Sally Yates to Senate Judiciary: James Comey Went Rogue

Breaking news today on Jay Sekulow live Sally Gates to the Senate Judiciary Committee, says Jim Koning went live from Washington DC authorized that the White House tell them about the problem is, the more immediate issue. Phone lines are open for your questions right now. Call 1-800-684-3110 about the interview got upset trying to come he didn't coordinate that.

Call me go, your host Jordan Jay Sekulow Liber the second hearing suited for sure committee has ducted into crossfire hurricane and potential wrongdoing. There's also US attorney looking at the Russia Russia gate. There's a US attorney looking at unmasking separately from that of Mike Flynn.

The first hearing.

It was Rod Rosenstein.

Now Sally Gates is appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Sen. Lindsey Graham and she's under questioning about because remember she was in that Oval Office meeting on January 5, 2017 with Pres. Obama and VP Biden. Other key officials discuss at like call me and then not you had John Brennan, their Dir. Daschle tells Jim Klapper national security advisor Susan Rice and she was the person of the meeting who supposedly said she had no idea what the meeting was about. So she's been asked about that she's been asked about Jim Comey sending in the FBI agents and here's what she had to say about Jim Comey unilaterally deciding to bypass the White House counsel's office bypass her and just send into FBI agents the White House to interview Mike Flynn take a listen, you didn't authorize the interview this matter fact you wanted to go to the White House and tell them about the problem. Did you shoot and when he glanced when you heard about the interview you got upset that you sent contractor coming to court lasted Comey go rogue term.

Yes. So there you have the acting Atty. Gen.Deputy Attorney General Sally H. Saying that, in fact, James Comey went rogue in the way he handled the sale set up of this interview and this is just by the just so you know this is just the beginning just the beginning of our testimony and there's a lot of other admissions, including this is about Pfizer warrants and Pfizer abuse. So I think we gotta be clear here. What we have at the outset of this achy admission. What is that kid mission that he went rogue. He went rogue then you find out that they did not file protocols and she makes a statement saying something like, that's an understatement.

We have that one up yet we have that one will will have that next for the next segment, but that tells you you told of what's happening here what's been uncovered and Sally Gates is no fan a President from cases of someone who became acting Atty. Gen. for Pres. trumpet then refused to enforce the travel ban was Supreme Court held his constitutional and I was fired over that so she's no fan choose Obama administration holdover, but she again what we hear time and time again. Dad, I think that's very clear is that Jim Comey was the ringleader of the wrongdoing at the FBI and he had his fellow I guess his fellow clowns Andrew McKay Peter Schrock and Lisa page come along with him in the wrongdoing and they were they were in. They were telling these DOJ not even informing DOJ officials about what they were doing. I think that's exactly right at me when you talk about going road and violating protocol understand what they were dealing with here, the President of the United States and his administration were talking about. This is not some insignificant procedural error says huge consequences and set the framework for whatever becoming a investigation with problems from beginning River will take your phone calls at 1-800-684-3110 at 2064th 3110 monitoring the hearing as it continues as well is a lot more from Mitzi continues. As always, go to ACLJ.org find out more about all the work you were doing the cases were doing across the country. That's ACLJ.org if you want your Facebook compares to share this broadcast with your friends and family click that share button as we analyze Sally Gates testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the American Center for Law and were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad. Whether it's defending religious freedom.

Protecting those for their faith.

Uncovering corruption in the Washington bureaucracy and fighting to protect life in the courts and in Congress ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that. We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge every dollar you donate $10 gift dollar gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ.

The work we simply would not occur without your generous take part in our matching challenge to make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms gift today online LJ only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists.

The ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later, planned parenthood's role in the what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question for copy mission life today online/secular live in the studio with Jay Sekulow joining us.

So as any kind before a US attorney. I still was both the defense work and prosecute the works of understands and is from Georgia so is familiar with Sally Gates to say the least. So dead, I think you know interest it we've Artie played affected. Sally Gates is said Jim Comey was wrote OKC is a rogue FBI director and I think that both sides now if they're being honest, would agree with that. Certainly Hillary Clinton believes that it agrees with that and we thought that was wrong him kept going back and forth about every clinically) leading up to the election so you have that statement you have you got more again from court into this when bite 57 with this is Sen. John Cornyn to Sally Gates testifying today. Take a listen to the direct supervisor of the FBI director if you didn't consult with you or tell you what he was doing or you didn't respond to your inquiries about it would not strike you as highly unusual, not ideal. Well, that's quite an understatement. Okay will agree on that. This is a joke there, but the truth of the matter was Andy, the lack of coordination that the FBI agent went around the Department of Justice interviewing general plan and in the procedures that they implemented and Sally Gates says an understatement. She acknowledges that her not ideal as an understatement. This shows you the systematic failures that was happening under her watch Deputy Attorney General is a direct supervisor of the director of the federal Bureau of investigation and that is only she called in a row. She called Little Rock on national before the Judiciary Committee on national television and she then tries to a little underplay that imply cute with Sen. Cornyn by thing will that that's and not the proper protocol or that is not the official way of doing things instead of think that is wrong, he could have gone to meet before he went to the wideout interview claimants donations over there playing cute and bad.

But again, we gotta remember Sally Gates is a committed Obama. I she's a Democrat not to play straight with any Republican that you can possibly respond to janitor Sen. Hawley really related Lynn into her significantly, even to the point where a rebuke from Sen. Feinstein.

He did raise questions, but all of them were illegitimate questions from someone who is a committed Democrat we know are in Georgia. We know how to play fast and loose with court. We talk a lot about the phis abuse. Let me say something here phis unmasking I'm holding my hand the quarterly. This is just the quarterly report watching on TV or Facebook or any of our social media platforms.

This is one quarters here it is, appear on radio which most of you are most it's gonna be hundred pages, maybe more than that and it's our quarterly report. By the way, if you remember the ACLJ along Justice Council you get these and they're good to have their very important gives a lot of information.

One of the information pieces we got was all of the unmasking that was going on, leading to phis awards and the false phis awards.

Listen to this question from Sen. Graham the Sally Gates number 31. The court rebuke the Department of Justice and FBI regarding the core Carter page 1 application just as they fail that duty now rewrite their identity is huge that she just admitted undergrowth before the Senate Judiciary Committee that the FBI did not fulfill their duty of candor. This is getting to where Sen. Graham said that it Artie appears at the FBI lied to the Pfizer court by the Department of Justice now weathered the DOJ attorneys making application or not.

That was just over the fact that the source of the dossier wasn't Russia base was actually at Brookings Institute in Washington DC. Yet now he's easy. We teased. There was also he could prove this week that they lied to Congress, which would be a second criminal chart. I think that's where he's going with this line of question right now, I think so too. In any it shows the irregularity that was taking place both within the interview process of general Flint but also within the far up Pfizer surveillance application in the process that was not followed through their feelings that the question several times from the Republican senator did you read this application you look at it you get it past the constitutional and statutory and factual monster that it should to go to Pfizer court and she finally grudgingly admitted that he was responsible forward and know it did not in the general oral with the Inspector General is correct in his seven or 17 findings of irregularity and if so what we've got is a under the Obama administration and Sally Gates acting as the Deputy Attorney General United States not being candid in one Sen. Graham said you understand this is a rebuke. She refused to say that if you finally grudgingly admitted know this is not the proper figure no. Of course it's not the proper procedure and yes that was a rebuke the Pfizer court that she entered active, the government acted antithetical to the candor that it should have recognized for the court and it did not do it properly. Also put in the printed Pfizer court put a new set new application procedures are to be made. They were concerned about trusting the Department of Justice on any of these any further longer and it raised a whole host of issues now listen to. Here's another when talking about on the Pfizer issue a listen number 53. You told me you did review them in their entirety. Okay some boilerplate certainly reviewed all of the actual information, factual information in the phis was wrong and maybe make a boilerplate review. This time was under penalty of perjury. She also testified to the Inspector General that she could not recall reviewing those phis applications. I don't we have that we get let's get will get that one and Andy. She did in fact eat before the Senate committee say that she did review it. You may not read the boilerplate but you review the factual allegations will likely that that is Sen. Grassley. I reviewed it and remember to sign an amendment to it. She had a greater responsibility when you're buying an American citizen got that exactly what the event the court to do a look at every single word in that application and if you got any questions about it to follow up on it and to ask about it and to find out the details about it.

She failed to live nobly and that responsibility and she grudgingly grudgingly admitted that they that you failed to do what her duty of Deputy Attorney General laws to cause money hundred 64 3110 resume a lot of words being thrown around here terms being thrown around here that have importance and meaning. Robert called in for Marilyn on line.

What if you want to talk to us on the air or live 1-800-684-3110 give us a call.

Now Robert welcome to Jay Sekulow live yeah hi Jordan I just wanted to ask both of you in light of the testimony from Sally Gates of the particular Sen. committee James Kobe Bryant will work more pacifically.

Does she mean by electrically happy hijinks coldly went low cloaking with specific ways and if you found definitely. Indeed, he went low. What would be the penalty to James Kobe.

In addition to Sally extension of the acting Deputy Attorney General of the Department of Justice. Interesting Robert to even look at you. What is wrong really mean what they mean when they use a termite road and the simple definition of road. Is it dishonest or unprincipled man, so that's what she called. Jim told me today dishonest man dishonest is an FBI director could lead to criminal charges that can lead to real serious violations.

Now, it ultimately led to his termination, which, of course, the Democrats were up in arms about. Now they've got their own Democrat Deputy AG, former acting AG Sally Gates, it was again no fan a Pres. Trump calling Jim Comey exactly the kind of term of the reason why you would fire person right. He was wrong. He was in unprincipled, bad, dishonest person.

That's the definition in basic dictionary.com okay so Jordan said something really important here and you know I want us to focus on this. That's really important. You got the Deputy Attorney General, the Ice Age, limiting the acting Atty. Gen. United States for about 10 days saying that the FBI director went rogue. Now there was a whole aspect of the molar report about whether Comey should be fired. Another could be part that in and of itself. The way in which the Flynn matter was handled.

The course buys a later but the Flynn matter was handled not to procedure going road not telling the FBI not telling the department which is not telling the department of justice when you got the Deputy Attorney General acting Atty. Gen. yards facing the FBI director is wrong. You know what you do fire up.

Do exactly that and lay in the day, they waited and waited and waited and it was only through the got that Pres. Trump had fired him at the request of the Atty. Gen. and Rod Rosenstein supporting that rope was ultimately permitted find important office folks ready to take your phone calls we come back one 864 3110. We continue to monitor the hearing as well will have more sound from that analysis from that of my for report as well that if you watch a Facebook compares the can show you this is just for the winter and spring. It includes a foyer that led to the unmasking when we had spent a week and 1/2 ago. Go to ACLJ.org will be right back only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, planned parenthood's role in the what Obama care means to discover many ways your membership is empowering the right question free copy of mission in life today online/the American Center for Law and Justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad.

Whether it's defending religious freedom.

Protecting those faith covering corruption in Washington fighting to protect life in the courts and in Congress. ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that. We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge every dollar you donate $10 gift gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ. The work we simply would not occur without your generous take part in our matching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms online.

Okay Jay Sekulow like this Jordan secular.

We are covering the hearing ongoing right now – it's it's being covered on C-SPAN and I know you could see it some other places. Sometimes foxes cutting into it, but we are covering it for you on this broadcast as it continues. This is the second hearing. The Senate Judiciary Committee has held looking into the potential wrongdoing in the rush investigation and the origins of the rush investigation and this one specifically looking at what was going on with the phis applications Carter page and the actions to send in FBI agents to interview Mike Flynn going around the normal process where Sally Gates called that road again calling Jim Comey Road mean she was calling him a dishonest or unprincipled man, someone they want to fire if they were FBI director right and probably their deputies to people he chose the deputies because unprincipled dishonest people probably hire unprincipled and dishonest people to surround them like Andy McCabe, Peter Schrock and Lisa page and DOJ attorneys that alter emails or to go before Pfizer courts. That's the dishonest kind of people that get surrounded by that you surround yourself by when you yourself are being called road by someone who was basically on your side politically. It doesn't like this present either. What were start to see that I do this is coming when you got a real criminal investigation onto three fries herself right and and so she decided pretty honest she's pretty pretty honest and heard her prayer, her person to point to is probably Kobe: yes, she's making clearly Comey is now in her crosshairs as the guilty party so to speak. Now it's interesting, I want to play two soundbites any complicity for any commonalities let's first this is an exchange between Sen. Graham. Again, this is on the phis applications Sen. Graham and Sally S. Number 32, knowing then what you know now, would you sign that application never signed any document because that document was a fraud that a fair statement if you knew then what you know now you wouldn't signed anything that contain errors or niche. When did that contain errors and omissions never knowingly signed document 27 years. I believe you didn't know.

I believe you didn't know that what you sign was wrong. The question is if you had known you would sign it is accurate and correct information. Okay, now she said to the Inspector General that she not recall reading it phis work, take a listen to this exchange center Holly told the Inspector General that you had no recollection actually of of reviewing renewal application number one is that is your testimony today different specific list, but shortly. So in the two countries statement me. Nice try but strike out or strike, that's for sure. That doesn't cut it. Graham for question four times he had to go back to work after. Would you have signed it if you had known it contained false information on the fourth try finally said no I would not have signed it under those circumstances, so I can't disingenuous slippery slope Sally gay slippery Sally. That's what I'm going to call her and now finally after having been question four times by Sen. Graham on that simple point she could advance of the first time.

No I would not have signed it finally concedes to it and this is a concern dedicated Obama administration high official second ranking in the Justice Department failed to in the responsibility that she had the slides back in detail that application for surveillance of an American citizen, let me play the following questionnaire, Jordan's comments on this is a follow-up from Holly use of the specific recollection of reviewing renewal application number one, but today you say you did, that's great.

If you did, because I'd like to ask you some more detail questions. I just want to get clear on this testimony. Yes, interesting. Yeah so what you have there. Jordan she's she tells the Inspector General one thing no specific recollection right now is you being cross-examined on its contents.

Remember everything he had.

She she said you know I didn't really remember this in, but I'm the identity that we been the Oval Office. Sometimes there are a lot of people in the Oval Office, in this case means but I will tell you this. If there's a meeting going on and it's the present United States. The vice President national security advisor, the director of national intelligence, the FBI director in the Deputy Attorney General and Peter Schrock, you would remember you would remember you would recall if they who was there because that was a serious meeting, especially because she got upset that she was kind of kept out of the loop. She looked like she did know was going on in front of the presence she was mad at Comey for not briefing her about what was being discussed because she looked like she was, not informed.

At least that's what she's saying but but again it's it's it's interesting how quickly they are reminded when you know these Peter Strock notes come out. It says DAG was there yet so I could goes back to I don't DAG mean the Deputy Attorney General so Andy you got the yet Sally ate saying that Comey went rogue. The present eventually fires Comey week. This is just a procedural aspects were talking about now that you get into the substantive and the substantive is the false statements in the phis award. That's a substantive violation of law get around that I can't get around the fact that you went there – supposedly relative signed off on it went to a fine record of federal intelligence surveillance Court okay to get a warrant to spy on an American citizen and she handles it in such a cavalier fashion, maybe out didn't read the boilerplate. What are you talking about your talking about spine. You read every letter from the first on that page of the last of that page and if you've got any questions about it which you should've had because all of that, you'll stop was in there you send it back and you say what this what this what this I don't understand that I'm not put my name to this before federal cult court.

She didn't do that. She failed us and that she failed her administration and she failed her government think that's right.

There's a new drum looking at this as you're involved in the stuff just beginning. Some try to put some historical context on this. I said this during the molar probe that the irregularities in that investigation, which are now legendary are breathtaking and then when you get the inside story of what is actually happening here. I think it's even worse. Yes, I think it gets worse and worse and worse because you realize just how high level high level. This coordinated campaign to take down an incoming President was so they were doing everything they could, they know they lost the election and they lost the election they wanted to use the second option, the insurance plan and now we know that people like Obama and Biden were involved in trying to help carry out the insurance plan in their final days of office. Remember, it was again the same day that Sally ate zest at that meeting in the Oval Office.

January 5 as Obama's Chief of Staff.

This McDonagh unmasked Michael Flynn put in the request last unmasking request made by the Obama administration that we know overly that was declassified by the DNI record now from Joe Biden. This was the top level coordinating dating the takedown of the incoming President for the matching challenge campaign here for the month of August we rate July your support of the ACLJ makes a huge difference you enjoy this broadcast your support of the ACLJ keeps us coming to you on TV on Facebook and radio stations ACLJ.org matching challenge ACLJ.org back with more of the American Center for Law and Justice were encased in critical issues at home and abroad for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ matching challenge for every dollar you donate, it will be now $10 gift becomes $20, $50 gift becomes 100 could make a difference in the work we do. Protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms to you and your family. Give a gift today online LJ live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow when you heard about the interview got upset coming to court last Comey go and now your post is very, actually hear the question we are covered right now. Sally aids for her half order for racial present acting Atty. Gen. really Deputy Attorney General of the United States, and she was a holdover temporarily from the Obama administration in the trump administration ultimately fired over her refusal to enact the presence, travel ban, which the Supreme Court held to be constitutional so she was wrong about that being unconstitutional.

But today she's being questioned about you. What she did and didn't know about the Flynn matter and that the rush investigation and the phis awards and you know we put together to allow this dad in the Scriptures ask and I think this is itching because we got a face for this carbon set from Sydney on Facebook and scope is coming up so much again today and and she says I like him and his opinion as well to you think of Sally Gates is throwing Kobe under the bus to protect yourself by delivering good new equipment and I'll let any casino.

He knows Sally is Bob a lot better than I do like.

I think with Sally ate strategy here is is to deflect. I don't think she's not telling the truth. From what I gather. I think she's deflecting it to Comey because coming was the primary actor here and I agree with you totally only one there director of the FBI and Comey of course knows everything there's nothing he doesn't know he is St. James Comey the pious, but divine in the omniscient, and he decided to spend a couple of FBI tried to to corral Michael Flynn to try to get them to live. He will disclose that to his ball. Sally ate himself. She finds out about it goes not offended by two cents today. Months later she calls him a row and undisciplined person. Now that carries consequences. In short, I don't think she's lying about that because it was a personal affront to hurt my deputy my subordinate not telling me anything and doing it on his own. I would be mad I would be mad as hell to use a lens at Graham expression, let me say this, you mention the fact that we have meetings at the Oval Office people there don't forget the ones that are memorable. This meeting had meetings, and sometimes there's a lot of people cometh like a couple minutes.

That's one thing real meaning that you remember they had a real meeting and and Sen. Graham asked about this real meaning. Let's play this video, audio and video for number 34 talk about that January 5 meeting was the vice President there okay. Did he mention the Logan act so you don't remember him mentioning the Logan act did anybody mention the Logan act memory director coming director Comey mixing the Logan act is unconstitutional on its face, it has never been successfully used for prosecution ever known concerning unless hundred 25 years of 1789 thinking about that ever been utilized. Comey and Biden did not yet, but instructs notes.

He said by did that by brought brought it up so that she might not remember the Biden brought it up, but she member she's I confused about this whole thing supposedly free believer about what she's even like listening to. She doesn't understand so she does acknowledge the Logan act was brought up at least by Comey and in the in the notes that that would be a trust that would be there attempt to justify even continuing to investigate Flynn. Maybe he violated some law that's from 1789.

It's never been utilized in court ever and everyone believes is unconstitutional but is not been taken off the books because it's never been utilized and it's about an American talk to a foreigner and and is an illegal because they could be like representing the fort. The US government visited time here for 79 every kid at the Sen. Graham said it every US Sen. would be violating the Logan act because they talk to for any all of us would be so they use. That is the basis just to go row and send it to FBI agents to continue and really launched in the next stage of their investigation. Crossfire razor crossfire hurricane to after Pres. trump directly get a special counsel pointed said will be right back on Jason, the American Center for Law and just as were encased in critical issues at home and abroad. Whether it's defending religious freedom. Protecting those for their faith. Uncovering corruption in the Washington bureaucracy fighting to protect life and the court said in Congress. ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that. We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way limited time you can participate in the ACLJ matching challenge every dollar you donate $10 gift $50 gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ work. We simply would not occur without your generous heart wrenching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms gift today online LJ only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally Tatian includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later Planned Parenthood. What Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is is empowering the right question mission life today online/Jay Sekulow like this Jordan Sankyo is 62 to set the weirded to to take your phone calls at 1-800-684-3110 but to the Flynn matter. Specifically, you know what it was like you but we would exactly did you think that they were investigating when he finally found out about the investigation. So now you know about it Sally eights, what did you think there investigating image is back in force, never very never clear. The first answer that usually these hearings. But even the second or third. It usually takes like question that question for to get her to finally say what she believes take a listen. This is by 50 make sure I understand this. The interviewer general plan where you investigating a policy difference between the trump administration and the Obama administration policy. We were investigating a crime where you are intelligence to okay is it a counterintelligence investigation based on the policy difference counterintelligence based on the rational, systematic, I know this is very important.

Your before Flynn was. He was undercutting Obama policy is that what you're worried about my undercutting policy and so this is her this is your approach to justify to try to justify this policy difference that he was covering it up.

He wasn't covering up the undercutting Obama policy this the incoming freshman industry administration publicly stated that he disagreed with the Obama policy doesn't yes but there's another aspect of this policy difference and he cannot be the basis upon which a criminal action begins in the FBI agents at interview Flynn said they did not see any intent to mislead like stumbling all over again in protecting the Obama strike policy decision, and any policy decision that does not comply with what Obama policy was going to be made somehow provide them a crime. They were determined to make it a crime to violate what the leader of the community organizing policy was they were determined to make it a crime to love engagement was going to do it.

It certainly was, it was going to do it only try to get it done by the notes of the FBI agent show that he sent them in there to get in the line to get him fired.

Okay, that was a determination. This man is a threat to Obama's policies were going to get that.

That's the plain truth of it and that was the intention, and that's why Bill barked correctly. After all is said and done that were not prosecuting plant is over with. It was a bad prosecution to begin with, and I'm not losing Colorado on line 1 Louis Jay Sekulow live your on the air. Yeah, I want to ask Ron wasn't at the same excuse. Rosenstein gave even read the whole warrant before you signed off on it yeah lets the sounds Rosenstein and it will play the sound from Yates to say she didn't read it either as a boilerplate. So here's what Rosenstein said about the fights were take a listen. We aware that the application mischaracterized Christopher Steele's past work with the FBI as a confidential human source and failed to include information from a source question is reliability. No, I was not aware if you would known about these errors and omissions as of June 29, 2017. Would you have signed off on know when on Sen. my understanding is that these five applications follow a felony, very rigorous process and and that they were accurate that there were verify the whole principle of having a consignment under oath is that you can rely on the facts.

Okay, so he tells you that you know was just kind of routine, then Sally eights. Yeah, it's asked the same kind of questions you told me you did review them in their entirety.

Okay boilerplate certainly reviewed all of the actual information which was run by the way, but this cavalier attitude about not you got it from getting a foreign intelligence surveillance warrant on an American citizen read the whole think that the key. These are not the normal flies as they come across there – these are Pfizer words on American citizen Leslie affiliate with the campaign. Yes of the is a high priority for the Dag's the Deputy Attorney General to handle this and make the final approvals on putting these words would sign off on and so that's the kind of Pfizer words, you do need to go through with a more fine tooth comb and that neither one of them Rosenstein or Yates tried to say they did in fact they said they had a look through it, but lot of its boilerplate and that was that they signed off on it because by the time he got to their desk. Five. Whatever you but you know Andy, this goes to the point of where the Pfizer court said you can't do that to us again that this was on the court exactly right and radical. The provision under would provide the court operated and they said that I have never seen a court on its own motion throughout on day as we say in the law on its own, castigated the Department of Justice for bringing that kind of a document before it, but if you remember the chief judge of the court said you have violated all your dental procedures you brought us a piece of garbage year were never going to trust you again. I think that's a pretty damning statement.

Pfizer court judge to make up court to make on it all. I don't know I think it's Outlook Sally, it's clear to me that Sally eights knew exactly what was going on here and we also remember that they had made police reports indicate that they had made a couple of attempts to try to get the Pfizer warrants and were not successful least initial right so this was a part of an ongoing investigation that she is responsible for yeah and the reason why they kept getting denied supposedly is because there was just not enough there.

There for a Jeff Pfizer court judge to issue the warrant which is so rare. I mean, these are rubberstamps usually so that's what we believe that again Pfizer court secret. They started bringing in more of the dossier that in the dossier, which we now know is been completely discredited and to the point now that the descriptor now is discredited at their there may have been criminal activity because of the sourcing the main source for Michael steel was not Russia based as the FBI and DOJ presented to the Pfizer court which would be a crime.

They were based in Washington DC at the Brookings Institute and so that was allied to the Pfizer court. That's a crime. Sen. Lindsey Graham chairman Judiciary committees also said he lied to Congress about that that the primary source for steel was Russia based in fact they were DC think tank based, so that's a lie and a crime. So to acts of criminal activity. Just within these Pfizer applications that were already having trouble getting approved.

So dad it's like they've got it.

It's like they were just they they try to do anything possible to try to get it through. So they went to even information. They knew to be suspect. They knew the Christopher Steele course because he'd Artie been fired by David and Ed they had stopped working with him as a source, then actually fired for leaking information to the address also really and then but she still had this bad. There's this whole thing and I hope it will play in the next segment.

This discussion about brute force involvement and Bruce were still being that we have that will play next segment and what's interesting about this whole thing is a bruise or solicit the department just as he was the go-between between Christopher Steele and the FBI in all of this is going on Andy while they know the information being provided is questionable at best and false at worst. He wonder why or Philip the Department of Justice world and his wife working GPS. The relationship among these people and yet it's not been exposed and it's not been put out until we make it happen segment.

Committee having hearings on it and finally it comes out. He even admits that Russo is still there.

Why is he still there.

I'd like to know I like defendant asked that question because he was part and parcel of the entire operation. I suspect this is just a suspicion I have Jordan I got. I suspect that weird that these hearings are going to get to the bottom of a lot of this coupled with what is being done by Dr. Guy.

I do try music series of serious, the people are taking them seriously. Their there are very real.

I did the questions are ever getting a lot more from it were learning a lot more about who was had a lead taking the lead who was uninformed and who was uninformed support where they were willing to under oath, because someone wrote you, Sally eights say that an aunt who was them all saying that they didn't read these Pfizer's really that they knew it was boilerplate kind of stuff even though it involved American citizens. So Pfizer were on American and an American ended on a Presidential campaign. So all of those impacts. She's got this going on Durham and then the US attorney in Texas looking at just the potential crimes committed because of all the unmasking request in the leaking out of the information from the debt that was received after the unmasking request. She put all that together. Finally, all of the pieces to this giant puzzle and is a huge puzzle that are coming together, but it is what we have to keep going through.

Keep reminding ourselves had talked about this Sean Hannity yesterday duties broadcast every day we talk about this to keep this all your head. Is it possible you got to sometimes go through the notes go through all the dates go through all the lines and that's were good for you every day. Jay Sekulow live we talked about this issue is so that you remember all the pieces that fit together will be right back only one. A society can agree most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn cold like it will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, planned parenthood's role in what Obama care means many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online/American Center for Law and justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad. Whether it's defending religious freedom. Protecting those faith covering corruption in Washington fighting to protect life reports and in Congress. ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that.

We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge every dollar you donate $10 gift gift becomes 100.

This is a critical time for the ACLJ. The work we simply would not occur without your generous take part in our matching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms online. Okay Jay Sekulow like this. Jordan said he also got to cruises we got is questioning as well and that we don't have it yet but that with the were questions that Bruce were question.

I think this is important okay so because this is Andy made the point Jordan yesterday to resort who was in the middle of all this was whiteboard perfusion GPS is still employed at the Department of Justice, yet still he still is likely lost like one of his top top roles kind of demoted but I mean I don't get like effective salary. All that the motion is no longer like the head of department with the Department of Justice but that what I think is important is that that when it comes to resort.

There's got to be something there because of that we were working with Christian still in member they both testify behind closed doors under oath, so I just wonder if Bruce or is is one of their top sources you he's just he's cooperating with the investigation. Babies are given immunity because because it is bizarre that he still there unless he is there is been given immunity as their top source to provide as much info as he can increase for steel because his wife was working with Chris clearly, but he only reason I can think of him still being there, but any. This is not yet. I but it is so odd Andy that he is still there. Get over that the man who was implicated deeply in all this activity, and yet why why is he a protected species.

Why is he still allowed to parade around the Justice Department is a high-ranking official considering the role that he played in basically trying to undermine the new President's administration and participating with all those people who are all wrong in my opinion. I can understand that.

Why is he being protected. What is it about him that no one will call out what is going on. I think we need to be asking some serious questions about this guy Bruce or was asking. I think this was by Sen. Kennedy, Sally eights about the background of the flies warrants itself. It was junk before you signed off on the vice application sets forth the factual basis and we check check.

Sure, sure I would do it. I will bring the issue up sign off on the Pfizer work on a Presidential campaign filling with a Presidential campaign, and I think I bring those FBI agents into them so you sure you're right about this. This is a big deal. I have had water in it that I have applied for records okay and I have bad agents of the evening. The Georgia Bureau of investigation and they have given me an affidavit. I have read the affidavit, but in every instance, I brought that agent in and had him or before me and go through it line by line order to get this word you get this. Where did you get that where did you get the how did you verify this information. I know I know that this is the case I want to know about this and that, because any time you do a wire interceptor, a wiretap in this case an application to surveilling American citizen, you better do more than just personally reading Hewitt as she says you going you interrogate that I took was it just too much trouble for go down the street and asked the question, bring the agent and asked the question. I think it's reprehensible. This is whence what Sally eights is actually telling Congress was hurt so many times from these at the zip top officials of the US government that we all pay the highest highest you can get and time and time again dereliction of duty dereliction of duty didn't do their job didn't really work didn't work so hard didn't care work doing the people's business during the Java government and that's the truth here's the thing. Listen that this is the point of that point coming.

This is like 66.

I think this was a sinner. Holly and Bruce for we also know that your deputy Bruce or knew that steel was working for the Democrats and the same deputy Bruce or your deputy while he was working for you was actively facilitating contacts between the FBI and and a steel and also between the State Department and steel. How did this happen on your watch is it.

Is it normal for you to permit your deputies to facilitate contacts between political parties and the FBI and the State Department is that routine behavior in general resource, so the Deputy Attorney General who sent direct direct report is Bruce for is unaware of Bruce or's actual. Maybe she should a bathroom floor before she signed off on the Pfizer waterjet that Scripture could not face this is somebody report regular never knew anything about his wife being a working working for a AAA intelligence gathering, a private firm that was cut interesting to capacity conflict for brainstorming do nothing. It's what were these people doing they were doing the bidding of the Obama ministration even that's all they did so fit if it would hurt Trump that go along with it now. Will they throw Kobe under the bus sure you know what Sally eights today.

She even pulled another stunt she knows how to use you.

She knows how to use better tech to use the regular is like if you did it to your iPhone without even putting you that the ear for earphone headphones. It you need air pods just just put in plug-in here for ear earphones speaker and should be clear. You don't she decide to do today computer just put on the microphone get all the background noise at all of the all the acoustics are horrible so that everything she says is mumbled here. The first part so it's hard for us in the media and the media, and for the senators who were there. The same way to even understand what you say so, Sally eights, shame on you for that.

That stunt like we all can figure out a 10-year-old can figure out a baby five euro Supreme Court arguments to get those the audio right yes.

Look at what we went through during that the stay-at-home order where we Broadcasted you every single day and we had clear audio from subs. I was at my daughter's bedroom broadcasting life during that that that what was the stay-at-home order nationally and it was clear it was a perfect but was it clear absolutely. I think she decided to make pull start on the entire country today and the American people and the U.S. Senate by using audio like that you know it's interesting her stunt ends up being making. Once again James call me Andy be the protagonist is the valuable player playing a very cool back back PBX with his piety is a know it all.

The public of the new book got Artie got a book coming out so you know the road is now just ruling the room and Sally gate Jordan points out, the, the lack of technology that she use where you can't hardly guarantee mumbled and jumbled sitting at her nice office thinking in solving in Atlanta where she got a cushy job because he was the Deputy Attorney General.

Very nice, but slippery Sally one that you pay the price for the broadcasts. They let me say this gives you the particulars. We are into week one of our August matching challenge.

It's not apathetic. Your support of the ACLJ makes a huge difference in the amount you donate a matching grant for that's how this broadcast gets to you every single day, five days a week live on TV live on radio stations across the country on satellite radio on Facebook periscope.

Your support of the ACLJ makes it used to.

Just to get this analysis out every day and also for the 1500+ families) to assist because the school reopening problem plants donates the ACLJ.org W the American Center for Law and Justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ matching challenge every dollar you donate will be matched $10 gift becomes $20, $50 gift becomes 100 could make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms to you and your family.

Give a gift today online LJ