Share This Episode
Brian Kilmeade Show Brian Kilmeade Logo

Producers' Pick | Shannon Bream: Fox News Chief Legal Correspondent on Overturning of Roe v. Wade

Brian Kilmeade Show / Brian Kilmeade
The Cross Radio
June 25, 2022 12:00 am

Producers' Pick | Shannon Bream: Fox News Chief Legal Correspondent on Overturning of Roe v. Wade

Brian Kilmeade Show / Brian Kilmeade

On-Demand Podcasts NEW!

This broadcaster has 872 podcast archives available on-demand.

Broadcaster's Links

Keep up-to-date with this broadcaster on social media and their website.


June 25, 2022 12:00 am

Fox News Chief Legal Correspondent Shannon Bream reacts in real time to the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and what the implications are.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  • -->
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Cross the Bridge
David McGee
The Charlie Kirk Show
Charlie Kirk
Core Christianity
Adriel Sanchez and Bill Maier
The Line of Fire
Dr. Michael Brown
The Charlie Kirk Show
Charlie Kirk

Is three hours and you generally agree coverage of broken sitting there outside ready to go do some incident analysis, Fox News's chief legal analyst. Also I grew up Fox news at night you sear over the channel.

Best-selling author Shannon, thanks for joining us. Well, first off, put in perspective well with this day means for the country and I just had Alan Dershowitz on projecting a summer of rage what you have a proportion grip like that don't have a joint faith is a call for quote open secret chat room somewhere on their website it openly out anything actually enjoy caring happy to pack into calling for things that are naïvely cleaned out at graffiti. Tell your current provider breaks up with her calling and I think that there's a lot of frustration and it is about much of the Western COBIT what people are feeling isolated and frustrated economy people are really on edge and I think the left is very upset about a lot of other Supreme Court so I I think that urging caution and our authorities have done in light of the threats that are openly narrated. We see the decibels is beside herself with anger is not a good day.

The 63 decision, one of the things you appointed us to incidence those judged Jonathan Turley, is John Roberts as Chief Justice. He rolled up his own opinion, and essentially not. It's we voted with the majority but is not so much with the majority maybe govern perspective on the lines is the court opinion in the dissent display is a relentless is relentless freedom from doubt on the legal issue that I cannot hire. I am not sure. For example, that a ban on determining pregnancy from the moment of conception must be treated the same under the Constitution is a ban after 15 weeks, so he is openly thinking about this speculating this and letting us know his mindset 1. How rare is that and how powerless was C. In this book came together it really (no other option you anything to serve their legal position I could get either the bill go after that there were about to uphold. The question was always whether or not to go after well if she wants to have narrow opinion) narrowly tailored solution. He'd only been about that go all the way there, when the court your case. Call question presented back to the only thing to keep it about empty think that it was the question will pre-viability abortion unconstitutional heat that can get the 50 question the court for going all the way to really keep the file. The case necessitated what he thinks was an overreach on the original question is also member the score once counseled this difficulty of the question monitors us to observe the wise limitations on her functioning to confine ourselves to deciding only what is necessary to the disposition of the meeting case I would decide the question we granted granted review to answer whether previous recognized abortion rights bars all abortion restrictions prior to viability, such as a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancies.

Is this unlawful the answer to that question is no. There's no need to go further than to decide the case. So he would've what is he saying there around where she got should be going to collect about the right decision by not numbered here.

There were five cool ready to go there together under an internal and external pressure and no place to go but I felt so shut up Bremer just Shannon, what about people that are saying and tweeting that now. Next is to be contraception. Next is going to be good by same-sex marriage didn't judge, Justice Alito address this talk about all of the English is that they are not talking about and so very clearly like you want to ignore it yelling there today and they're ignoring it very clear that this is not about that court politically think that's a laugh to think that exactly what this is about and to think about boxing fundraising and a rally cry will show it should be a good term for the GOP election all still of course to make hay about the second exaggerated represents some of what is and not right that she just said that again. It's a closing just a short time ago. So on the greater story of going 63 concealing cads to prevent people from carrying a gun in New York City is unconstitutional. The impact of that.

I know it's going to affect directly seven states put in there is a two pager from Cavanaugh same tell me the places you don't want to be able to bring a gun, tell me the limitation tell me the restrictions like for example, state capital, a court room. Let's say a a school, a subway, so where does this go from here. Jurisdiction thing is no small amount of really concentrated like 1/4 of the US population changed a lot when he did know if you're going to get a permit or carry out current etiquette filter equipment. For example, in New York course predicate came from subjective criteria like based on what we did something like okay everybody, subject to a background check. Everybody at this age limit apartment. Whatever it is, it can't be objective, not subject itself. The next state cannot license and permit required of things for God and the only people impacted by the people are trying to do this in a lawful way they want to be law-abiding gun owners. There were folks who want to work on controlling less guns on the streets. They were each bit is more concealed carry permits are out there on the street but probably would be true, but it should also meet people who been fully vetted their babies and training requirements depend on the state. If you got a free-for-all that does not just mean everybody can carry a gun anywhere, anytime. Still can be very tightly controlled your subscriber list of Maoist foxes are just start your projects, foxes, a legal expert, Shannon bream is with us fortuitous to have you on the calendar before this decision came down to came down about 90 minutes ago Roe V Wade has been overturned 24 hours ago.

We learned about this gun laws 63 always go with with Clarence Thomas right in the opinion now were going to see you for the present United States and 45 minutes address the country. What are his.

Besides expressing outrage and going against what he said in the 1970s when he was looking to overturn Roe V Wade, besides saying that you know he's gonna be outraged by what you think you can do executive Willie wool. He urged his party to do what they're going to like about finding that they will allow you abortion, reproductive find that you can't hear what's available and eight you are abortion clinic dates so that we can make sure they get here you go into the corners you have places like Colorado where there's really felt about abortion up until your due date now in response what they thought they get to the court today state that literally today, abortion becomes illegal in almost all cases because they had a trigger lot on the federal level. Not really sure that that offer it probably went after this opinion, and that nowadays my abortion banshee knows better.

She's smarter than anything in California have you don't increase it. People travel there because there have more abortion freedom in her state Senate what you and Nancy Pelosi just said in their attempt to destroy it is charging ahead with their to say the lies health freedom in the Congress be aware of this are plotting a nationwide combat. They cannot be allowed to have tardy in the Congress to do that, but that's our goal. So already plotting to try to keep the speakership of the political go on here will be fundraising characterization on people need to be honestly informed about what is needed where you live, and are still dangling residents a different date going to abortion clinics where it's legal meltdown that if you can travel the quick and well built in a difficult place enough. I think not only only paper thing will be fun to help you travel the Fed may try to do a number of employers are. Thank you the benefit here to get a package of benefits that you live in a state of war crimes in a place we can eat like an abortion. And I'm more now that cover the cost of traveling out of state felt the people of the option for my abortion. At that point would be accurate if he says that the more Congress. I don't eat it, but if a framework for doing a document court. I think Teixeira can't thank you enough for you was to receive they look like stay in this records everything. If you are bored I sell that we do.

We talk so much about guns but men. There's so much going on. The course will watch a show tonight Jenna bream.

Thank you… What resources of your personal subscriber list of Maoist foxes are just start