique because I have a different answer. John now that I would they be 10 years ago a job on the secular you're on their gut takes out the love that we might Pompeo I'm not great and I really my question is that it seems like history repeats itself. Germany and Japan were pretty unlikely allies in World War II and now we are seeing a rotten come along China and one is a largely Muslim country. One is a communist atheist country and we are practicing all right appeasement in my view right now in America in political development in pharmacology which Richard talked about how it's really our fault. This Holly body.

It's what we do it.

Our daily decisions just like to know what you think about the future, especially in terms of biblical prophecy with China and Iran exist. You don't have to look at prophecy you look at this I say it with the different current as is. Instead, the Chinese a decade ago, you would say they would basics look the other way on ideology. That's why they've got so heavily vested after they went there to. They were there for economic purposes. They were exploitive, extremely of the resource in these countries corrupt shield buying off leaders not none of this trickling down to the people of these countries, the investments in China was making this really have an ideology. They're able to work in that that's where they're able to work with Iran who has this had a serious religious ideology. The Chinese don't but they have the shared interest and I think they are developing ideology. That's right, the Differ the way I was maybe a decade ago were start to see if the next phase of China, which is not just as an economically developing country but is now the country tried to move into the space as a military superpower that's different that's different position transmittable type of only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, planned parenthood's role in what Obama care means to discover many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online/challenges facing Americans for substantial time and are now free to store constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress to get in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms, and that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ secular to your focus to what hundred 684-3110 contrast to how this restriction and the current Secretary of State Blake. It responds what it's about Russian by the way, I will say that even though they talk tougher on Russia on the trigger take the right actions there either.

Any Russians amassing massive meta-troops and the adventure was so illustrate their shortcuts.

It doesn't have the kind of economic power to wield around the world to take a listen and how different, how much more cavalier. It sounds coming from the same Secretary of State what it has to do with the with the with the Russians what present by the said very clearly and repeatedly as if Russia acts recklessly or aggressively as it did with the solar winds. Cyber intrusion added as it did with interference in our elections as it did with what it's done to Mr. Vivaldi, then we will respond say this one is the the election issue. Again, this is hacking issue that we got to the point where I mean everything that was found was that nothing was changed. Nothing was done. They were they were doing things I'm not save the Russians. She get a pass on anything but we know their wrongdoing. Think about the Alexi Diwali situation. He's opposition leader.

There is been this horribly mistreated, poisoned, arrested, apparatus family, I threatened to add yet.

Okay that is a good that's bad and there.

They're very careful what they're doing there at the same time though, is that genocide that same Secretary of State Harry will acknowledge that there is a genocide ongoing in China genocide ongoing in Russia as lab report is not easy, but it made a big guy, but that can get a genocide may be carrying out a conflict in the Ukraine. But in actual genocide so people he put steel one opposition leader, the, the all the that the hoax that said that the Russia rate election the US which is not the case and you were ignoring genocide absolutely so there is a clear and unmistakable lack of proportionality going on here. First, we should note that China has interfered in our elections. That's number one number two. We know that China continues to engage in genocide. There are hundreds of thousands of Muslims imprisoned or encamped in China. There are hundreds of thousands of Christians imprisoned in China. This is now going on. So what is Sec. Bullington's response to that his response is oh we will continue to follow international rules but we will not attempt to contain China that raises a quintessential question, which is why not, why not confront the Chinese why not Secretary of State Pompeo has said, why not punch them in the nose. Why not send out all our resources to confront China from Africa to Asia to South America. I think the answer of course is the Biden administration has already predetermined that they are prepared to cave to Chinese aggression and that I think is a huge problem going forward for the United States now to go to. I cared Oklahoma line to a caramel consecutively. Are there, you are right there and here getting yelled.

We just want to be left alone that we've been awake to China and what they're doing for a long time you know they get a global issue there in Australia became Wang there's a lot of pushback by certain people in Australia try to a quick assigning our ports. The local global New Zealand announced last day works kind of stepping back outside of the partnership. It's been contain China in that region of the world.

New Zealand said there out because the Chinese economic interest. New Zealand is so important to to New Zealand's economy.

They like it they don't want to be seen is standing in the way China doll that we had that relationship is called a quad which includes Australia and the thing and maybe it used to be New Zealand that that this would date the financial commercial connection is so powerful and China knows this and even you look at the United States. We are not we we may be in a group trying to counter China at least on paper, but what are we doing practically source financially, economically, commercially, to counter China and to decrease our dependence on them that were not doing much at all and they they will continue to buy influence and they use that influence for their own domination and and the future of China and how it how it dominates the world.

It is not looking good because they are marching unabated and the world including the United States. We are not doing much to stop them. Talk is cheap for this. If this is the issue that foreign policy wise that there's obviously always lots of issues and she could talk about Russia all day and night, and I think it's easier for America's baby to judge just because a been seen as the enemy, and Washington goes to great lengths not to paint China in that same light, and in their yard that we know because while the economic investment that they they been treated differently but I do see now. At least the Republicans are willing to call tried out so whether or not they had economic interest in the past would shut the Chinese whether the business of the past, the Chinese, they are realizing that okay we gotta put the brakes on here I think really the first serious effort happened in the last administration.

I do see continued effort inside the Republican Senate I mentioned Marco Rubio early in the broadcast I think he's been on this for some time and I'm here.

Here's the real truth Jordan to actually do what it takes to address a rising power like Janet, you need a President.

I mean, so much of this authority lies with the chief executive. You need the President of the United States to implement a lot of these things in the coming echo Terry blinking might want and improve relationship with China. I think all of us can want that if they were an honest partner, but Jordan during the course of this broadcast. We've listed out out all of the ways that they have demonstrated they are not a trustworthy apart. A partner so you need a President who will take it seriously. I agree with you that the Senate Republicans may be in the right place in this Jordan. We need more than that though Jean Idaho final holiday hey Jean secular on the right, actually I think Leon felt like property or a lien on select property rights heavily like the cut you off and that is money and legally leading to contaminants like I didn't buy anything more American elections released because it seems to me as it is funding his family. The funding is foundation funding is instituted. I think he gets a question that people realize the Chinese it was. I don't think so is because it it will be incorporate a Chinese Corporation that invests and they'll say out.

That's not really the Chinese, but that is the Chinese. I think that is what people have to understand is it they may might have a corporate setting. Dave Bailey of 56. It might sound like a corporate name might sound like it's independent it's not. There's no business operating there at the level where it's you know that they are investing in by US properties or or economically here that is not controlled by the Chinese Congress party. They have a stake in everything she had to look past the name you Nazis generic names of whose vesting looked at who was behind it not be afraid to say what best Chinese government is the same government that is committing a genocide of its own people how much power do we want them to have internationally to our own affairs as well.

Domestically in the United States. We can talk about it on it but we got to do something about it and that we are a survey by having people like sick. They pump a lot pose. The alternative idea of responding.

For decades, ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member. Thank you. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ