Did House Impeachment Managers Falsify Evidence?

Today I'm sick you noted house impeachment managers actually also evidence of another private citizen during the impeachment trial. Talk about that and more today on sexual life Washington DC phone lines are open questions right now: one 806 843-110-1800 68412, your host will soon update 104 of the trial. This is day one, of present trumps legal teams opportunity to put forward their opening remarks, which were hearing for a bit on this actually think were hearing may only be for four hours or less and tell people what that would mean to the timeline because, would you go right into the question answer portion it's four hours long and have like I like a normal eight hour day get wrap that part up closing statements, possibly tomorrow, and that you either vote on witnesses or there is no vote over this is and this is the final vote on it on the weather to convict or acquit. You certainly could your name. We speculated about this yesterday. We thought that maybe the defense team would not need nearly the 16 hours over two days. That is allotted to them now look, I think as they started their certainly can retain that that right. In other to get in their arguments and see where they want to yield back but there was actually a question posed one of the attorneys today whether or not they thought they could wrap in the first three hours, and he said that that he thought they might might go a little bit longer than that, but Jordan yeah it if they only took you know four hours that that would leave four hours available for today to moving to that four hours of debate on our questions from senators and then you just have the debate over witnesses Jordan you speculated early in the week that maybe this could wrap as soon as Saturday if that kind of timeline rolled out today, you could definitely be seeing that in Jordan. Even if they take the entire day AAA conclusion to this trial on Sunday is certainly now in play know I want to go to something from yesterday. They have not yet started there about to start will play some of the defense today of course for you on the radio that's happening live. That is not yet begun. But let me show you something up on the screen right now if you want your Facebook and periscope. This was a tweet used by Eric swallow the house managers yesterday tweet you that he's to ensure we saw a tweet from Jennifer Lynn Lawrence and she in the tweet that they showed up on the screen. She has the blue check from Twitter. Maybe she is a verified account.

I have a verified account was that mean you speak with some kind of thought you speak with to some kind of group you represent your organization your media member so you speak to with some kind of authority maybe are held to a higher borrowed on Twitter for what kind of statement you put out will guess what that blue Mark is it on her twitter account. She's not does not have a verified account so who are the house managers, team falsified the evidence presented to those US Senators what what what kind of trouble will they face but it gets even worse because they they misinterpreted what she said they highlighted that we are bringing the Calvary, Mr. Pres. In the present trumps retweeted that I want you to understand that the Calvary that she's referencing is the religious Calvary not Calvary yet Calvary Calvary in the religious sense, refers to almost a bringing Christ to Washington DC refers, of course, to the where the crucifixion literally took place, but then you've got get Eric swallow a military man himself who gets that term confusing to write to Harry on this with Calvary, which is again bringing in like troops with Calvary. The religious sense, which is spelled differently one has available for the V. What does it absolutely, and the words are pronounced differently if we are going to be precise. I think we have clear and unmistakable evidence of possible prosecutorial misconduct which deprives the defendant in this particular case of former President Crump of due process within the meaning of the law. Having Jennifer large. She tweeted never inches and have a verification or enervate verified on Twitter. So why did my tweet using the factory impeachment include a verification bag.

I'm assuming Democrats faked it. Someone had to put that there on their team to make it seem like she was speaking to more people. She had more followers, she had more of a movement behind her and not take away for maybe maybe shift she wasn't verified on Twitter they were lying to you and they were lying about words, the challenges facing Americans or substantial time in our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack is more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now.

ACLJ has been on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress to get in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do or work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms and then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally and publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the what Obama care means to the pro-life of the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right to request your free copy of mission in life today online ACLJ/secular radio. I want to go into this Michael Vanderveen from present trumps legal team Scotus of the slides is the beginning of their chance to rebut to go and lay out their case for why the President should not be convicted… Take a listen live of his remarks. He then laid out a series of legislative steps that should be taken to improve democratic accountability going forward such as passing universal voter ID legislation banning dollar harvesting requiring proof of sedition citizenship to vote and turning out strong in the next primaries not only Presidents. These are not the words of someone inciting a violent insurrection not only President trumps speech on January 6 but indeed his entire challenge to the election results was squarely focused on how the proper civic process could address any concerns to the established legal and constitutional system. The President brought to this. Is this the party there dressing right away that this present this idea of the stop, the steel of that that was somehow incitement to violence Harry that the idea that you can. There were legal challenges you can bring those in court and that's with the present was doing. You can like those you cannot like those you like the proposals he wants for the future elections. You can say that you know there should have been. All of these mail-in ballots without verification and that's something everybody can debate and that's that something will get impeached of absolutely anything on this very program we have pointed out some of the election deficiencies, particularly with respect to allowing individuals to mail in their ballot, even though the light state legislatures have not allowed that process to go forward.

So I think it is clear beyond question that the President was within his rights to argue for election integrity and election reform. Those are clearly bipartisan issues well within the mainstream and they do not constitute incitement to violence take elicited this this go back live again. I want to go back like this is them showing the Democrats objecting to present trumps election 2016 the state of Georgia, on the grounds that the electoral vote in motivating design objectives certificate from the state of North Carolina getting the ultimate state of North Carolina.

I object that I object to the certificate from the state of Alabama. The electors were not lawfully certified as assigned by sin, not as of yet. In that case injection cannot be entertained. Injection cannot be entertained in order ballot is the Democrats over and over again objecting to the certification present trumps election right before that the President's attorney said many of you in this room, Democrat Senators, including some of those house impeachment managers Jamie Raskin was in that video but you also kept up a narrative for four years then that the Russians were the reason present trumps on the election for four years.

You said the election was stolen and and yet no one, no one is trying to take away your right to say that whether not we we we fundamentally disagree with proving you wrong on that we've gone through. Muller found no evidence of that, we went through the Ukraine impeachment present truck was acquitted and vindicated never going to this again, but they had the same lie that the election was stolen by the Russians while so much of the underpinning of this case, Jordan is rooted on the fact that there were objections to the counting of the electoral votes based on some of the irregularities that happened and what that video writing was able to see the whole thing Jordan, but even this the snippet I saw there when it conclusively shows is that there is significant precedent for raising those objections on the floor and the precedent was set not just by Democrats Jordan.

It was set by the people bringing this very impeachment Emmy Jamie Raskin was one of the people that rose in the floor the House of Representatives in a previous election to object to the counting.

So it's just sort of a regular course of order and I would say this, and yesterday we said that what's good for the goose is good for the gander look on either of these issues. The First Amendment argument or whether or not it's appropriate to object to the counting of electoral votes during I think it's okay for you to have either opinion but guess what the standard has to apply to both sides. If one side cannot object to the counting of electoral votes, then neither can the other side in the fact that Sheila Jackson Lee and Jamie Raskin, and a whole slew of others have made a regular practice of objecting to the counting of those votes Jordan. It shouldn't have been any surprise that on January 6. A special election like the one we just had that objections were to be raised. They set that precedent. Now their opinion there impeachment hopes on saying that is not permissible to get back that we start the show because people may wonder why we say that they may have lied yesterday in their presentation admit misled cinders intentionally, which would get you in a lot of trouble legally in a real court of law, but a playlist is Eric swallow yesterday by 30 x 39 take a listen. This is not just any old protests. President Trump was inciting something historic.

The cavalry was coming and he was organized in her post, Miss Lawrence tags Kylie Kremer the organizer of the event whose post, we just saw Pres. Trump retweet again. You see, this is all connected.

Okay, he forgets a couple things. She obviously one for military guy wasn't reading the words in front of them is inching towards her tweet to Calvary on the West Smith of this was here in the military be also made a minister big difference when you use the word Calvary and Calvert yeah it is two words that are often confused but Eric swallow knows knows knows the difference.

I'm sure this is embarrassing, at least for us, religious types, you know, it should be embarrassing for Eric swallow well, but I doubt that he will be ashamed or embarrassed cavalry in what we call in the military. They can in old days was a military unit mounted on horseback.

Today, the cavalry has unique missions.

We still have the cavalry around Jordan and their mission is to scout and perform rapid movements on the battlefield as we see in the in the military to shape the battlefield. I was assigned for several years to a cavalry unit has to have my steps in my boots instead of horses. Today they use armor motorized vehicles and helicopters that Calvary, which is what Miss Lawrence used is a blatantly religious term. It refers to Jesus crucifixion and but in modern parlance, it refers to any any period of personal suffering what Miss Lawrence was drawing attention to was that they were leading a Bible study and a prayer vigil. She was not even owned… Nor was she at the capital and all this was taking place. She was in her hotel room with a pastor from the town where I live now Julia Tennessee Greg Locke is part of the global vision Bible church. She was in a hotel doing what she had called her what she tweeted the President they were going to do and that is praying for God to intervene in the affairs of America. They were praying for Pres. Trump. They were praying for the nation that more than likely were praying for the members of Congress. So it is a total misunderstanding what a lot of people's part between Calvary, which is a referring to a crucifixion of Jesus, and cavalry, which is bringing in reinforcements to swallow. It was using it but you know again Saul will epitomizes not only one who does not understand the religious significance of what Miss Lawrence was tweeting, but also he epitomizes that pension for the Democratic managers to jump to conclusions and to grasp at any innuendo or conjecture that fits their narrative and impugns Donald Trump.

He should acknowledge what he did.

He should apologize to Kylie and Jennifer Lawrence because he took what they said and what they were about which was praying and leading a period of prayer on January 6 not attacking the capital are trying to do anything like that. He should apologize Jordan, but I tell you what, I doubt I seriously doubt that he will Jennifer would Lawrence deserves an apology.

She also deserves an apology for the editing.

I wouldn't Harry how much trouble would you be in with the judge. If you edited someone's remarks that you're putting into evidence to make them as though they had this special account was verified by Twitter. They somehow led a movement that they had this kind of influence that gets you may or may not have, but had never applied to get that check work, but that someone win in their sense a lot like when they were the FBI lawyer was taking things out of the evidence to get the phis award on cars are part of page and hear someone on the Democrat team that they work with, inserted the verification mark the present Trump as I'm sure Eric swallow has I have but but most folks don't on twitter and she doesn't but they made it so it's something she had this can influence over people.

Not only do they misinterpret her words, but they also put a fake blue checkmark next her name sucks.

Your analysis is a spot on Jordan in Miller versus Pate, the court overturned the conviction obtained after the prosecution had represented to the jury that a pair of men's shorts found near the scene of an attack belong to the defendant and they were stained with blood. The defendant showed in habeas corpus proceedings that no evidence connected him with the shorts and furthermore that the shorts were not in fact link blood stained and the prosecution knew these facts. That is clearly analogous to Eric swallow while some misconduct in my opinion here, and you can argue that it was deliberate misconduct. Why because they added the blue checkmark and they misconstrued were twitter blindingly different and I think this amounts to prosecute territorial error and that demands either a mistrial or a clear acquittal us again were continuing to cover what will be a much shorter presentation by prep present Trump's legal team and the defense. The present we come back with more only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally and publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right to life question free copy of mission life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans a substantial time and or value freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades. ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress to get in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms than remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ secular radio we are to your phone calls at 1-800-684-3110 at 2064 3110 monitoring closely. What will likely be that the, the, the opening remarks in the trial portion of this by the presence legal team that's on the ground for the impeachment which will be probably over with early this afternoon, then there will be the question we where they go right into the question and answer period, which is to be given four hours to the use all that for hours and then do we have a vote by this week. It.

The question will then be on witnesses that the team right now is doing exactly what people expect. They played the Chuck Schumer sound played all the objections including by Jamie Raskin plus or listen again to presence of state and there not been a stop after election day there not been allowed up and they should not.

Such rhetoric continued even as hundreds of police officers across the nation were subjected to violent assaults at the hands of angry mobs. A man claiming to be inspired by the junior senator from Vermont came down here to Washington DC to watch a softball game and kill as many senators and congressmen as he could, cannot be forgotten that Pres. Trump did not blame the junior senator, the senior senator from Maine has had her house surrounded by angry mobs of protesters. When that happened and unnerved her one of the house managers I forget which one tweeted Crimea River under the standards of the house impeachment article. Each of these individuals should be retroactively censored, expelled or punished or impeached for inciting violence by their supporters. Unlike the left Pres. Trump has been entirely consistent in his opposition to mob violence. He opposes it. All I want to just show. I think that is a very effective moment right there on the table to go to Stanford. She washes Washington DC at the senators. Obviously some huddled with him and he was Mike Lee Ted Cruz Lindsay Graham not unusual by the lake is not like a normal trout that we are that they're also sitting at jurors within the with the legal team course Democrats be doing that with the house managers but that that this is that I think the very effective way to begin is that all of you under this same precedent would be set should be sent home yet agree that during first of all, the point of the three senators huddling with the defense team. If that's not gonna be allowed in the ED submission of evidentiary material yesterday and it would be allowed in a court of law was good have to be thrown out, as well as a look. We stated many times this is a political trial.

That's why that sort of thing happens of the Jordan yeah I the little piece you played there. I think that is extremely effective for a couple of reasons. Every single senator in that chamber is engaged in this kind of rhetoric and you can like it or you cannot like it, but if this standard is going to be upheld in every single one of them is going to get a be subject to an accusation whether they need to be centered or worse, they need to be impeached and enduring I would say one more thing, I think it would set a very dangerous dangerous precedent on on First Amendment because if were going to have a robust First Amendment if organ have the ability to engage in speech that is unpopular or maybe even contrary to the views of the majority. Jordan it's the that's the exact speech that is gonna need to be protected. You don't have to like it but it's gotta be protected. It was Eric swallow himself, who tweeted boo-hoo who about Collins being harassed like that at her home absolutely consistent with the character of Eric swallow. Well, this is an individual who has launched his career, at least in part, even in California based on vitriolic meanwhile he has also maintained a relationship with an individual who has been identified by the United States government as a spy for China and yet he sits on a House intelligence committee. So Eric swallow well has never been accused of being the brightest candle in the darkness called the House of Representatives. I think it is clear beyond question that he has engaged at least in my humble opinion, and prosecutorial misconduct, particularly with respect to this individual citizen, Jennifer Lynn Lawrence who was encouraging people to do what to attend a prayer meeting. He basically took her tweet and said that means brining the military Calvary and basically launch an insurrection.

This is clearly and unmistakably, at least in my opinion a falsehood, and it amounts to duplicity and prosecutorial misconduct of the first-order. The fact that they yesterday than I thought was shocking as well. Was it out of the mouth of rep. Carson, Jamie Raskin, the lead house manager was that the First Amendment does not apply that first fall in the impeachment trial.

You can use whatever defense you want because we talked about sudden normal trial.

So if you want to bring up the First Amendment protecting that you certainly have the right to try to convince the sinners of that for him declared null and void as he did yesterday to me was shocking. Take Lisette to house major Raskin.

I say that the First Amendment no longer applies to a private citizen being impeached Pres. Trump's last-ditch First Amendment arguments got nothing to do with the actual facts of the case. He's been impeached for inciting violent insurrection against the government incitement to violent insurrection is not protected by free speech.

There is no First Amendment defense to impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. The idea itself is absurd except for we can't even put it, Mark really fan in any double benefit you did at the First Amendment is not a defense. Well, that's up to him it's up to his defense team and up to the senators to decide if they want to standard where they could all be held accountable for words. They say a similar and they played all the soundbites for everyone to hear but but the idea that the First Amendment plays no role in the United States and in the trial. This is a constitutional attorney J rescued two teachers. Common-law. He knows I think what's coming out of his mouth. Or maybe is not listening to himself.

Sounds so dangerous when our First Amendment right to free speech is such an important right well it's a great point that he doesn't get to choose the defense he could've chosen what to prosecute. They chose what they chose and nothing was the greatest election but I is not his judgment dear Jordan, this is what I would ask manager asking is your First Amendment right disappear after you leave office because if so you better be ready and you know Jordan, you know, in article 1, section 3, clause 7 that we've talked about a lot makes it very clear that when an official leaves office. They are subject to criminal prosecution still liable to the laws of the land during if you're still gonna be liable to the laws of the land. The fundamental rights and protections under the law, they must apply as well.

Otherwise, you are your subject a lot to prosecution without the fundamental rights that just can't be the case, and I think manager asking knows it is not the case that he doubled down, take a listen, the whole First Amendment smokescreen is a completely irrelevant distraction from the standard of high crimes and misdemeanors governing a President who is violated his oath of office. They have to they have to build that bar to act as it is just a given that it's a distraction because the hikers or smears they have to prove those high crimes and mysteries.

They failed because yesterday they kept going and going with video splicing and fake tweets and tweets that were read correctly and in misusing evidence and never really getting to the point about what did the President do that actually violated their articles of impeachment and in this whole I this attack and first moved to be a systems study scary to a lot of Americans absolutely and it basically places the First Amendment under threat by the United States Congress and an alleged constitutional lawyer coming up in our second half hour Rick rebels joining us about issue involving the nominee to be the next day CIA director during the study for decades now ACLJ is been on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking.

If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow live and now secular secular radio will continue to break down at the very effectively right now. Doug showed for the present legal team is called this trial a constitutional cancel culture. He talked about how they set them a big deal about Heather bringing new video new video to show yesterday with us with any trial where their promise to process as they were the present with former Pres. Trump would receive due process you get to do that, you could say this is this is new and not have the defense know anything about what you're about to do so again. He talked about that. He talked about the the constitutional cancel culture here heard about the First Amendment. Should it be by the way, I just a side note here, Gov. Cuomo, who is being impeached right now is it what what we should be talking about a guy whose lead non-elected officials collect their secretary is a much more important position, it's Ellie it's artists. It's like a secretary can assistant role is like a secretary of the state that's in a is not its appointed, not elected, admitted that they held back the number of people who died in the nursing homes from cobra 19 and the number of people he put with over 19 into the nursing homes because they didn't want Donald Trump to have the info they admitted this on a phone call with Democrat their Democratic colleagues in the state legislature. There. That is what we should be talking about right now in America is a nation's government for larger states of the country had his team cover-up intentionally the number of people who are being put into nursing homes with overnight team leading to the number of deaths that they also didn't they also covered up even the Democrat Atty. Gen. there and that at that Democrat state sinners there are calling this a serious problem. Will he face any any real action consequences for his remarks.

Any at all. With that, that they will, and that again is not being discussed on MSNBC today secular get discussed on CNN say because we having an unconstitutional impeachment trial of a private citizen, but to me, you know Wes you brought up that this could put a truth on her dignity. You know whether or not this is just political and enemy. I guess we don't expect much in politicians anymore when it comes to actual how they conduct themselves like air swallow well, but this is again we have a real scandal, a real issue that could lead to impeachment Gavin Newsom be recalled where the people utilizing a state effort to go forward with it. That is a state constitutional effort to gather the signatures you can have the recall election yet that's not getting any attention know and if you really think about it. The listen was going on, yelling at the Congress today.

The blinding hypocrisy and duplicity and irony itself is lost absolutely lost on these Democrats you know and in either dimension during the break to you in a court of law. There are certain rules there doing things that they would not be allowed in a court of law. But even though they don't have to follow those rules. You would think that to these Democrat house managers into the Senate that such things as honor and truth and integrity would still apply that you may not have to follow you know that the procedures of the courtroom. You have to speak the truth, you have to have some honor and some integrity in the things you're saying and that along with their their ability to be embarrassed seems to be totally lost from this group. They said have their say right now that we have reason to believe house managers manipulated evidence and selectively cut footage if they did, and if this were a court of law, they would face sanctions we been talking about that since yesterday I and and will and not fan you just said this in our chat. It's pretty dangerous to ever say that the First Amendment is quote completely is a quote completely irrelevant distraction.

How disturbing that is. During a speech to a fundamental right that everyone of us has an and we can be very careful with lowering the standard in a formal proceeding like this because that's the standard that all of us rely on including up. By the way Jordan, those of us who are not verified on twitter. You can attack our First Amendment rights when we depend on you know." We got a lot more talk about your 100 684 31 to fewer doctors on air. That's what hundred 684-3110 secular take two days to slice and dice the entire house managers opening trying impeachment argument is present from let me tell you that will be right back in secular radio that ACLJ.org challenges facing Americans for substantial time in our value freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack is more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress to get in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member.

Thank you. Not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing work, become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally and publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right to life question free copy of mission life today online ACLJ/broadcast record of a new piece is big news because initially he liked the idea that the CA nobody Joe Biden put forward was coming from the diplomatic Coronet, the Intel community but now you got serious concerns because of that person's ties to China and Chinese funding directly for their previous working for their payroll to pay their salary so he'll be joining us recruit now. ACLJ special advisor for foreign-policy national security in the next segment of the broadcast. Because I don't want to forget the other issues that are going on right now I want to play for you.

Doug Schon presents attorney as well. They're getting into the part really what you need to talk.

Finally, the President says peacefully and patriotically. But it started with how they manipulate audio and video in their presentation. Take a listen.

We have reason to believe the house managers manipulated evidence and selectively edited footage if they did, and this were court of law, they would face sanctions from the judge. I don't raise this issue lightly rather is a product of what we have found in just a limited time we have had since we first saw the evidence here with you this week so they can they talk about that that right now the show.

The cutting the video races to peacefully protest and and patriotically protest at the capital how they cut that out, but they also hit on exactly what we started with today of the broadcast.

And this is great Harry the and will get it from you I will get this out of everybody is the tweet. Now we know something new about the tweet, which we didn't see because they had corrected this. I guess before it was shown but they had put January 31, 2020 21 the streets on the screen from that they that they had put up is January 3 tweets and the reason why is because the this was not an actual tweet.

This is a re-creation of a tweet. The house managers told the President's defense team by recruit creating the tweet they did a couple things they backdated it. They the wrong supposedly fix that before they showed it put the blue checkmark in the shows verified count and of course misinterpreted Calvary, which is a religious reference. Not a reference to Calvary, in the sense of military.

So what we have here Jordan is an absolute Festival of falsehoods and duplicity masquerading as alleged evidence of misconduct and incitement when and if you actually look at the real evidence, it is clear beyond question that Jennifer Lynn Lawrence was not inciting any riot, any insurrection she was encouraging people to go to a prayer meeting meeting and it is clear beyond question that Eric swelled well, who is known for his own commitment to duplicity, he decided, along with others to engage in a deconstruction of her tweet in order to, in my opinion, falsify evidence this is clear evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and I think it calls for either a mistrial or directed verdict.

If this were court of law in favor of the defendant. Here it is about the dates of this shocking this is new information, by the way did know this, as even we were going through how this tweet was put forward manipulated data on the very bottom of the screen manager Reston's computer screen. When we zoom into the picture, the date that appears is January 3, 2029 2021. Why is that the wrong because this is not a real screenshot that is working with. This is a recreation of a tweet, and you got the date wrong when you manufactured this graphic so there you go there's the manufacturing of the date that is new in the blue checkmark that this was somehow a verified account, take a listen. Look at the blue checkmark next to the Twitter username of the account retweeted by the President indicates that this is a verified account given the blue checked by twitter to indicate it is run by a public figure. The problem users real account is not verified and has no blue checkmark. As you can see this again this is destroying the evidence and it's taking those up. It's taking the emotion out of the trial and going straight to see the disc while presentation to show you that was being praised by the left. While they didn't do their due diligence did they. Harry, absolutely not. And so I think the Democrats clearly and unmistakably were sloppy.

They have continuously overplayed their hand and they have shown to the American people that they do not necessarily believe in truth they lack the commitment to the Constitution and to the rule of law and lack a commitment to due process. Why did they engage in this misconduct, which is provable because they hated prompts so much. They were blinded to their commitment to any integrity to the truth and I think at the end of the day. They have been wonderfully and marvelously expose before the entire nation, and more importantly before the Senate and I think this increases the odds that even the senators who were previously inclined to vote against a Pres. Trump will now vote in favor of an acquittal, because it's get it shows there are again they were not given the that the truth and we knew they were slicing and dicing, but then you know he they even had the guts I think. I think this is got from that that the present legal team to play those remarks from Charlottesville and show that that that all of their good sides and rear people I get for good people on both sides of that protest but not show the extended remarks were the present condemns neo-Nazis and condemns all those individuals are in the neo-Nazis and white supremacists right in the same remarks that the next day in the same remarks and yet the media never wanted to include that in the speech manufactured there there there overreaching every senator sitting in that room today, Democrat and Republican should be incensed ended in indignant that these house managers are trying to mislead them if their evidence was is great in a strong as they say that it is in that two-hour snap impeachment that they produce. On the other side of the capital building if it were really that strong. You wouldn't have to manufacture anything you wouldn't have to to come up with fake your twitter pages on the screen or change dates or misinterpret what Jennifer Lawrence meant when she was calling for a prayer meeting and they turned her call and is I love the way she said it she said y'all need Jesus boy, that's an understatement is an they really didn't need Jesus. But instead of bringing Jesus to Washington. The Democrats have turned it into an attack on the capital that is just blatantly dishonest and wrong and but the dishonest things they are doing these tactics just continue to come, that we also now they also picked up on what we picked up on right away. We would start to show Eric swallow misusing cavalry and Calvary take a listen manager swallow show you this tweet this week and he emphasized that this tweet reflected a call to us. He told you repeatedly that this was a promise to call in the cavalry for January 6 expressly led you to believe the President from supporter, believed that the President wanted armed supporters at the January 6 speech paramilitary groups. The cavalry ready for physical combat. The problem is the actual text is exactly the opposite. The tweeter promise to bring the Calvary, a public display of Christ's crucifixion.

A similar central symbol of her Christian faith with her to the President's speech, a symbol of faith, love and peace. They just never want to seem to read the text and believe what the text means that sexual sweeper that wife and I don't love the Constitution. I think you know finally a people try to seize it is not that difficult a meritless data shows that a great job right now but but it was it, with all the media, praise. It is not to be that difficult to show how they sliced and diced and when you slice and dice you start making errors even caught the heirs on Jamie Raskin to the tweets they're showing. You aren't even the real screenshots of tweets there adding things to it that they are misinterpreting words to tell you one thing and just not being honest about the rhetoric they use on their side, either, or the rhetoric that was used by Pres. Trump leading up to January 6 and on January 6 couple things during first of all, the cross of Calvary has enormous significance and meaning to me. So it's particularly offensive to me that that's that that's the switch that they are making the look at just in a more fundamental nature. Words have meanings and manager swallow is not permitted to take someone else's words and changed into to match a narrative that he is preselected in turn we see this a lot in Washington DC where a final narrative of final conclusion is chosen, and then you look around for facts and you even alter facts to match that predetermined narrative that is absolutely what happened in this case and I go back to something that I think Wes said a minute ago. Do I think it will impact final votes will look at Sen. Cassidy said the entire reason he switched his vote initially on constitutional jurisdiction was because of an effective argument if that argument that we just on the floor of the Senate is not effective. I don't know what it is. I suspect Sen. Cassidy is Reed reconsidering his vote as we speak navigate you hate about that now. The violent rhetoric used against Pres. Trump about punching him beating him and then in all those kind of things that thing is that's being played out surrounding people assessing the present. Even used by one of the members of Congress.

I will get back a Rick Grenell ACLJ specializes in foreign policy, national securities can be joyous, talk to us about this impeachment trial but also he's got a brand-new piece up@aclj.org and I want you all check that out after the broadcast day. He'll be talking about it this important how the Biden CA nominee billboards had a support until troubling revelations of his actions with China service business news going on as well. Only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally and the publication includes a look at all major ACLJ plainly Jesus were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists. The ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to the pro-life discover the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right to life question free copy of mission in life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans a substantial time and are now free to sort constitutional rights are under attack is more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ is going on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress to get in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. Here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms and then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us.

ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ to stay with us. The ACLJ Ethier because of media interviews later on this afternoon with Newsmax with those post as well. I continued analysis even after the present trumps a teamed they they make rest of their opening remarks earlier than not to take two whole days up what the question we did against the question answers today thin I don't know that we know the answer to that yet. It probably depends on how long they actually do go there. We don't know the answer. During the outside of this there it if if all of the time is taken. There's about 11 hours worth of proceedings left after the presentations are done so if they do get into those questions and if they get through the questions today that would shrink it to a maximum of about a seven hours of deliberations left that could definitely fit into tomorrow and that would leave a vote on Sunday so I think were moving to an end sooner rather than later. Jordan right now they are playing the mega clip of all mega clips of Democrat elected officials using the words fight in all the different ways they use the term fight. I think that he has its pretty interesting to see were try to connect ritornello it we do that will go to him on his new piece as well but I mean this is one of the longest ever and I think you are given the witless semi hit their stent tester get is a fight that is a guess it was upon strip present Trump as well. That is, that there they're showing right now, but again all this fighting language of the try to blame on the present that is again at the end of the day just normal political speech in there to showing that people are trying to indict any of these people in front to say that all of you should be a piece of St. if you your standard for Harry. You all should be impatient by the way, I think you should be in real trouble. Are these these house managers. I think what just happened in about an Atlas less than an hour is that they lied to the U.S. Senate. They manufactured evidence they misinterpreted words their splicing and dicing was even worse than we initially thought, and they should. They should they face serious trouble. We should be that liberal media should be mocking them today like they mock present Trump's attorneys on the first day because while Eric's while well probably just drain this and try to get any more Republican support in an in-house major basket is the ultimate one responsible for approving everything going forward.

Maybe they should've used it outside law firm to put the video together for them.

Maybe they should done the work themselves, absolutely. And maybe they should've extended due process to the defendant in this particular case, they should've had hearings they should've had witnesses and if they had done that they would not have made so many unforced errors. I think at the end of the day when all is said and done with respect to this particular case the house managers they should resign from the House of Representatives, and secondly, if possible, in their state. Those individuals should be recalled by the voters and if not thrown out at the earliest opportunity.

What they could still play a video of the allies is got out, so you got ritornello is joyous now at Rick video is still being played.

I did just listed our house managers have been shown Rick and will get you pieces. Second, we got to get five minutes with you and will probably Skype but that's okay. It will less than an hour that the presence attorneys were able to not only dismantle the case against present Trump but actually just destroyed the house managers. The fact that they manufactured tweets put blue checkmarks on people's which obviously don't know this when Calvary and Calvary and the idea of all this fighting word language. The video is still being played as I speak of these been going on for over three or four minutes right now. It didn't take. It took less than an hour for them to say everything you heard of these last two days was spliced in diced incorrect altered evidence that you be in serious trouble for.

If you as a house manager.

If you were real court of law is very clear that they have a weapon eyes dim Pete. They Politicize that they are using it as a political tool in maximizing to those that are watching because look at the house managers that Eric swallow and to Lou to the most unbelievably in out California Republic that Democrats who have been pushing a Russian collusion narrative or years they had literally been pushing the Beijing line to look over at Russia politicizing intelligence, politicizing every issue. They become the impeachment managers and what they do, they immediately politicize impeachment. I've been saying don't be surprised when, in the future. Impeachment just becomes a political tool used by both sides. Democrats of Groveland impeachment this it will get into this more to because they are still literally showing the video of just how many Democrats use the word fight and how the how aggressive they use it. They've also show the video of the others were more extremely sheepishly and you all of her that I would get your new piece rate because this is a change actually it's big news you initially like the idea Joe Biden had nominates him to head up the CIA who was from the diplomatic corps and not the intelligence community, but now you got a serious problem with the nominee with your new piece of an ACLJ.org about how that nominee had your support until their troubling revelations of their connections with China surface which is so troubling right now with with all that were even that you World Health Organization.

There's nothing see their China what the bobbin ministration has appointed several people who are very sympathetic to China and I think it's a big concern one when Bill Burns was nominated by Pres. Biden to head up the CIA. I like the fact that he was an outsider that he didn't grow up in the intelligence community learning.

The operational side but that he was an outsider as someone who consumes intelligence and could bring a perspective from the outside except this week we learned that for the last six years in his job as running an NGO. He's been darting towards China. He's been getting money from Chinese businessmen. He's been getting stabbed first on the hill to to go over to China and cozy up to the communist regime. This is a signal that he is the wrong person for the job. I changed my opinion on these new revelations. I think that the Senate should reject Bill Barton's as the nominee to run the CIA because of the recent revelations about China. This is administration the Biden administration that has demonstrated that weakness towards China. We certainly don't need somebody's cozy up to China the last six years and raised money from China running the most important intelligence agency, CIA, you know I Rick you got this up now to top it ACLJ.org, in which, just that we got about a minute have left but it's a serious piece really ought Sherry without getting all of our social media accounts we downer error E email as well. People sign up for that, or we can email ACLJI.org which kind of gives you a rundown email of all that that happened during the week at the ACLJ will make sure to include this. What will people learn in this piece because I think you this is this is a big thing that that you unfortunately something you thought was good is good. It is turned out to be just someone else's go-ahead, who's had China lining their pockets, but Bill Burns has had a diplomatic career of 33 years and utilized intelligence. Well, initially I thought it was a really good idea to have somebody from the outside, except once he retired in 2015. He spent the last six years really cozy enough to China and that revelation I think changes the whole nomination process for him to check that out. Good. Now Biden CIA nominee Bill Burns had my support until troubling revelations of his connections with China surface Rick final question to you.

I like the Bill Cassie Titan. I can't speak for them yet who they been wavering a little more because this what they thought was a strong presentation announcing that the presentation they saw was was really manipulated that change a lot of minds. Even the Republican side. Look, I think this is all over. Let's move on that weapon. I yeah it is over the present will be acquitted and vindicated, will talk that with that with you on Monday for decades ACLJ has been on the frontlines of protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ