Democrat Senators Ask Judge Barrett Repulsive Questions

Jay Sekulow information hearing in a very classy classy way. No repulsive questions in my group in America think this had a hard time of illness and women can serve as an effort by some in the level marginalize contribution because you come out on a different side of an issue, particularly abortion.

So this hearing committee is an opportunity to not punch the rate last ceiling's concrete barrier around conservative women you going to shatter that very lines are open question six is history being made. Folks, this is the first time in American history that we've nominated a is unashamedly pro-life and embraces her faith without apology and she's going to court circulars Jay Sekulow but will was glad you're here for you today.

That's right subject: some of the people from bench,. Talk about what's happening here will and you heard that open Amy Cody Barrett. I was worried today. Three now of the hearings yesterday was the first real day like that actually went back and forth just sit there one opening statement questions first questions day out we were all expecting after day one, mild like the most part a lot of this.

However, some senators throughout some pretty nasty questions throughout some nasty comments others a lot of pop culture reference much I appreciate there's a two or three Star Wars references within cantina scene reference and related materials that it represents pretty cool that you at least keep it interesting. But overall there were some moments will were to talk about just a couple of the next segment got pretty hard-core as he said these are moments where conservative female is up there. You would think there would be some respect there are kids are in the audience that will be a little bit different in the Lindsay Ramage and shattering the barrier and to paraphrase something that my dad say when you shatter the barrier the demons and zombies would come out.

This is Halloween season, it felt that way in the Senate for the confirmation hearing. Well baby that's right in moving into it in the next segment but after what started out seemingly pretty tame hearing and really what all the media outlet. It is well shows that the Democrats know that she's just going to sail through their not really trying to go to to keep the class aggressive. They they mainly framed around the affordable care act. For most of the hearing and trying to make it more political, which she called out many times like you're talking about policy here. Every time they always bring up I got a phone on row I can answer that question.

No kidding. That's not the process, and that that's not the process.

Ever been some reason they feel like that's a gotcha question as if the people who are watching the series, haven't walked the last few yet.

Look, I mean I think it is also evidence they don't have a whole lot substantive – I think it's evidence of what you just had a conversation with Will that they know she can be confirmed.

In fact, we had a couple of senators, specifically Sheldon Whitehouse today say something along the lines to judge Barrett of when you get up to the court. Keep this in mind as if it's almost a foregone conclusion. But I do think it's evidence that they know it's fait accompli. They know the judge Barrett did very good job yesterday. They know they can't stop or I know were waiting to the next segment to get into this to Logan but I'll look some of the lines of questioning over the line and tell you it over the line absolutely overlie will get to hear the next segment, some state to share this with your friends. We got a big show ahead really break down everything happened yesterday they wanted. Now we are on break right now which is good for us because were able talk to you on day three of the confirmation hearings gives a call. Also, what 800-684-3110 give 100 684 30 what's it also didn't want to say thanks for working ACLJ. We also just launched the first video on the bald Eagle YouTube channel. If you kids check out bald Eagle on YouTube bald Eagle.com offers George Washington love to dance is available right now.

It's a great informational video kids needed the most to check it out there and support that work@aclj.org will be right back more Jay Sekulow challenges facing Americans constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to consider for law and justice on the frontlines projecting your freedoms and rights in court in Congress.

And we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you Knox well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you personally. Patient includes all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means many ways your membership is powering the right question mission life today online/secular reprogram also joined the Washington DC area that I was because the stuff was happening in Washington DC, August day three of the Amy Amy Cody Barrett confirmation hearings) court last day and said it's almost a predetermined situation of her passing making it through but you never know the kind of curveballs we thought that Brett Cavanaugh's well that had Artie sort of wrapped up with everything reopen the people were expecting that kind of fireworks that we can call the situation. However, they had that did not stop a few choice senators and sublevels.

Yeah, no doubt about it. I mean, I thought the low point in the hearing yesterday.

Logan was when Sen. Corona was questioning judge Barrett. She had a whole line of questioning, but then at one point she decided that she was can ask a 48-year-old mother of seven, whether or not she's ever committed sexual assault.

I kid you not.

I think you're probably the sound but Logan and she said since you became a legal adult. Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors went on to ask about sexual assault look Logan I mean were supposed to buy just as they were first have a presumption of innocence on everything in the United States of America, but especially when you're talking about a sitting judge with a record that she has with a family and children sitting behind her to go down this line of questioning without any evidence without any reason or inclination to go down it Logan.

That's what bothered me referring to try to make a reference for people remember about the Cavanaugh hearings right margin, currently at the ACLJ were currently in the season that you hiring some some job openings were doing a lot of interviews like that said, with no reason to ask this question, no version of the site okay.

It's quick question.

Let's take a listen to the senator from Hawaii. Yes, this is Sen. Corona by 18 let's roll.

Tensioning the fitness of nominees for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench I to any of the other positions for any of the committees in which they appear.

I asked each nominee. These two questions and I will ask them if you since you became illegal I don't have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committing any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature. Have you ever face discipline or entered into settlement related to this kind of conduct pretty direct answer there, but also a question that I think made everyone cringe the audience would feel little straight to the lack of body fat is the people there watching at home. I made a lot of headlines as were the questions we heard about this last night. People brought it up to me. Did you see this can you believe this. Yes, of course, I can't believe it. This is the times were living at where nothing is off basically said regardless of who's in the audience, or if you feel like this. There's even any sort of claim to that you can hit them with something so egregious it it's really inappropriate it's really disturbing and I'm glad to see that overall it does actually seem to have struck a nerve with people I maybe both sides are well and the other thing to me as her family is in the audience they're sitting there right behind her and she's being asked these demeaning questions. These are they do that though entire game plan but it's it's the subtext of what she's asking why she's asking to this accomplished judgeship and it was just really repulsive and I think to a lot of people. It was as well. I know that Sen. Geraldo tries to put forward. I'm asking everyone this what I mean. Since the cows eat at all for political points. It it doesn't it's just if there were ethics violations or things of that nature that would be a different way to go about that. Not in just a weird open ended, pointed question like this when there is no allegation of any of the sort against the giant adjacent balusters in Hawaii if you're listening right now in Hawaii gives a call one 800 684 31 to what you feel about the senator representing you and your Hawaiian values think that something that I know a lot of people I met many people from Hawaii.

If you like. This is not the kind of questions they will ask great family people there will there's other topics, generously hit ones that are very important to our listeners. Whether it was abortion. Pro-life situations and in a lot of times they were trying to get that gotcha answer and she was pretty straightforward so that she believes what she believes but is also here to uphold the rule of law she's really just on a fantastic job of stating her judicial philosophy being an original list a textual list and also saying you know her mentor was Scalia the late Justice Scalia and that she hurts Killian right, but also that she saying you know because of this philosophy, this judicial philosophy because it's not so political where you can kind of look at a liberal judge in know how they're going to rule every time almost based on the politics of it that it it's it's refreshing to hear the way she describes a regionalism that there are differences within that philosophy that judicial philosophy and I think that she's done a very good job showcasing that as well as presenting herself as someone who will be an impartial judge being political. I think you had Oxley Carla Harris made a few appearances. So far throughout this I really using this as a campaign stop right and grandstanding in fan. I think you look it really her statements are not sure if we have any uphold specifically where she talks about what's happening with Amy Barrett but is certainly not holding back on this being a good moment for her to to get some viewers get some ratings in the terms of the election in a couple thoughts on that Logan first of all, once again she was participating virtually from literally one floor down from the hearing room today, stop connection.

I know I J Ike I don't understand that Logan but I also don't understand how it safe. One floor down, but not in the room that IDC has actually certified as compliant, but that aside, she got an opportunity last night and pride prime time to issue questioning and yet she met him. She largely turned it into a cans pain speech. A judge bear didn't have a whole lot of opportunity to respond to your point about bringing up hot topic issues.

Again, she lectured a 48-year-old mother of seven about abortion frequently and and she did. Ironically, Logan while submitting for the record to letters of opposition, one from Planned Parenthood and one from Planned Parenthood action so clearly is not disqualifying for, Harris to have a pro-abortion view, but apparently it might be for Judge Barrett to have a pro-life you so I don't. I hope the irony of that wasn't lost in the American people thought it was a look at later sale of red election season right to vote for elections have consequences of her to say that and nausea they doing this is one of the you're hopefully putting up a justices that not only are going to uphold the law, but are part of what the American people are looking for and I think that this is one of those one of those pics.

Hopefully, you know, you never know with all that in those situations where you you think justice that's one made the good and the bad end of it is getting a one way and they deftly go the other. It's just part of it. So that's why I'm not the person whereby my Amy Cody Barrick T-shirt by the coffee mug and say that this is the great savior and you know that's not that's not how the should roll II think that there is AA, they want to do that because your it's a refreshing moment like and I hope she does great job and help shape a rules how she feels is correct. However, you never know people did that for Robert's people done that for other other spring or just dues that certainly had mixed opinions to say the least.

So I got I was one of put that caveat in there before you go put on the bumper sticker in the T-shirt yes we think she should be confirmed absolutely. And I think that she represents the views we do here at the AZ LJ. I believe she does it well.

However, you never know when you never know until you're actually there ruling and I think it changes a lot to measure difficult sure yet. Let's go to Scott calling on line 3 from Colorado Scott you're on Jay Sekulow lives welcome Scott, thanks for attending with me and will and they okay will Logan thanks for my call, it was a log ACD toys when she didn't get trolled into speculative what she would deal with the APA came up to Roe V Wade and they haven't happened yet, so that they know they didn't do that with other others you know and and try to commit herself to being recused. My question is this. I thought it's all maybe apparent contradiction to the use of the score political points. Several Democratic senators mixed and coated have no idea what that would ACD but they also were trying to protect her tender idol of of the affordable care act and you know it. If the formal characters like to help minorities, particularly in the death toll is highest among minorities is a natural argument against the affordable care act did it didn't work as well. Scott is great, I really don't want to get to the science of Comed and what is being targeted not I got that information from you personally come in on it.

However, I think you're right that does show some of the growing failures within this and will we talked about this and things well, that was clearly they all got together and said right.

This is the talking point mentions a pro-life stuff here electric pro-life dimensions of the other social topics relevant really the big hit is how dare you take away what to take away. She did say it the affordable care act as a say now say ACA right into Scott's point. They were clearly trying to get her to make political statements, policy statements in she every time went back to that is not my job as a judge or justice on the Supreme Court to make policy decisions that is for the legislative branch. I am here to rule on the letter of the right we get back let's explore your phone calls and phone lines like that.

There are some people who are calling Kalinga calls will isolate six of those we get back on Jay Sekulow reprogram on you to only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn cold dishes like will show you how you personally. Publication includes all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online/challenges facing Americans for substantial time, with or without freedom or constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member.

Thank you for your thoughts. Well, this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ. Jay Sekulow live secularly and well, and I think Beverly will do Logan Sekulow reprogram the first half-hour Jay Sekulow isolate ravenous I will take some phone calls and I want to hear about what your thoughts are on Amy Cody Barrick third day email of the hearings. There was a really extreme conversation back and forth from senator from Hawaii. We talked about this are essentially asking about sexual assault, things of that nature in a really appropriate really and kinda cringe moment that happened we do a phone call from a caller from Hawaii from Lena. That's right, Lena, line 1 in Hawaii year on Jay Sekulow live call I need, about Hawaii Hawaii graceful sinful ways question sexual and not be present what she's doing and with the family stating that that was not an appropriate question pertaining to the confirmation Supreme Court And so I wanted to come in because I stop on face book and on social media put more out for the people on the office and let her know we are so and how she is not the people on the ground. I don't know why we voted it back in 19 but I'm sorry to say that she is thinking for just leaving. I believe Nancy led a shameful from Hawaii is to represent the voice of why a lot of people want to hear and I believe I look you can say whatever you want me to live.

Maybe I tends to be more liberal than the not however I've been their experience that these are family people. These people who are amazing is that islanders who do amazing stuff you have just great passion for families who put that sort of uncut know you're comfortable but appropriate setting right just does not seem to represent the people who I've met people I know from that state and I would say the same.

Look where it were up from the south say think this is coming from Tennessee. Your description Georgia, Alabama, I think you would be surprised and shocked at something like this just doesn't feel like it invokes the emotion of what the person is supposed to represent him well in his Lena brought up that it wasn't. It didn't feel like it was on par with the values of the people of the state and I think sometimes these senators get in this Washington bubble and obviously the senator was trying to score political points.

She was trying to make that an issue by doing this on this grand stage and and make this point to try to tarnish the reputation of the judge, by bringing up what happened in the Cavanaugh hearings and I think they and can probably speak to this to sometimes even outside of the left and right issues on policy that a Sen. or Congressman or Congresswoman gets to DC and forget some of the values of their representatives and just go straight for the Rall political points and doesn't play well back home.

I would say probably the rule rather than the exception.

And I think it's probably why the cry for term limits is got louder and louder look. Sen. Geraldo is a duly elected senator from the state of Hawaii and she has a complete right to have a different view different view untreated judicial philosophy and judge. She has a complete right to vote against Judge Barrett, both in the committee and on the floor of the Senate.

But what I don't think she has a right to do is put forward baseless insinuations and accusations. I mean, the presumption of innocence goes to all American citizens including those who are putting their names on the line to serve. So what I'm to say to center around a stay in your lane if you want to vote against the judge fine, but reflect the views and the values of your residents who voted for you and maybe the grandstand is good that other options also to right-handed question. There's other things you can do other than make this big TV moment. No, no question about it. I mean I actually I think that's probably been the most important impressive thing about Judge Barrett is these senators Logan have a full staff. They had two full weeks to prepare. They can take these questions in any direction they want. It's Judge Barrett, who has no idea what's coming. That's what makes her reliance on no notes so impressive any senator or owner was literally reading from a binder fall, she selected that question two regionally prepared to read it. Judge Barrett is the one that did know it was, but yet Logan it's a great point Sen. Geraldo is donning any direction she wanted.

She chose to going that well in fan with a question like that. Doesn't that make the importance of the senator's meeting with the candidate for the hearings as they were given the opportunity to do all the Democrats declined to do that wouldn't have been a more appropriate place for a question like that instead of grandstanding, putting it on television in front of her family. If you're in a private meeting and you try to get to know someone and it II don't think that be the question I would go with a more appropriate setting, but they chose not to meet their I think the question is if you're trying to glean information from the nominee than that would have been the more appropriate the settings asked that question and, but, well, if you're looking for a TV moment. If you asked that question behind closed doors.

It never gets up on TV. I think that we never mentioned that she never gets her name is set on radio and here we are doing ourselves. Let's take out one call before we go into break. Also Brian in Hawaii calling a believe a line to line online to your on Jay Sekulow live call just wanted everything now.

Sen. Geraldo's position is not the position that the majority of the people here in Hawaii. She majority of people in Hawaii here. There are very family oriented. The state of Hawaii because it's blue. Unfortunately it's been that way for about 65. It is corrupt as the day is long, and that's probably the reason why we remain in a heavily Democratic controlled state, but the very thought that she went after the judge in this manner is it's an indication of what we deal with during every election cycle, whether it's in between made Presidential elections or just for real estate or colonies.

She's continued to listen better spread. It really is for a lot of people become This bad taste in my mouth because they feel that everyone looks at it that way another's great hutch across the board and there's also some that just lost her mind would senator in Rome. Unfortunately, she has lost her mind. I have no idea why she would choose to go… Questions of the woman who is clearly well deserved choice for the Supreme Court and asked out rages question but I just wanted to call and say that we, as she does not speak and often conscious that I speak for the people of what she does not seem in relevance is all she's ever done in her career is to try and be relevant and this is just more fodder that here and also the most part, those that are in control, lost a really solid point for he had a break. I want to encourage people to show if you don't get the second half hour finds online run Facebook live right now the Jay Sekulow page. Also available on demand later on on all social media platforms was a podcast ride. I appreciate appreciative: lion showing what their state really represents.

I think there will be change and people will grow and you will see movement in different states in different directions.

People like Brian are are some of those really great people who are out there trying to make sure the people Washington actually represent them. ACLJ NACLJ got our check out our new kids channel called legal beagle to be on YouTube or ball beagle.com to support the work and see that late check out will and I each everyday on the Logan Sekulow reprogram on YouTube. Enjoy this Logan Sekulow reprogram Facebook group that right now on the frontlines protecting your freedoms and rights in court in Congress in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thanking God's will.

This perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ Jay Sekulow Jay Sekulow live, this is Logan Sekulow were talking about day three of those are governed day two of the Amy Cody Barrett, Supreme Court hearings, so my brother Jordan secular passing the baton. The segment join him take back over what he what the show I want to thank everyone who is listed as enjoyed our first half-hour again. Would you like to constantly do each everyday on YouTube. We do the Logan Sekulow reprogram fight on my YouTube channel. YouTube.com/Logan Sekulow reprogram or just search Logan Sekulow subscribe to the channel. I will really appreciate it. We'd love to have you as one of our viewers as well cover a lot of similar content made from a little bit of a different point of view.

I think you like it and it is a really great time with other that will should we call him and let's call at 1-800-684-3110 if you want to be heard on air were talking about day three of the Barrett confirmation hearings and actually wanted to get to this really quickly before and get Jordan's thoughts on it as well. Yesterday, Sen. Blumenthal had a line of questioning about an opinion that that Judge Barrett had written and he was very fixated on something that he thought was in the opinion, should we play the sound. You should play this out because this just shows your sale Blumenthal you guys know liar. He lied about his service in Vietnam and he did it again this is your share commitments ridiculously huge staff going to Google Atlanta 60 people working for they can't figure out the right question. Take a listen. Your opinion in Cantor goes farther than Justice Scalia and Helen are in fact characterized it as kind of radical. It is in effect an outline and it is in fact radical is radical, in the opinion I think you said quote. It sounds kind of radical to say felons can have firearms.

That's a direct quote particular language you can just thinking about it, we can look it up and I think you may check it sounds kind of radical because it is that was not in the opinion he made all of that up clearly was reading off some cut some wood gave him that line. This is very this shows you.

This is why I believe Democrats are not in the position that the polls show them in because there's something wrong with their teams.

Their teams are not getting the job done. I don't know if they feel defeated because Judge Barrett like you were talking about her cheeks. I'm not ready to crown her as the notorious ACB yet but she certainly has the potential to be. And you know it took Justice Ginsburg years to develop that that persona course. I think she has the potential be this awesome example to the two young women to say you could be liberal you can be a conservative and you can make it to the US Supreme Court. If this is what your passion is you have children and you can do it all, which is always what Justice Ginsburg was about his as well.

You don't have to be a liberal to do so now you have to go through a lot more as a conservative, but it I think will be great for conservative families out there and if you check if your child grows up within. Once a good law school has that philosophy to know there's someone out there, especially women like her.

If you have daughters who who made it and and had the position had the notoriety in a lot of ways I listen to it when I listen to Judge Barrett. I hear I hear Alito and I hear Scalia if you just wrote the words down, but it's a different tone.

It's a different and and the tone does matter with the judge.

It it's a bit so it's tougher for these Democrats to not look absurd but the line I mean that's the biggest problem with her is that you said something was radical and then and then it was even there.

So Blumenthal lies again, but this is a guy who literally he lied about his entire life fact checks anything right is a via absolutely right we get back is also to be at least a guess, and Internet comes their sins can be said that Bennett is held NACLJI don't think for the 11,000,005 each everyday of Logan Sekulow reprogram again that's on YouTube find me there. Subscribe season the challenges facing Americans as time went on now freedoms for constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms and rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member thanking God's well this perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable voice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold is like it will show you how you personally and includes all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is powering the right question for mission life today online/Jay Sekulow live that my brother was nice to have his back and forth that the first 30 minutes with loaded will because you know it's it's serious. Obviously, to have the confirmation hearings of the Supreme Court nominee, but it you have seen now the Democrat party specifically and Democrat senators turn this into a joke either.

They give political speeches and people just turn it off.

This document is not the best place to give you everybody's covering it, but like you think they really want to hear Kemal Harris again on it for you here in the affordable care act. You can hear you all over the country instead you get the present. He's doing actual campaign rallies. He's back out. They got both, then I think this needs to be underscored as well that whole idea that there is to be a quorum. There's I could be a vote they can't get this through committee. Guess what the Republicans will be there to be the Republicans in the room providing the corn they were saying there might not might not be a quorum because the Republicans were sick and they wouldn't provided and yet it seems to be the Republicans in the are the only ones that are willing to be in the room door and I just quickly wanted attack on just kind of on that same thought you we just heard from Sheldon Whitehouse this morning, Sen. Whitehouse, he was attacking amici participation in the process and I want to go all the way down that rabbit trail, but I do want the American people to understand what that attack was because we engage as amici on their behalf in in the judicial process. All of the time and look Jordan, you know this better than I do but it is a feature not a bug of the American judicial process that the American people can participate in it as amici. So when Sheldon Whitehouse tries to throw all these terms like dark money around in anonymous donors and that they shouldn't be able to participate in the amici process.

Jordan what he is attacking is our members. The American people's ability to participate in the judicial process and I'll say it again. That is a feature not a bug of the American judicial process, and we should not eliminate your right to Harry Hutsell and Tigger phone calls to on this one, 800-684-3110.

How outrageous for Sen. Maisie Toronto said well you nice. I asked this to all nominees now.

She executions his long history of doing that first time she did it was to judge and now Justice Cavanaugh is completely made up whatever blasé Ford liar investigation goes on no evidence of this. She wants to continue with this question about no did you ever sexually assault anyone.

Did you ever have you ever made at a settle. I had to give have to settle this is someone who's already gone through the gone through the process of becoming a university professor at a top law school. They have gotten that they are member of the bar. They also which she Judge Barrett with your confirmation hearings that were very nasty to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and then all the sudden we need to ask her in front of her children if she sexually assaults people and by the way Sen. Rona. She really believes that this is a question that now need to just be asked and put on the record for everybody in the treatment and women the same.

Why not meet with with Judge Barrett do it there or if you want a more efficient response. Put it in writing. Judge Barrett had to issue an had to answer a number of written questions. Harry, if that's one that at the center. Rona one to put in. I wouldn't have that. I'd still seems ridiculous is that the same kind of criticism she's trying to trash I someone who I'm pretty comfy can say now is going to be on the Supreme Court, United States and and you know I think there's a danger you end up you take some risk that a conservative judicial philosophy just push them push them further to the right, absolutely, I think Sen. Geraldo continues to engage in a pattern which she commenced in the Cavanaugh hearing. She basically creates a fictional parade of horrible. She then presumes that the nominee is guilty with out a scintilla of probative evidence and so one of the questions that blisters should ask Sen. Geraldo has she asked her fellow Democrats about their pattern of sexual assault should absolutely touch guy how she asked fellow Democrats about whether or not they retain a sense of smell, enabling them to become serial Harris members so Sen. Geraldo just like many Democrats continues to engage in a pattern of cringe worthy conduct which is unworthy of a Sen. absolutely unlike anything take inside the hearings back now actually go to a Sierra Club chart that she can get she get nasty to say, see where she's going on day two of this. Let's take a listen than 800 businesses have closed every day 30 million people were out of work at the height of the pandemic still down 10 million jobs and so one of the things anything going on his leasing more and more consolidation and leading me to antitrust and that part of this. I think it's that covert relief package we have to pass but also antitrust competition is a driving force of our economy to jump in right there. The covert release package they have to pass that they won't pass about Amy Kubicek to call Nancy Pelosi until it passed something get it done for the American people also presents connected with your Executive Order. I think he ultimately will and what is what he can do. Probably Sierra Club charge will end up challenging that Executive Order in court said its hypocrisy after hypocrisy that it is the Republicans who were not willing to pass more covert relief. They put it on the table. They try to compromise if they got up in the amounts and Nancy Pelosi's house will not let it through. In fact, she's not letting the house to take a vote on it. I think if Nancy Pelosi left the house, take a vote on it than a lot of Democrats because they're all up for reelection. The house would be voting for that compromise of the so-called centrist in her caucus I think is probably unfair name for them. Jordan at the so-called centrist are actually demanding that she did just that.

Put the measures on the floor that everybody agrees with the President has Artie said repeatedly he would sign them the DirectX for Americans.

The replenishing of the paycheck protection program of the education funding. All of those items would pass in Jordan here's the other thing that the senators on the committee are just conveniently omitting Jordan leader McConnell has already said that the next item that's good to be on the Senate floor when they reconvene next week. It's not to be the nomination of Judge Barrett. She'll still be in committee. The be waiting for them to move out. Jordan it's gonna be another covert relief package there. They're talking about. They don't want to move Judge Barrett because they want to do covert relief first.

Jordan it's already scheduled to be the next item on the floor and guess what, the same senators that are calling for their gonna go down to the Senate floor and what they can do about no go vote no against the package that they are asking leader McConnell to put on the floor right now folks I want to hear this. I want your thoughts to 1-800-684-3110 G believe we are getting closer and closer to election day early voting is beginning all over the country if it was Artie started saving the states.

It started later that that's beginning to search the lines outside freezing solid today on my way and ends and it's exciting to see but I think these hearings may set a new tone because Judge Barrett was nominated by Pres. Trump.

These are the kind of individuals he chooses to be on this record whether Stabile is his advisors his cabinet members and people getting to see that again really smart, really good people. You combine all that different factors here that with its from court justice.

That night I just think this is why were seeing Judge Barrett, who Harry could have been treated like the female version of Cavanaugh, I think I don't I don't think they would be as aggressive because it just doesn't look good and not try to be sexist, but I think that there playing politics.

They can only go so far on you know the allegations of misconduct. I think that what they were hoping to do is try to make a sound or try to make it look stupid and instead she went up there and did what only I think John Roberts is as may be done and can just give silica lease on every opinion she's authored, but also on all of the major Supreme Court cases are being addressed.

She's now getting into. I broke away from it is not the top, a showing of fraud is put into antitrust which these are a lot of these case to make to speak with Dr. big ticket that on abortion the night of free speech cases that the bit, but there's huge case of implications that affect us because the economy and she is just put Shabbat as hearsay. The right now she takes it all in and you could see the mind working, ready to respond and she does it in that legal way point by point by point absolutely and so one of the characteristics of any county Barrett besides her brilliance is that she is incredibly call. She is self processed and she has a memory of more than 600 cases which have excuse me, the Supreme Court has decided I think the Democrats have decided Cavanaugh hearings backfired and now the senators, the Democratic senators are left with doing what they are simply lobbing judge any county. Barrett, presuming that she will indeed be confirmed and hoping that she will vote their way. That is what they have been reduced to the cause of any county. Barrett's brilliance levitates of folks. I'm not can it prejudge anything that's gonna come before Judge Barrett. But what I can tell you is I'm pretty excited when someone says my philosophy, repeating it over and over is Justice Scalia's net did show on the Seventh Circuit but see if it holds on the Supreme Court don't need to put the crown like the notorious ACP crown on her yet but certainly certainly she's got the potential potential to be the example of the 10 new head of conservative only one. A society can agree most vulnerable. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold mission will show you how you personally patient includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists ramifications. 40 years later there what Obama care means to discover many ways your membership is empowering the right question mission in life today online/challenges facing Americans for substantial time, with or without freedom or constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice ACLJ on the front lines projecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you for your thoughts. Well, this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ Jay Sekulow this Jordan secular again. The second round of questioning. I will tell you, folks, and some nastiness which had nothing to with substance. Judge Barrett appears to be sailing through.

I think that when you saw Sigurd Tillis return sooner likely return. We are on path and to get this to the committee.

Therein it tomorrow. She's done after today, Dick attempted to go until Stange or so people know, like how long could this potentially go today because yesterday's finished up fairly early yet depend with the appetite of the senators is there is a possibility they could go to 1/3 round of the second round will likely be wrapped up by the dinner hour Jordan and I suspect the way it's going. That's probably basically at the end of it.

I think if a couple of senators wanted 1/3 round. My guess this is just my guess. I think term agreement probably give it to them because he's been so impressive. But my guess is around the dinner hour yeah and so and then that's it that's all really hear from Judge Barrett because then fan it's going to be witnesses whose support her and don't support her and honestly the American people don't pay a lot of attention to that. Not saying it's not important it's a part of the process and of course it's great to hear from people who can tell this their story of knowing Judge Barrett and then you have people say why she's not caught the plane. I don't know you know yet who the Democrats are bringing. I don't have that note, I wonder enough to be the Planned Parenthood world without the AC ACLU world because because you know Harry you come from the, the, the world of higher education is a law professor and they made a big deal. Yesterday they screwed up again because he said all these Notre Dame professors have signed a letter against Judge Barrett's confirmation.

Interesting fact that out of all those professors. Not one, not a single one was on the faculty of Notre Dame's law school, absolutely. So one of the things that the media likes to do is to conflate two things.

The law school vis-à-vis the liberal arts faculty and in many universities, law professors are left wing movements brought even more true. Many liberal arts faculty members are strongly from the left it like it to fit this point and is a liberal arts. What I would say the law professors are that say that liberal arts were they like embracing that absolutely and also I would say Notre Dame has a reputation in the law school does is being a middle-of-the-road law school with some conservative lawyers and some liberal lawyers but the liberal arts faculty, particularly the librarians the anthropologists they want any county Barrett essentially to recuse herself to postpone her nomination. This is absolutely nonsense.

The President is fulfilling his constitutional duty he has nominated Amy 20 Barrett and she did deserves an up or down vote by the United States Senate. Yeah, it's interesting were looking at the names of some of the people who are going to be. They just released that on the panels and I'm going through right now summer from law firms may pay works for her hours with her. I see I'm interested to see Anna she would school in InRoads and Memphis in her undergraduate another attorney added Columbia, South Carolina, and just looking through here. There's a retired judge of the Court of Appeals for the district of IDC.

I would assume that someone who she got snow may be as a clerk at the DC Court of Appeals, not for the judge but but again you get to know and then some from it. Sounds like some like potentially liberal group. She got some some law professor, but these are not big names that I'll tell you that they did not get the big hitters yeah no I don't recognize a lot of names on the list or and I suspect I'll probably continue with the Democrats have done and tried tell sympathetic stories of people that have pre-existing conditions. By the way, that something that Judge Barrett knows an awful lot about with her family and will go into detail about. I think she can certainly sympathize with that situation I Jordan I did want to just quickly mention this, though it's not gonna work. I mean she had eight she had a +3 rating among voters is first.

Let that be more people wanted to confirm her, then didn't when she was nominated a Jordan that number. According to morning consult and politico, which is not exactly inclined to support concern is that is up for up to a number of 17.

She has a 17 percentage margin among voters that won her confirm and don't want to confront that's pretty overwhelming.

Jordan especially because they show you those poles Harry that say people think you should be waiting until after the election.

You know what those poles come, those poles are all done before they get to see the nominee absently got to see they got to see Judge Barrett. They say you know what present Trent made a good decision here. Who cares about that.

This is there an election this this this the kind of person spends record, I would want her to be justice if if either case before the court and we often do with ACLJI think Amy 20 Barrett has made a very convincing case on her behalf. That's number one number two. The initial poll results reflected Democratic lobbying against nominating anyone, but I think once the American people have had the opportunity to listen to judge any county. Barrett, they realize that this is a brilliant nomination. A lot of this hearing now has been about issues that are political that Congress can determine like covert relief funding like the affordable care act and in and you know addressing that the downfalls of it.

The problems with it in your present trumpet said he's run it as best as he can. So it is better now that it was before he got rid of the individual mandate stuck Coverage for pre-existing conditions and ineffective got it because that the individual mandate, there really isn't an affordable care act the way it was intended to force you to be on it, but it's still not great is he said it's not perfect, they can't fix it. It's still a disaster takes a lot of hard work just to keep it up and going.

So this idea again. I think the Democrats are actually pointing to the fact that present trumpet does what he says he helps the American people as his number one priority is taking care and protecting the American people. So even if he's got a bad program to run.

He's gonna run that bad program put the people into run as best as possible.

And now you got Democrats running on something that they were running away from remember any presence of got elected in 2016, saying I'm get ready for the character in the got it and get rid individual mandate on they want, and lots of other Republicans did do it in the platform. It's not a real popular and so I think maybe because he's done a little bit better job at also. This I got up like to have some time here goes plate because Nancy Pelosi's hypocrisy to with Wolf Blitzer take a listen. The chairman of the high risk high risk virus that halogen would respect the knowledge that goes into needing any of the nagging people thinking in failing to defending the administration. All this time with no knowledge of the difference between active bells and I thank you for giving Yaphet to say that to you and that is because I certainly these are incredibly difficult times right now and will leave it on that note, thank you so much for joining is that you are not right on.

This will not hate to say that that's not about me it's about millions of Americans who Put food on the table who can't pay the rent and are having trouble getting my long Food Lion. I know you are. I'm just saying we know them as we say our family that perfectly the enemy of the good as they say LA near perfect speaker always the case that were not even close to the time let's see what happens because every day is critically critically important. Thanks so much for joining us contentedly to my constituents need. I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging for food, begging for money, speaker fact, we think that we think them.

I don't know what she's talking because she's not providing the covert relief we have only 20 seconds left is the problem. It's close.

If this is good if you're conservative, picking up on something that we picked up on last election cycle when Nancy Pelosi starts get into a fight with Wolf Blitzer on CNN there's a problem inside the Democrat party they're not in sync and you don't want to not be in same decades. ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ