Pelosi & Schumer’s Scheme to Take Over Elections

Lucy Schumer's gaming lies all of our collection talk about how they're doing today on site giving human born now this is what I hear from you.

Call one 863, 11. Yesterday the supreme good day. There's a lot of speculation could be the vaccine may vacate that was heard it was not his opinion on the case involve civil service to the military I wanted. It was a regular schedule. It was a regular schedule to be a day and not jogging. That was the only opinion today so we are still awaiting the vaccine mandate case.

From this frequently is a couple things about that because it's been so much speculation of the speculation is been running rampant on this and that is you know, the fact is, there is no statement issued. The law went into effect on Monday companies around the country making good faith attempts to apply the solicitor Gen. redefine good faith by saying only it's just mask requirements are not vaccinated. The testing tinkle effect for a number of months so I say that that the guts of the bill of the law. The most difficult compliance part for people would've been the testing is not available has been moved to February so maybe that dictates of some of the urgency off but clearly minified votes for an administrative statement of God will get Sally some of the urgency versus on February 1 and it is so you stay on this is the kind opinion, the data doesn't have schedule again. So the fact that the case was expedited. That expedited review in this case, which means that they may jammed the briefing we had a brief the case over the course of both sides of about 12 days after the court was not back at the specialists that they heard the case. Our reply brief is due January 3, they argue, January 7 when the expectation was that we were going to get a stay that afternoon because it was a lot of talk about the administrative stays and what happened was in the process. We can get it now that that could just mean that they coming up with a substantive decision on on all of it. Either way, we don't know. I don't want to speculate like a tape is been on the decision. As of now, that's right.

So I would start walking you through because it said the teams they've come up with a new ski. This is brand-new folks of how to try and get the voter devoting legislation through their takeover.

It really as we go through the substance of doubt that we know some more about the substance of what would be in this so they've gotten a vehicle that will allow them to at least avoid the first filibuster attempt which is the motion to begin debate and here's how they started doing it so Senate majority Chuck Schumer.

He laid all this out. What will happen down the house. His past and unrelated NASA bill that was stripped of all of its language is no language in the bill know that while the language was then the new languages prepped in their book the freedom to vote.

Act and which is the mansion bill and the voting rights act, which is the John Lewis bill, but it's in this NASA package.

The houses has voted on that it's Artie gone to the Senate because the house is utilizing already used bill. The NASA measure that has nothing to advance the prepackaged voting rights bill does not face a filibuster just to put on the floor of the Senate. It eliminates the motion pursuant to proceed to launch the debate on the bills as well. As a filibuster. So we bounce back the shell bill for the house. The sit it's considered a message between houses should exempt the filibuster on the front end so they can get it now. Yes, we right now it's called to the Senate, they can start the debate aptly probably will very suited. There's reasons why at a certain point, they still have a problem with the 60 vote threshold, filibuster, shoot the cloture issue because it doesn't get around the motion to end debate and have a vote. The question will be, is right. That was the timing on this and if there are than the floats by the dinner and require all Democrats are there subvention sativa Mark Kelly at Arizona plus Kemal Harris to make the change in the rule and into two going through this, but what people need to understand is Senate the house scripted existing bill involving NASA took the language out of the NASA bill. We understand this language out. Then came back and substituted the election law language learning in particular that in order to get to the floor. So this was is called the shell bill is called the shell game what they're doing here we come back really get into than what is actually in this now that we know what they're doing. The challenges facing Americans or substantial time and are now in our freedoms, our constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms and then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn gold mission like it will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists. The ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the Obama care means to the pro-life many ways your membership is powering the right question free copy of mission life today online/writer solutions is even correct issues they care about right now. Joe Biden is below 40% approval ratings in the 30s when you get to the specific issues Americans care about the most is in the 30s there as well 30s on the economy is in the 30s on the covert response is in the 30s on foreign policy, so you there trying to use this to not bring America together behind Joe Biden but you get the left of his party back behind, which is some of that 20% drop off from 50%.

So if you get back up into the 40s because that he's got it dude is angering them to think that he is angering the far left is angering the conservative world that which is half the country as well. And so he's trying to they are doing everything possible he's got his buddy Schumer and Pelosi out to try and do things any just think about this, only if admitted quickly washes it. Then the idea that a NASA bill which which I get I did know a lot about that specific bill but we know that we need more funding for space.

We know that's an issue right now with our national security.

I can imagine their real excited over NASA that they've gotten their whole bill stripped down.

Something may have been able to pass a bipartisan way to to be used for this hyper- partisan manner. We know there can be supporters and opponents of that bill.

As with every bill Jordan. Can you imagine being the supporters of that NASA authority bill right now when it is now being used to take over elections move state control of elections to the federal government. Any luck you. You and I both know how hard it is to move a bill through the legislative process. Imagine getting a bill through the United States Senate.

It's sitting in a house may even have the votes to pass in the house. They call it up, remove all the language that you care about and put in a federal takeover of black is just think about those supporters of the NASA bill for a moment the Jordan, that is how insistent while Washington DC Democrats are on taking over a controlled election, it doesn't even remove that 60 vote threshold journey just pushes it a couple days later but that's how desperate they are to move it down the line. The Quinnipiac poll today said that Pres. Biden's approval rate is 33%. That means only 1/3 of Americans approve that the job is doing. But there's a group of people to have a lower approval rating than that and that is Congress in part the reason there were there you approval rating is so low as they do things like this. They literally removed the text from the NASA bill inserted the text on this election takeover and are sending it back to the Senate is like sending a letter to someone you gotta be addressed and stamped and you take the letter out of the envelope put another N and you try to convince people. It's okay if the same letter I sent the letter or any as we used to call it lame.

This was true you steps you get a call from a client give a shell corporation available which meant a corporation that sitting on your shelf is not being used for anything will stick it in there yet that's exactly what they're doing there there taking a bill to bring about substantive language creating a shell and then pouring into that shell. This nonsense about federal takeover of election and sending it over as a message which gives it some sort of priority status on the Senate agenda and what it really is J is a federal power grab of the most egregious kind.

It's a federal power grab of elections and in my view, it is unconstitutional because the Constitution United States if anyone cares by the way I do says that the manner means and method of conducting elections shall be determined by the state legislatures.

How are they going to get around that constitutional mandate, assuming this thing passes.

Someone please tell me this bill would appoint Mayor, the Atty. Gen. into is an unelected, unaccountable elections are with the power to change state election laws that part of this bill yesterday so I will really go through some of the specifics that because we have so member yesterday were to what is actually to be in this are talking about comparing people to Jefferson Davis Paul Connor given the list went on and George Wallace would buy made that speech would even know what text of what bills he was talking about yet because there's been a lot of confusion about what is actually in this now we know what is going to be there but I want everyone to understand the hoops jumping through stripping out the NASA language so that they can prove just so they can get through one of the usually required filibusters to begin debate. It does not. I want to make it clear they would still have to either change the filibuster rule at the end so fail to get the 60 votes to end debate and have a vote.

The timeline on this very quick were looking at officially tonight. These moves taking place. Having a day or two in between.

So Sunday is that it that the rules to require the said 24. Her 48 hour. So trying to do it before the Martin Luther King holiday music that is the reason why but was we go through the specifics again. Mayor Garwood being the elections are national clearance for all existing voter ID laws that need to get her to approve it matter if you're in a southern state Midwest state states had no issues ever with racial issues or wasn't deemed that the voting rights act to be state of concern if you got it on the books now that even something new about the books now has to go through federal preclearance maintaining a good voter list.

This is this is so unique there's restrictions on state efforts to work together with other states to D Dupre list thanks you want to keep more people on voter list in different places.

That's so you can commit fraud. That's the only reason you would support that they let me ask you this because I look at the situation is. How in the world they possibly actually pull this on the American people are doing it by sleight-of-hand, but the substance of the bill is still horrible mortal day is it literally it it's a federal takeover elections, plain and simple. I mean that they changed the bill for that name from S1 the for the people act but now it's numbered S 2747.

The freedom to vote actually put Joe mansion's name on it day.

They did very very little to change the substance of this, the federal government would still be in charge of everything from voter registration to voter location to voter hours to win those poles had to be open ballot box security redistricting would even be a poor under the purview of the federal government. Now Jake, I'm telling you this is as sweeping as HR one was they just change the name and try to make it a little bit more palatable.

And you're right Jake, I mean it's a sleight-of-hand, but the only thing they did with that sleight-of-hand as they got the bill onto the Senate floor. There will still have to be a vote on whether or not there can change the filibuster to actually get it over the line. Interestingly, J it looks like Sen. Cinema is on her way to the floor of the Senate right now so we might learn a little bit more about where she stands and what the path forward. Is there really are talking about a situation like this, Andy.

The differential of getting this.

There were not as a couple votes Democratic. That's a minute, let's holiday the day I minutes mansion and send them and maybe Kelly the senator from the other senator from Arizona but it's that's like those of the people they're going to make the difference as to whether or not we have federal election control whether we do it on the constitutional way and that is the states control the times method and manner of elections. This is fundamental constitutional law day where they going with this, except a democratic power grab once they get control of elections put into the hands of the federal government then you've got Democrats in control, nor ever.

This is this is more than a power grab. This is taken up our right from the break from the constitutional perspective right states get this provision. So this provision, which is it's two different bills of the combining of the John Louisville also mentions Bill.

This is from the John Louisville that would language it would be in their therapy would make it harder to maintain good voter list that which is absurd but the subject every state to preclearance on any laws that are work are considered voter integrity laws so those would all have been approved by bureaucrats in Washington DC. Let me tell you what, who would be getting approved any red state because everyone loves 98% of bureaucrats in Washington DC are Democrats.

We know this because we can look at open secrets he could see their political contributions right to see where they work. So if you're in a red state you would put in a voter integrity law, even though states like Georgia with their new laws have more early voting, the New York or Delaware that are easier.

Early voting bit easier to requested ballot home New York and Delaware are good to have problems with this is could be Georgia and Tennessee and South Carolina.

It states across the country Arizona who said we want to put integrity back in the system. We don't want the repeated 2020. Now that have to go through preclearance by bureaucrats in Washington DC. There's nothing worse than having to go through preclearance by Democrats Washington DC when I'm done going through what's in here this is just on the tip of the iceberg. But 1 million a minute here was but the I think one of the most dangerous aspects of this is the fact that it literally takes the power out of the state government, which is rested but is set by the Constitution in the in the Congress thinks they can just ignore that provision, the Constitution, and move this over to article 1 section for the Constitution. The elections clause says the time, manner in place of voting is something the state-controlled are totally ignoring that what this bill would do is disembowel voting in America as we know it is a complete takeover of voting, even at the local level by your federal government doing this because they're worried about what is going to happen in about nine months when it is likely no one can guarantee it but likely that the Republicans are Reagan again regain the house and may will regain the Senate this is that this is the issue.

This is completely partisan. This move, they tried to reinvigorate a base of their party. In midterm elections, which they know they're about to lose the house and potentially the Senate exited they were able to get Bill back better through yet so they switch to something else which by the way, is not American people's copies see this is like a top issue because her states had these issues not the federal government like no there's one audience thinks there's worsted here will take your calls about it 100 684 31 two. There's some action items you can take me back this break let you know how it what to do.

One 800 684 30 wanted to talk to us on their only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life.

We created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission life will show you how you are personally and the publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists.

The ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right to question your free copy mission life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans are substantial time and are now free to sort constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades now ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights" in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ. Senator said about your Schumer. This is the she was really as restless as I got out the house by the way, folks, this is now all up to the Senate and they are on a very rushed high by maritime. I did try to get this done before Monday's Martin Luther King holiday so I'm encouraging you I told you to give you an action item.

Right now we are taking phone calls only hundred 684-3110 but you need to call the offices of sitter Cinema sitter Kelly both from Arizona and severe mansion West Virginia you call the Capitol switchboard will put the graphic up on the screen. The number is 202-224-3121. You asked to speak to that individual sitter's office. Remember these three Democrat senators have been on our side of this. So don't going nasty with them. Say that you support your view on the filibuster that that that's important part of the Senate to to remain strong and to not vote to federalize the elections. So just those that simple message remain strong, don't buckle on your support of the filibuster. Okay this is this is a big event where I want to get the sounds ice.

We want to hear myself of what she said but knowing that they invented on this so that it Center Cinema is taking the position that that she's not in the boat to break the filibuster was due to their analysis. Well, it would kill the ability to move this legislation. At this point in time. Jam actually watching the subtitles right now so I'll wait to hear it as well. She did say there might be some reform she would support that. Maybe she still supports the 60 vote threshold will look at that bullet must play out the hypothetical. If she is not willing to go along with leader Schumer and nuking the filibuster. What that would mean is, even though there on the bill now J and and Sen. Schumer might try to file cloture today and in the day he could tee up that vote on Saturday. Say it Saturday cloture to end debate would fail.

Then he would try to nuke the filibuster and without Sen. Cinemas vote.

Here's the key point without her vote, he can't change Senate precedent and he would still have to get 60 votes to end debate. It would end right there.

J which of you would think that if they knew they were going to lose. Why would they take the risk of doing this, the honest opinion here. I think leader Schumer thinks that he has to have this vote to fend off his his left flank against the primary financing on any net that sounds very political day but that really does look like the motivation in Illinois think you're right. Think of hundreds of right. I think Andy was happening here is the left wing of the Democratic Party. The progressive wing of the party has gotten so aggressive that Schumer was a tactician. Okay is a smart guy. We don't agree with a lot of policies. Obviously, he would not be taking this risk if he was not getting press to do it. You don't go into something knowing you don't do that now they maybe this all becoming, now they're all playing a close to the best. I don't know but it to me it seems like that's a heck of a risk is any the Senate for a long time arose to be the Democratic leader in 08, few years ago he was in favor of keeping the filibuster and castigated Republicans who wanted to do away with. It's always been all over the place. But the reality is that he is a you say a tactician he's a smart guy. He understands how you make legislation and he realizes that the left part of this party is pressing him with incredible incredible urgency to do this and is yielding and capitulating good and I think would finance that is right.

He's got the primary opposition that Sandy Cortez may run against him in New York and may beat him in the primary, so he saying I'm going to suck up to the lab the concert to the progressives and I'm in a do this, even though it's a nosedive to oblivion because Sen. center mind mansion may not go along.

We talked about the idea where Joe Biden is been on this you because River in Atlanta. He was saying Matthew don't support his view on this. You're a racist leader you are a ureter traitor to your country of Jefferson Davis you are bull Connor right on the bullying kids out of schools of desegregation.

You are George Wallace leading a political party leaving the Democratic Party to join a political party of just being a white supremacist and made all these comparisons like that except for this Joe Biden was in the streets by Tom cotton is interesting.

I like they did this so sitter cotton on the Senate floor. He gave a speech that is very careful point by 24+ potential scholars will tell us that the reason we have these roles in a set of unlimited debate. Two thirds change the roles.

The idea that 60 have to close off the is embodied in this theory and role of the Constitution. The bottom line is very simple.

Ideologues in the Senate want to turn the founding fathers were the founding fathers called the cooling saucer of democracy into a rubberstamp leadership is a powerful words not mine, word of my speech today was originally spoken by our esteemed colleague, the senior senator from New York, structure. This shows you the Deming this is folks were playing for them lately and is really not is just the fact that this is politics political theater going on right now. I think Tom cotton was brilliant in doing that quoting all that and same utility. And by the way, that was Chuck Schumer who said that yet to hear sitter Cinema. The remarks we were discussing so you all take a listen. Let's play and while I continue to support the sales I will not support separate actions were sent the underlying disease division affecting our country debate over the Senate 60 that threshold shines a light on our broader challenges for me to restate my long-standing support 60 vote threshold to pass legislation.

Imagine once it's a very strong statement. You know she even this such as provisions of the bill that she supports, but that's also legally removed and what's what is the division part. I mean, that's what I'm here is it that it is the division over because more division by getting rid filibuster or is it the punishment of the voting rights and ideas.

I think I think was a lot of weird gobbledygook from the beginning of it ended okay but there was this and I think the division is exceedingly sated. We know she her position on the filibuster machine restated. I don't know idea.

I think the division may be that she's referring to, though, is that you know they do not have a mandate in the Senate.

It is is a divided Senate, and I think whenever you try to pass massive legislation that fundamentally changes building in America Whitley when you don't have a mandate you don't really have a majority except for the vice President.

That is, devices, and I like to think perhaps that's what she's talking about and it sounds like she is not going to vote. Now I yet hope it like I hope to put man what what your read on to two things. One, if she says she still in favor of the 60 vote threshold. Jane, it looks like she's not in favor of moving to a talking filibuster that would be a big blow to Democrats and she did say she would support the underlying bills that vote never even occurs until after the filibuster vote. So I agree with you is is a little weak but she got about for that before she could ever go for what I would support the underlying provisions of the bill, and here's part of the mansion. Part of this pleasing Joe mansion somebody ridiculous. This is part of what he wants in the language. It's to protect people like him who are wishy-washy, I don't.

It is impossible to predict the mansion built which is in this language drastically limits free speech imposes vague standards. The disadvantage groups who wish to advocate on behalf of legislative issues of issue advocacy, which is what he hates the most, because it's actual tells his constituents what he's doing in Washington DC and requires them to disclose the names of donors dented above a certain fashion and eat will you 30 seconds. Totally violates the constitutional principles going all the way back to the NAACP cases anonymous down the right how they get around the conflict.

I don't know I don't I don't see how they can take something I only have 36 edition Supreme Court case a just world and this is that you can't do that but that they don't care as long you find it out again 684 30 wanted to talk to us on their ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org or you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ keeping you informed and now Jordan secular back to secular research to your cause of this 161 to it.

If you're just joining us on the walk hundred Pacific exams a lot of details for audit misted if you go back in the show later today. The house is already moved through a new shell bill.

It was a NASA bill that had been going back and forth between the house and the Senate stripped all of the NASA language out in the inserted to put two laws, the voting HR for the voting rights act, which the John Louisville and S.

27 2747, which is Joe mansion's freedom to vote or act. What this does is legislative it allows them to get around the first potential filibuster, which is to even open debate so they don't have to do that after the city could open debate tonight and have a vote on this as early as Saturday is how quick the time is moving now that second vote. You have to in debate you would still have to get to the 60 vote threshold and if that fails, then you have to have the votes to change the rules to abolish that filibuster.

They don't have 60 votes so we know if this goes on this track.

The only way this moves forward legislatively to Joe Biden's desk is if Chuck Schumer can convince Cinema Kelly of course Joe mansion to go along with abolishing the filibuster to some extent. We don't know if it will just be for voting rights. We legislation we don't know if he'll just be deep for quote if use the word important like that somehow divided like all legislation is unimportant, but is moved to the house to the Senate. We started go through some of the details I just went through what it requires donor disclosure for issue help you live, sensitive, nonpolitical donations to candidates issue advocacy, though I Joe mansion wants that. That's it is bill because that's what gets him all the time in West Virginia. People who actually hold to account is a nobody's doing your light up with these ads.

I was just in West Virginia. That's was on a Monday. I was there state auditor and I was and have local TV on background.

He runs NASA banner ads trying to explain away. Explain what is due in Washington what he wants to prevent is you for being able to run an ad with telling people what he is doing and try to scare away your daughters so you can't do that I can't stand those provisions. What really upsets me. Always at the left is that they want to silence speech. What are you so afraid of an issue advocacy at the people who tell the truth about how your voting.

Job answered yes that's what he's afraid of is ultimately one day not being able to get reelected and end in West Virginia yeah, but there's other here mandated voter registration same-day voter registration, which some states may be able to do somebody do some are bit are so big that that could be a bureaucratic nightmare mandating where the early voting locations. Are there hours. This takes all of the federal government from the states to the federal government understand what they're doing. The states control this under the Constitution. Yeah, I mean this was great.

One example Chuck Schumer confuses a rural county in Georgia right so Mitch McConnell gave a speech yesterday things she wouldn't do is research that county during Cova just went to one location and he said see this disadvantaged people dev a car it's it's a 70% Republican County if they're worried about, and River Donald Trump lost Georgia right why the Democrat using that. That's the one county they could point to his offender about to lose Georgia Ray that Herschel Walker could win the was a short-term gain and in that's why I think that I get.

It's all these ideas you have to always go to the second step with them any redder. This is great were playing right now any three-dimensional chest just it really is three-dimensional chest and dad feel like I'm in the Middle East FL acumen Israel negotiating between the Palestinians, the Jordanians in the Israeli because it's nine dimensional rather than three-dimensional.

The point of the matter still rests with me at least in where is the constitutionality of this legislation by and how does it comport with the Constitution with wet loaded and which I repeat, the manner means and method of elections shall be left to the competent of the state legislature. How do you get around that by a piece of legislation. I want to take action on this. You give us a phone call.

164, 31 to call those three senators Cinema Kelly and mansion nicely Switch would be nice right now that we think there on our side. 202-224-3121 is Philip those moments the challenges facing Americans or substantial time in our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades ACLJ has been on the frontline protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you. Not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn. It's called mission will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the end what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership in the ACLJ is empowering the right to question your free copy of mission in life today online/secular. We are to your phone calls as well.

This one 800 684 30 went to national light of those lines for those three US senators, the Democrats have said they support the filibuster. They don't want to change that. That's a center Cinemas and Kelly from Arizona and Sen. mansion of West Virginia to reach each of their offices, positive message, folks, positive message there on our side right now so you lose them by inundating them with angry calls positive because we stand with you.

I here's the number 202224312 are that you asked to tell the capital operator which Senate office. You like to be connected to she can make up to three calls today quickly to save the Cinema Kelly mansion yet and willing to produce it is that maybe a dozen are tested.

About two that exact looking take a call before we do thing I wanted the people that are gonna make this call. How important is this what is the tone of that phone call that should sound like yeah I think it needs to be what Jordan said, thanking them for where they been on this or reiterating that they agree this is important is that, as they feel that it is in it and they know it's a tough vote in the day appreciate the fact that they're heading towards it at Jake.

Maybe the one other thing I would just put in the back people's minds here, no matter what leader Schumer says on this that this might be a special carveout for certain legislation.

I think people need to understand this very clearly there are going to be two sets of rules for the different parties.

II have always supported the filibuster.

Jake, not everybody agrees with me on this, but here's what nobody should support one party be and subject to the filibuster and the other party not been sent to the filibuster. So no matter what leader Schumer says this time. If this is enacted, the senators need to understand that every single piece of legislation that comes forward under Republican or Democrat leadership is not going to have a legislative filibuster is that something they want. I think probably not know what the reality is here and I think this what you need understand this bill has really bad language in the Midwest just pointed out one that's in the boat. Fair voting act, and wherever their calling and offering the vote act.

We put this like this is ridiculous.

What this does take a listen to what Les got the staleness because folks this tells you how bad this is will remember all the chaos in the glitches of the last election.

Those same chaos and glitches.

Not only will happen next time if this passes those chaos and glitches will be embedded into federal law. One of the things it troubles me. Jake is that they are required to count votes up to seven days past election day. Keep in mind during the mass mailing of it again.

Under this law have to count them up to seven days past election day, but no postmark is required so that your local election officials will not know when the ballot was mailed from where came in as part of the law and he think about them and just think about that one for moment, the idea of voter integrity when you can even determine when the vote was mailed. We don't. You don't have it and that's the idea. Here the idea on the part of the Democrats is an unprincipled power grab a federal elections. Forget voter integrity. They mischaracterize the Georgia bill completely as saying that it was contrary to voter integrity and extent of the dates beyond what New York early voting beyond New York and Delaware Avenue is that that that somehow suppress the vote.

So at the mischaracterization of things and to achieve a goal, and that's what we have to keep focusing in mind this is a federal democratically back power grab of United States elections through out the country. It is equating New Jersey with Arizona Washington state with Georgia Maine with Nevada. That's not the case. Each state is a sovereign. The Constitution says that in the Constitution rules.

Ultimately, no matter what leader Schumer says the phones Pauline coming from North Carolina online to a poly welcome to secular during the year thinking that this is unconstitutional as any of us can look it up for ourselves. So, God forbid that this should have let the record work will be legal challenges by the states who say this preclearance is unconstitutional.

Like you said, we represent support in at the Supreme Court that is unconstitutional in effect at the Supreme Court took a provision of the voting rights act on preclearance and on redistricting and an election law changes in the states that were of particular concern during the civil rights movement was the southern states and in recent years ago under the court said that's no longer needed were passed that look at who's in charge of the states with his running the states so we don't have preclearance that doesn't prevent by the way, the department just for going in after the loss pass which they have done in Georgia and other states and filing a lawsuit, saying it violates the voting rights act and other provisions so it would it would mean a very number of complicated legal battles between the midterm elections in the next Presidential election. If this was the past year and I think you know you look at the legal coming yeah okay and course there's a lot of legal issues that could could be your impact voting you're going to the core of constitutional issues and I think the idea here any that the states would be removed from the process by legislation when the Constitution itself says it is the states that have that authority under the election clause and we know the election clause here at the ACLJ out the idea that that would now be off limits because the state, the federal government would've usurped it, and that the sitting Atty. Gen. now America would what would be would be this you know, elections are is is really outrageous because it's exactly the opposite of what the founders had intended and actually wrote or J that's right.

This is, after all, and it's a good idea to look at the name of the country. It's the united states of America, the United States of America is not the federal republic of America. The states have sovereignties. The Constitution enshrines those sovereignties by saying that the method method and manner of elections are vested in the state legislatures.

Where you going with this bill. Now that takes that away and puts the power in the federal powers are God forbid that it's Merrick Garland, who shouldn't be on the Supreme Court, much less Atty. Gen. of the United States and takes and strips the states away of that authority. One of the states role at that point. What are we than what it what are we just a loose federation of colonies again and we just taken that away from the state authorities. I don't think that that's what the founders intended. I know that's not what the founders intended.

This is their key average count on you to running Margie to take over the elections because your message isn't winning with the American people is absolutely right. Every under their provision. Every change in voter rules in every state in the country. This is broader than the voting rights act legislation which was to correct wrongs like Jim Crow laws. This is every state for the bluest of blue to the register read for the Southeast debt to the northeast and all across country allies include Unalaska, every rule has to get pre-clear every rule change skip pre-cleared by bureaucrats in Washington DC whose rules won't be cleared red states that won't matter if the Republican President. After this, or Democrat because the bureaucracy is democratic. We know it and it was as it always has been. You can look it up in the sound that slamming them by that you look up their political contributions. It still it's the dense, so who's that prompted their new rules through it with their good rules.

Even the same rule as New York has George into the sea in Arizona and Midwestern states in North Carolina let me go through. It's not hard to figure out everybody's exactly right on this there about to face losing Nancy Pelosi will never be speaker of the house to get her life. Yes it's okay so she's done in Chuck Schumer's looking at never being in a leadership in his life.

He never be the top leader is barely holding onto right now. That was just because Kemal Harris. So again, there is feels like psychic the pressure of cinema pressure on Mark Kelly pressure tester mansion is going to be very intense in these next 48 hour stand, which is why we encourage people to call their offices and encouraged him to stand with their position. Yet your images to describe this we say this a lot on this show that you don't call vote in the House or the Senate unless you know you have the vote. They're not doing that here Jordan they're calling the votes even though they have active members that they need to support the measure are saying they oppose it they have done it. They put all of the pressure on them and Jordan. I would just_one of the things you said you said look at the campaign contributions of federal bureaucrats who would be in charge of this.

It's a great point. By the way, I don't want to Republican bureaucrat, and making these decisions either. But think about this. Gordon, if I give $200 to a candidate in any race across the country.

Federal taxpayers have to then contribute $1200 to that same campaign tainted so it means everybody listening here is can be funding the campaigns of Bernie Sanders and and AOC ticket. Is that what we want. I sure don't think so, too, are not a collection integrity. The most important thing about democracy in America it election integrity, and I've read through this legislation just like you all have it totally takes away from all election integrity integrity with elections are supposed to be at the where laws are set up is easy to vote in hard to cheat.

This does exactly the opposite. It makes it easy to vote, but it makes it extremely easy to cheat West has a blog upright should be up shortly. If it's not up yet. It's is it now this is a government takeover of your right to vote. What you need to know that's available@aclj.org again with Smith's latest blog on our website content there ACLJ dental also get that our social media platforms well government takeover the right to vote. What you need to will talk a little bit about that, we come back got a great pipe Chuck Schumer in play will take your calls to an 800-684-3110 is right in that I get that capital switchboard number if you want to get engaged and give coughs up work right now to consider cinema tester Kelly mansion call the same number them connected to their off 62022243121 positive message. Stay strong on your filibuster sitting house.

Given that messages only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called mission life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist the ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question free copy mission life today online ACLJ/challenges facing Americans is a time when our value freedom or constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stand with the American Center for Law and Justice for decades. ACLJ on the front lines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms then remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God where you can learn more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ684 31 to to talk to his on-air that's 100-684-3110 Phyllis in Louisiana online. Three-was welcome to secular you're on the year. I want to thank Democratic Sen. that are fighting for the American boy and fighting against the fell about and get those voting rights are not that that they're trying to pass that we are the we are the people, and in 2022.

Our voice will be heard at the end of the year I get want them to stay strong where all behind them. You give credit where credit is due. I don't agree with cinema. She likes this legislation talk to how bad I did I do it you know her position that she hasn't folded yet to the pressure of the Democratic Party. Joe mansion has not folded yet. Even though this is old legislation and what a tricky move.

There is… That he can vote for it in then.

What doesn't pass so he still voted for the legislation he leaves in which I think is horrendous like he always was to get voter ID voter disk donor disclosure.

He's a big proponent of that because he doesn't like people knowing that the actual issues in his home state. But again, you gotta give them credit because they got a machine of pressure up against that machine is going to turn on as much precious cost because how many fit legislative failures can Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi rack up. That's what they be doing yet again on this if they are not able to be successful is go to a Jimmy in New Hampshire on my one agent all of the quick parts and I'm waiting for my article on Peckinpah the pot. The regular election but it said but probably at any time by law, make all the regulations except in a matter of choosing candidate and my second point that that voter ID withheld not by the United States attorney caught in the case of crop infected Marion County. In the end of though the ID law dear trying to say that if you have new voter ID to go through us.

I think the difference between what article 1, section 4 saying about regulations and then this preclearance has where the Supreme Court stepped in and said it is one thing to play a role but if the states are playing the role to require the mall to get precleared by by the federal government is been known by the Supreme Court.

Right now they not interpreted to mean the states might if they want to Andy a regular time placement of elections and in the federal government can commence in Congress can come in and say we don't like that we can overturn it is never been there that night. It's never been interpreted that way and it's not about the Supreme Court if it ultimately gets. There will not interpreted that way and shouldn't interpreted that way when we have stage IV because states are the ultimate repositories of the sovereignty what is not given to the federal government is reserved to the states under the 10th amendment. Remember the government of the United the central government is a government of enumerated limited powers. The sovereignty rests with the people in the states. What we give up. We give up only grudgingly to the central government and we have retained the power to determine our elections in the states.

That's why this is fundamentally contrary to the founders of the rod of our Republic and their ideal of what America is Whisman Tyson has an article a prince is a government takeover of your right to vote. What you need to know, and I just asked was a really condensed version is available@aclj.org, but there's some interesting information your folks.

You need to know why were on the so aggressively is very very important and in and in the blog is on our website.

I talk about the differences between some of the state laws are passed recently that have been roundly condemned by Pres. Biden others, and why those laws really increase voting opportunity and preserve the integrity of the boat itself, but also go through the proposed federal laws and talk about some the things we talked about today why they do you know what they are not legal. Of course, constitutionally, but also the rules that they make.

That will permanently put into federal law. All of the chaos and think in the last election. Also talk a little bit in the article about the hyperbole and exaggeration this going on as Democrat politicians try to convince people that this is the right thing to do when they know it's not right. Jordan isn't part of this mail to get back to your home state where you were born, George, isn't this now venting go to Georgia yesterday didn't eat aren't they making the statement because I now think the Congress is going to flip Democratic with that Georgia may well have Republican Sen. again right then and that plays into them losing power structure for the old probably won't get power back his lifetime. They seen a wave of retirements from ultimate is the Congress of Democrats in the house 23 allow them to do that because they've been out of power before the been in power that I want to go through that again. Just being the minority party for 23 have already have retired a summer by the way, it's safe. Democrat seats. They just don't want to go through it again.

So the house. Nancy Pelosi, if Republicans take back the house was there on track to do everything you think CJ between and on track to do.

She will never be speaker of the house again.

She's insecure, very old, so these older leaders in Congress are seeing the writing on the wall for their careers and I think this is the last in this Joe Biden as part of that group.

This is a last ditch effort to either throwing out all of their previously held positions on the filibuster quickly to Mikhail in college about bull Connor and George Wallace.

If you have the calling Tim Scott George Wallace is molecular or is is Kristin Cinema from Arizona who was bisexual she George Wallace give me a break loose with her doing that this is what this is what Sen. Chuck Schumer said about this on the floor space in 2017 about the importance of the filibuster.

The legislative filibuster, which is the most important distinction between the Senate and the house without the 60 vote threshold for legislation. The Senate becomes a majoritarian institution like the house much more subject to the winds of short-term electoral change know Sen. would like to see this happen.

So let's find a way to further protect 60 vote rule for legislation except when you're legislation inured parties in power is about to go nowhere in the United States Senate.

Let's change yet so this is my thinking as we in the broadcasting and I really encourage people to make those phone calls because this is not like two weeks. This is day submit.

They've got to take action really tonight fan we would see the action to start this process. You see, later, Schumer likely file) and there be an intervening day tomorrow and vote Saturday night.

So Jordan I would just say I'm a lucky and need the pressure on the Senators over the next 48 hours. It's can be intense. You hear a lot of good things today Jordan we seen this before you can go through 48 hours of senators pressuring you constituents pressuring you grassroots activists pressuring you a journey to be a very different thing to go down to the floor of the Senate and cast a vote that backs up these words. I hope they do it and that's why encourage people to continue to call let them know there are not alone stand behind it. You would that they would have they would appoint the Atty. Gen. as the elections are tells you what this is all about. They think they're gonna lose power in the midterm elections, which they are in the house they want to be a right away racist and that in St. George is that you all the screaming. Right majority leader and a white speaker the house might get in there to say this, the irony of all this there to say election fraud, which are having these investigations in Washington nothing you can say that right you can stay sane, and still says that her for so she has in there already building that case and you got 20 seconds and already building that case in your home state of Georgia right now as you absolutely are in the lives that day because they people of the United States will not tolerate. I guy think that sending it is right. I don't think that that's my reason… Ms. blog on ACLJ.org.

Great way for you to be engaged in its entitled as a cover to cover your right to vote. What you need to know ACLJ doubt will get that on social media platforms well and support the work of the ACLJ NACLJ.org ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side.

If you're already a member thinking. If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org or you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ