Share This Episode
Matt Slick's Top 6 Matt Slick Logo

MS Top 6 #53

Matt Slick's Top 6 / Matt Slick
The Cross Radio
September 29, 2021 5:00 am

MS Top 6 #53

Matt Slick's Top 6 / Matt Slick

On-Demand Podcasts NEW!

This broadcaster has 158 podcast archives available on-demand.

Broadcaster's Links

Keep up-to-date with this broadcaster on social media and their website.


September 29, 2021 5:00 am

Matt gets calls on Biblical Theology. Matt has answers on Biblical Theology. The sound bites are from "Home Alone," Frank Sinatra, "The Doors," and "The Spice Girls." The questions come from people all over the world.  We've compiled the six most memorable of the week. Number 6 to #1! 

  • -->
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

This is good Truth Network Jackson research ministry matters, a Masters of Divinity and is working he's passionate and met stands firm and lives to defend and promote the Christian faith. Matt slick doesn't take any Monday through Friday. Matt takes calls from all around the world on his radio show. We compiled this week's best, Matt slick's top 6X now I say is when Jesus was on the earth. In Matthew 1222 232. He mentioned something because Jews were his casting of the power of the devil and he said that in order to cast out demons. The strong man must first be found. So he's doing it. So therefore logically it must be the sickness mounted fan now is still bound to the question we don't know five to life right now it is in line with the overall apostasy that the Bible prophesies a second vessel is to first three letters approach apostasy must come first before the Antichrist will be revealed and so apostasy was up along with the truth. Now the elect of God can't do that 2424 that's the invisible church.

Those are true converts but the visible church. The church at large, goaded out of church to get a violent or handy walk in the church people like that with us and they are not Christian everybody that's that they the public churches movement in America are supposed to go.

Apostasy. The Bible prophesies. So where are we were not quite there over moving that way.

I I considered planets part of the second heaven first heaven is wearing the wind and rain clouds in the second heaven is the things we see in the night sky. The sun, stars and the planets he didn't know what planets necessarily, but except actually, did because Mars they knew about and Venus. They knew about and other planets that they could see move and I think the cold and wandering stars so they were aware of the latest and think about terms we do not, during my studies of the years and I've discovered is the name of God, Yahweh, and the title's sovereign Jesus Christ God, these are all addresses to the true and living God and all of our addresses to the true and living God should be with respect to figure God with honor because he is great and there's nothing greater than him so if someone uses the Lord's name in vain is an unbeliever and he says all my etc. she's using a title refers to the true and living God, and is using it as an exclamation of anger. Sometimes this is using that name of God himself. In vain for non-reverential manner. You do you believe that Jesus is God in flesh. It didn't feel he was crucified across from the dead. So the Bible says he rose bodily and so who are you judge what the writers gave us and say he didn't write that physically went they the eyewitnesses as they did for you think that a lot of the case of aeronautical to cry, didn't you. Not a fair thing know you're not a Christian. I'm telling you find out you deny the physical resurrection first 2015 1417 Christ not raise her faith is in vain. John 219 to 21 Jesus says that despite his temple three days I will raise enough so if you deny the physical resurrection of Christ. You're not a Christian. Now I'm not that you're misinforming you. If you have a right you will you wait the minute monologue and you object to whatever reason. Like it or not, the neck village and murder infant would you do that now because that's what God commands them first thing 15 three God wrong for doing what's moral standard. Do you have that universally applicable to which God himself must obey some which could dismantle you said that God is wrong for doing this is my question is that you wouldn't do it for an earthly king is righteous for God. All people who live according to Scriptures, have sinned against God, and have inherited original sin and therefore worthy of being executed.

God has the right to execute people and it would never be considered murder, so your implication that he would murder people is simply wrong.

You don't understand the issues at hand. This is the way we hope you've enjoyed this episode of Matt slick stop. Six. For more on math and is live syndicated call-in radio show goaded TruthNetwork.com got a question Matt slick as your answer. This is the Truth Network